1. Home
  2. AI, Automation & Machine Learning
  3. No-Code & Low-Code App Builders
  4. No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Marketing Agencies

Ranking · No-Code & Low-Code App Builders

Best No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Marketing Agencies

8 products scored on six criteria. Duda leads at 9.0 and the field is tight, with 0.4 points between first and last, so read the catches before you pick. Every product opens to the evidence behind its number.

8 products scored6 criteria85 sources citedUpdated Aug 12, 2026
1 Dudaduda.co

Duda's sites lead the industry on Core Web Vitals scores.

Read the reviewVisit ↗
2 MindStudiomindstudio.ai

200+ AI models, no markup, API needs $60 plan.

Read the reviewVisit ↗
3 Knackknack.com

Knack charges no per-user fee on any of its plans

Read the reviewVisit ↗
8Products
8.6 to 9.0Score spread
4Free plan or tier
01

The ranking

Order follows the score. Six little boxes show each product's criterion scores: green or red is above or below the category average, grey means too few products share that criterion to compare. The full review sits right under each one.

Nothing matches that filter here. Tap All to see every product.

1

Duda

duda.co · Duda AI Website Platform · scored Dec 2025

Duda's sites lead the industry on Core Web Vitals scores.

Best forAgencies and freelancers managing multiple client sites needing white-labeling.

Free tier From $14 per month free planagency-friendlyno-code
Top score

White-label, no-code website builder for agencies, with AI tools and client billing built in.

Standout fact83.63% of websites on Duda scored well on Core Web Vitals, the top rate among major CMS platforms.searchenginejournal.com
Biggest catchExporting a site loses all dynamic features and analytics, and cannot be imported back.support.duda.co
83.63%Sites passing Core Web Vitalssearchenginejournal.com
$14/moStarting price
14 daysFree trial length

Standout number

83.63%of Duda sites pass Core Web Vitals

Source: searchenginejournal.com

Starting price

$14/mofree plan and 14-day trial also available

Upside

  • Top Core Web Vitals scores among CMS
  • Full white-labeling for agencies
  • Built-in client billing and management

Catch

  • Site export loses dynamic features
  • eCommerce needs an extra monthly fee
  • No live chat support
Pick it ifAgencies and freelancers managing multiple client sites needing white-labeling.
Skip it ifBuilders wanting full code ownership or complex, data-heavy web apps.
PricingFrom $14/month, free plan available, 14-day free trial

Editor's takeDuda leads major CMS platforms on Core Web Vitals, with 83.63% of its sites passing Google's performance benchmarks, a real advantage for agencies whose clients care about search rankings. White-labeling covers the editor, dashboard and support portal, and built-in client billing removes a step most website builders leave to third-party tools. The tradeoff shows on the way out: exporting a site strips dynamic features and analytics, and the code cannot be reimported.

How does Duda perform on Google's Core Web Vitals?

Strongly. Search Engine Journal found 83.63% of websites built on Duda pass Core Web Vitals, the highest rate among major content management systems it tested in 2025.

What happens if an agency exports a Duda site?

Dynamic features like contact forms, personalization and analytics are lost on export, and the exported code cannot be imported back into Duda, so export is effectively a one-way move.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.18 points)
9.3
Product Capability & Depthduda.coduda.co
9.0
Market Credibility & Trust Signals
9.1
Usability & Customer Experience
8.8
Value, Pricing & Transparencyduda.co
9.5
Agency Features & White LabelingLooked for: We assess features specifically built for agencies, such as white-labeling, client management, and team collaboration.The platform offers comprehensive white-labeling (editor, dashboard, support portal), client billing integration, and asset sharing across teams, making it a top choice for scaling agencies.duda.coduda.coduda.co
9.0
Security, Compliance & Data Protection

Score adjustments−0.18 points in total

−0.08Exporting a site results in the loss of all dynamic features (contact forms, personalization) and analytics, and the code cannot be imported back into Duda.support.duda.co · severity 60/100
−0.04Native eCommerce functionality is not included in the base subscription and requires an additional monthly add-on fee per website.creatingawebsitetoday.com · severity 50/100
−0.06Developer Mode is restricted when using Flex Mode sections, requiring users to exit the visual design mode to access and edit code.support.duda.co · severity 45/100
2

MindStudio

mindstudio.ai · MindStudio AI Builder · scored Dec 2025

200+ AI models, no markup, API needs $60 plan.

Best forNon-technical teams and agencies building AI agents across multiple LLMs.

From $20 per month model-agnostic AIno markup pricingSOC 2 Type II

No-code AI agent builder giving access to 200+ models at pass-through pricing, no markup.

Standout factMindStudio charges the exact provider price for AI model usage, with no markup over direct API costs.mindstudio.ai
Biggest catchAPI access and embedding are locked to the $60/month Pro plan. The $20/month Starter plan lacks both.findmyaitool.io
200+AI models availablefindmyaitool.io
$36 millionFunding raisedpulse2.com
150,000+Agents deployed globallypulse2.com

Standout number

200+AI models accessible without separate API keys

Source: findmyaitool.io

Plans

Pro$60/mo

API, email triggers, scheduled runs

Source: findmyaitool.io

Upside

  • Access to 200+ AI models, no markup
  • SOC 2 Type I and II, GDPR compliant
  • 1,000+ business tool integrations

Catch

  • API access needs the $60 Pro plan
  • Steep learning curve for custom logic
  • Usage costs add up for heavy users
Pick it ifNon-technical teams and agencies building AI agents across multiple LLMs.
Skip it ifDevelopers needing full source code export or self-hosted deployment.
PricingStarter from $20/month, Pro from $60/month for API access and embedding.

Editor's takeMindStudio earns its rank by removing the usual markup on AI model usage, charging exactly what OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google charge directly, backed by $36 million in funding and adoption by organizations like Harvard. The $20 Starter plan works for light prototyping, but any team needing API access or embedding should budget for the $60 Pro tier from the start.

Does MindStudio mark up AI model costs?

No. MindStudio states it charges the exact same price as using your own API keys directly with the model provider, with no added markup.

What's the difference between MindStudio's Starter and Pro plans?

The $20/month Starter plan is limited to 5 agents with no API access. The $60/month Pro plan adds API and email triggers, scheduled runs, and MCP support.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 2 penalties (−0.09 points)
9.4
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex AI agents, the variety of models available, and the depth of customization options.MindStudio provides a visual builder supporting 200+ AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.) without requiring user API keys, enabling multi-step workflows, RAG, and custom code execution.findmyaitool.iomax-productive.aifindmyaitool.io
9.2
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We look for funding stability, enterprise adoption, leadership experience, and verified user reviews.Backed by $36M in funding and founded by ex-Google executives, the platform boasts over 150,000 deployed agents and usage by major organizations like Harvard and HMRC.pulse2.commindstudio.aicnet.com
8.8
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We assess the ease of use for non-technical users alongside the depth of resources available for learning the platform.While the visual builder is praised for its intuitive design, users report a steep learning curve for advanced features like custom functions and complex logic.todaytesting.comproducthunt.com
8.6
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We examine pricing structures, hidden costs, and the accessibility of key features across different plan tiers.MindStudio offers a transparent pass-through pricing model for AI usage, but essential features like API access are locked behind the $60/month Pro plan.mindstudio.aimindstudio.aifindmyaitool.io
9.0
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We evaluate how well the product connects with external tools, APIs, and existing business workflows.The platform integrates with over 1,000 business tools and supports serverless AI function calling via API, making it highly extensible.max-productive.aiuniversity.mindstudio.ai
9.1
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We verify security certifications, data handling policies, and enterprise-grade protection features.MindStudio is SOC 2 Type I & II certified, GDPR compliant, and offers enterprise features like SSO and role-based access control.max-productive.aimindstudio.ai

Score adjustments−0.09 points in total

−0.04API access and embedding capabilities are restricted to the Pro plan ($60/mo) and above, limiting the utility of the Starter plan ($20/mo) for developers who need integration features.findmyaitool.io · severity 50/100
−0.05Users report a steep learning curve for mastering advanced features like custom functions and complex conditional logic, often requiring deep documentation study.producthunt.com · severity 45/100
3

Knack

knack.com · Knack: No-Code App Development · scored Dec 2025

Knack charges no per-user fee on any of its plans

Best forOperations teams building internal database apps like portals and CRMs

From $39 per month SOC 2HIPAAunlimited users
−0.1 vs #1

A no-code app builder for relational databases, offering unlimited users on every pricing plan.

Standout factKnack stores over 5 billion data records and serves clients including Spotify, Honda and Harvard University.knack.com
Biggest catchThere is no native staging or sandbox environment, so users must duplicate apps to test changes safely.forums.knack.com
5B+Data records storedknack.com
1.5MMax records per appknack.com
$39/moStarter planknack.com

Standout number

5B+data records stored across Knack apps

Source: knack.com

Free vs paid

Typical no-code pricing

$0
  • Charges per seat/user
  • Costs scale with team size

Knack, from $39/mo

  • Unlimited users, every plan
  • Priced by records & storage

Source: knack.com

Upside

  • Unlimited users on all pricing plans
  • SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA compliant
  • Handles up to 1.5M records per app

Catch

  • No native staging/sandbox environment
  • Pricing scales with record count
  • Reporting lacks deep BI tools
Pick it ifOperations teams building internal database apps like portals and CRMs
Skip it ifTeams building highly custom, pixel-perfect consumer-facing interfaces
PricingFrom $39/mo (Starter); unlimited users on every plan

Editor's takeKnack prices by database records and storage rather than seats, so every plan from Starter to Enterprise includes unlimited users, a real cost advantage for scaling internal tools. It handles complex relational data, up to 1.5 million records per app, and holds both SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA compliance, letting it serve regulated industries many no-code tools cannot touch. The main gap is workflow safety: there's no built-in staging environment, so testing changes means duplicating the live app.

Does Knack charge per user?

No. Knack offers unlimited users on every plan, from Starter through Enterprise, pricing instead by database records and storage used.

Is Knack suitable for healthcare data?

Yes. Knack undergoes HIPAA audits and offers a HIPAA-compliant version of the product that includes signing a Business Associate Agreement.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.19 points)
8.9
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to handle complex data relationships, logic, and application workflows without requiring code.Knack excels as a database-centric builder, supporting complex many-to-many relationships and handling up to 1.5 million records, though front-end design flexibility has historically been secondary to data structure.knack.comknack.combaytechconsulting.com
9.3
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the vendor's longevity, customer base size, and adoption by reputable organizations.Founded in 2010, Knack is a mature player with over 5,000 customers including major enterprises like Spotify and Honda, demonstrating significant market stability.techcrunch.combaytechconsulting.comknack.com
8.8
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We analyze user feedback regarding the learning curve, interface intuitiveness, and quality of customer support.Users generally find it intuitive for building database apps, and support is frequently cited as a highlight, though the interface was previously considered dated before recent updates.knack.comg2.comg2.com
9.4
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We examine pricing structures, hidden costs, and value relative to competitors, specifically looking for per-user vs. flat-rate models.Knack offers a highly competitive 'unlimited users' model on all plans, pricing instead based on database records and storage, which provides immense value for scaling teams.knack.combaytechconsulting.comknack.com
8.7
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We look for native integrations, API availability, and compatibility with automation platforms like Zapier or Make.Knack has a robust open API and strong native connectors for Zapier and Make, allowing it to integrate with thousands of external services, though its internal plugin library is smaller than some CMS giants.knack.comzapier.comdocs.knack.com
9.5
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We evaluate certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR) and security features essential for enterprise and regulated industries.Knack demonstrates enterprise-grade security with SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, HIPAA-compliant options, and GDPR adherence, making it suitable for regulated industries.knack.comknack.com

Score adjustments−0.19 points in total

−0.08Lack of a native staging or sandbox environment requires users to duplicate apps for testing, risking data inconsistencies.forums.knack.com · severity 60/100
−0.06Front-end design customization is limited compared to dedicated website builders, with users noting restrictions on page layouts and formatting.g2.com · severity 45/100
−0.05Reporting and analytics features are functional but lack the depth found in specialized BI tools, which may limit complex data analysis.appinstitute.com · severity 40/100
4

Relevance AI

relevanceai.com · Relevance AI Workforce Builder · scored Dec 2025

Invent builds agents from text, but refunds are strict

Best forSales and ops teams automating multi-step BDR and research workflows with AI agents.

Quote only SOC 2 Type IIGDPRAI features
−0.2 vs #1

No-code platform for building and orchestrating multi-agent AI workforces, with zero markup on AI model costs.

Standout factInvent generates a functional agent draft from a plain English descriptionskywork.ai
Biggest catchRefund requests are refused even on a prorated basis, users report.toolfountain.com
4.3/5G2 ratingtoolfountain.com
2,000+Integrationsrelevanceai.com
CanvaEnterprise customerrelevanceai.com

In their words

“You describe a task in plain English... and Invent instantly generates a functional agent draft”

skywork.ai

What reviewers say

G2
4.3/5 · reviewed

Source: toolfountain.com

Upside

  • Invent builds a working agent from text
  • Zero markup on AI vendor credits
  • 2,000+ integrations plus a Python SDK

Catch

  • Steep learning curve for complex agents
  • Strict no-refund policy, users report
  • UI can overwhelm non-technical beginners
Pick it ifSales and ops teams automating multi-step BDR and research workflows with AI agents.
Skip it ifUsers needing simple, linear automation like basic Zapier, or a tight budget.
PricingContact for pricing; AI vendor credits passed through with no markup

Editor's takeRelevance AI's Invent feature turns a plain English task description into a working agent draft, then lets agents collaborate through a visual Workforce Canvas. Its pricing passes AI vendor costs through at no markup, and Canva counts among its enterprise users. The learning curve steepens fast for complex setups, and users report the company refuses refunds even on a prorated basis.

Does Relevance AI mark up AI costs?

No. The company passes the exact cost of AI usage, called Vendor Credits, directly to customers with no markup. Platform fees are billed separately from these pass-through AI model costs.

Does Relevance AI offer refunds?

Reviewers report a strict no-refund policy. One user requested a prorated refund after finding the tool did not fit their specific need, and the company declined. Confirm refund terms directly before committing to a paid plan.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.12 points)
9.1
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to create, orchestrate, and deploy complex AI agents with advanced reasoning and tool use.Relevance AI offers a robust 'Workforce' builder that goes beyond simple chatbots, enabling multi-agent orchestration, delegation, and a unique 'Invent' feature that generates agents from text descriptions.relevanceai.comrelevanceai.comskywork.ai
9.0
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We look for enterprise adoption, verified user reviews, and transparent company operations.The platform is used by major enterprises like Canva and holds a solid 4.3/5 rating on G2, demonstrating significant market trust and proven scalability.relevanceai.comtoolfountain.com
8.7
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We assess the learning curve, UI intuitiveness, and the balance between power and ease of use.While the 'Invent' feature simplifies initial setup, users report a steep learning curve for complex workflows and a UI that can feel 'busy' or overwhelming.toolfountain.comrelevanceai.com
8.6
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We evaluate pricing models, hidden costs, and the fairness of resource allocation.Relevance AI uses a transparent 'pass-through' model for vendor credits (zero markup on LLM costs) but faces criticism for a strict no-refund policy.relevanceai.comrelevanceai.comtoolfountain.com
8.9
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We examine the breadth of third-party connections and developer extensibility.With over 2,000 app integrations and a dedicated Python SDK for developers, the platform bridges no-code ease with code-based extensibility.relevanceai.comrelevanceai.comsdk.relevanceai.com
9.4
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We check for industry-standard certifications, data handling policies, and enterprise security features.The platform demonstrates enterprise-grade security with SOC 2 Type II certification, GDPR compliance, and features like SSO and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC).relevanceai.comrelevanceai.com

Score adjustments−0.12 points in total

−0.05Users report a steep learning curve and 'busy' UI for complex multi-agent setups, making it overwhelming for non-technical users.toolfountain.com · severity 50/100
−0.03Documented user complaints regarding a strict no-refund policy, even for prorated amounts.toolfountain.com · severity 45/100
−0.04Official documentation notes performance lag or crashes in the tool builder when browser extensions (like Grammarly) are active.relevanceai.com · severity 40/100
5

WeWeb

weweb.io · WeWeb: AI-Powered No-Code Platform · scored Dec 2025

WeWeb exports Vue.js code, needs a separate backend.

Best forTeams wanting pixel-perfect frontends with code export and no lock-in.

From $24 per month SOC 2ISO 27001Vue.js export
−0.2 vs #1

A no-code frontend builder exporting standard Vue.js code, connecting to any backend like Supabase or Xano.

Standout factPwC cut internal tool build time from up to 3 years to 4-8 weeks using WeWeb.weweb.io
Biggest catchProduction apps require two subscriptions: a Seat plan and a Hosting plan.pricing.weweb.io
$24/moStarting priceweweb.io
3 yrs to 4-8 wksPwC build time reductionweweb.io

In their words

“What used to take up to 3 years now takes between 4-8 weeks”

weweb.io

Compliance

✓ SOC 2 Type II✓ ISO 27001

Source: weweb.io

Upside

  • Exports standard Vue.js code
  • Backend-agnostic across Supabase, Xano, SQL
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001

Catch

  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Requires separate Seat and Hosting plans
  • AI-generated UI needs manual cleanup
Pick it ifTeams wanting pixel-perfect frontends with code export and no lock-in.
Skip it ifBeginners intimidated by API and database concepts.
PricingFrom $24/mo, plus a separate Hosting plan unless self-hosting.

Editor's takeWeWeb exports projects as standard Vue.js code, so teams can self-host and avoid vendor lock-in entirely. PwC used it to cut internal tool build times from up to 3 years to just 4-8 weeks. The pricing model asks more in return, splitting production apps into a Seat subscription and a separate Hosting subscription.

Does WeWeb lock me into their hosting?

No. WeWeb exports standard Vue.js code that can be self-hosted on any infrastructure, removing the visit and bandwidth limits of WeWeb's own hosting plans.

How much does WeWeb cost?

Plans start at $24 a month per editor seat. Deploying on WeWeb's own hosting requires a separate Hosting plan unless you choose to self-host.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.16 points)
8.9
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex, production-grade frontends without code while offering code export and custom logic.WeWeb provides a comprehensive visual editor for Vue.js applications, featuring AI-assisted component generation, complex workflows, and the unique ability to export standard Vue.js code for self-hosting.weweb.ioweweb.iosommo.io
9.3
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the product's backing, enterprise adoption, and verified user reviews to determine reliability.Backed by Y Combinator (W21) and used by major enterprises like PwC for internal tools, WeWeb demonstrates significant market validation and enterprise readiness.techcrunch.comycombinator.comweweb.io
8.6
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine the learning curve, interface intuitiveness, and support quality for both developers and non-technical users.While powerful, the platform has a documented steep learning curve for non-developers, requiring understanding of web concepts like APIs and relational databases.weweb.ioreddit.comg2.com
8.5
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze the pricing structure, hidden costs, and value proposition relative to competitors.Pricing is predictable but requires two subscriptions (Seat + Hosting) for production apps, which can increase the total cost of ownership compared to all-in-one tools.weweb.iopricing.weweb.ionocodeassistant.agency
9.4
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We evaluate how well the product connects with external backends and APIs, which is critical for a frontend-only builder.WeWeb excels here by design, offering deep native integrations with Xano, Supabase, and Airtable, while allowing connection to any REST API.weweb.ioweweb.ioweweb.io
9.1
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We check for enterprise-grade security certifications, data handling policies, and self-hosting options.WeWeb is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliant and offers self-hosting capabilities that allow data to remain entirely within the client's infrastructure.weweb.iopricing.weweb.io

Score adjustments−0.16 points in total

−0.06Steep learning curve for non-technical users; requires understanding of APIs and databases.reddit.com · severity 60/100
−0.04Dual subscription model (Seat + Hosting) increases complexity and total cost for production apps.pricing.weweb.io · severity 50/100
−0.06AI-generated UI components often require manual cleanup and may not perfectly match existing design systems.nocodeassistant.agency · severity 45/100
6

Flowise

flowiseai.com · Flowise - AI Agent Builder · scored Dec 2025

Flowise builds LLM agents free, patched a critical bug

Best forDevelopers prototyping LLM flows and multi-agent systems

Free tier From $35 per month Open sourceLLM builderMulti-agent
−0.3 vs #1

Open-source visual builder for LangChain-based AI agents, free to self-host with a $35/month cloud tier.

Standout factOver 48,500 GitHub stars and 23,600 forks mark it as a widely adopted open-source project.github.com
Biggest catchA critical file-upload vulnerability, CVE-2025-61687, allowed potential remote code execution before being addressed.feedly.com
48.5k+GitHub starsgithub.com
$35/monthCloud starter planfindmyaitool.io
100+Integrationsdocs.flowiseai.com

Standout number

48.5k+GitHub stars

Source: github.com

Free vs paid

Self-hosted

$0
  • Apache 2.0 license
  • Unlimited local use

Cloud from

$35/mo
  • Unlimited flows
  • 10k predictions/month

Source: findmyaitool.io

Upside

  • Free and open source
  • 100+ pre-built integrations
  • Multi-agent orchestration via Agentflow

Catch

  • Critical CVE reported in 2025
  • Lacks visual debugging tools
  • Timeouts on large document uploads
Pick it ifDevelopers prototyping LLM flows and multi-agent systems
Skip it ifNon-technical users wanting a polished, ready-to-use interface
PricingFree, open source (Apache 2.0); cloud from $35/month

Editor's takeFlowise gives developers a visual canvas over LangChain and LlamaIndex, letting them wire up chatbots and multi-agent systems without writing boilerplate code. Its GitHub following, over 48,500 stars, signals real developer adoption for an open-source project. Security needs attention: a critical file-upload vulnerability disclosed in 2025 allowed potential remote code execution, and reviewers say it still lacks the debugging tools competitors like Dify offer.

Is Flowise free to use?

Yes. It is open source under the Apache 2.0 license, free to self-host, with a managed cloud option starting at $35 a month for unlimited flows and 10,000 predictions.

Has Flowise had security issues?

A critical file-upload vulnerability, CVE-2025-61687, was identified in version 3.0.7, potentially allowing remote code execution for authenticated users. Enterprise plans add RBAC and SSO controls.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.22 points)
9.0
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to visually build complex LLM workflows, support for multi-agent orchestration, and RAG capabilities.Flowise offers a comprehensive visual builder for LLM flows, supporting LangChain and LlamaIndex with capabilities for multi-agent orchestration (Agentflow), RAG, and custom tool creation.flowiseai.comflowiseai.comfindmyaitool.io
9.1
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess developer adoption, community activity, open-source traction, and enterprise usage signals.Flowise has achieved significant traction in the developer community with over 48,000 GitHub stars and a high fork count, indicating widespread adoption and active contribution.flowiseai.comgithub.comyoutube.com
8.6
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine the ease of use for both technical and non-technical users, documentation quality, and debugging tools.While powerful for developers, the interface is less intuitive for non-technical users compared to competitors like Dify, and it lacks advanced visual debugging features.flowiseai.commedium.comgptbots.ai
9.4
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze the pricing structure, open-source availability, and cost-effectiveness of managed cloud options.Flowise offers immense value as a free, open-source tool (Apache 2.0) with a transparent, reasonably priced cloud tier for those who prefer managed hosting.flowiseai.comgithub.comfindmyaitool.io
9.3
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We look for the breadth of supported LLMs, vector databases, and third-party tools available as drag-and-drop nodes.The platform boasts over 100 integrations, including major LLMs, vector stores like Pinecone and Milvus, and tools like Zapier and Slack.flowiseai.comdocs.flowiseai.comdocs.flowiseai.com
8.2
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We evaluate security features, vulnerability management, and enterprise compliance capabilities.While the Enterprise plan offers RBAC and SSO, the open-source version has had recent critical CVEs related to file uploads and authentication bypass.flowiseai.comfeedly.comdocs.flowiseai.com

Score adjustments−0.22 points in total

−0.09Critical file upload vulnerability (CVE-2025-61687) allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution.feedly.com · severity 80/100
−0.06Lacks intuitive debugging and visual tracing features compared to competitors like Dify, making it harder to troubleshoot complex flows.medium.com · severity 60/100
−0.07Users report timeouts (Gateway Timeout 504) and failures when upserting large documents or files with high word counts.github.com · severity 50/100
7

Glide

glideapps.com · Glide No-Code App Builder · scored Dec 2025

Big Tables scale to 10M rows, but no app stores

Best forTeams building internal tools directly from Google Sheets or Excel

Free tier SOC 2 Type 2no app store publishingspreadsheet-to-app
−0.3 vs #1

No-code platform turning spreadsheets into AI-powered apps, deployed as web apps only.

Standout factGlide's Big Tables feature scales to 10 million rows, far beyond the standard 25,000-row limit.glideapps.com
Biggest catchGlide apps are Progressive Web Apps and cannot be published directly to the Apple App Store or Google Play.help.glideapps.com
10M rowsBig Tables row capacityglideapps.com
25,000 rowsStandard table row limitcommunity.glideapps.com
1M+Users who have built appsfahimai.com

Standout number

10Mrows supported by Big Tables

Source: glideapps.com

In their words

“It is built using Progressive Web App (PWA) technology, which means its apps cannot be published in traditional app stores like Google Play or Apple App Store.”

help.glideapps.com

Upside

  • Turns spreadsheets into apps instantly
  • SOC 2 Type 2 certified
  • Big Tables scale to 10M rows

Catch

  • No native app store publishing
  • Standard tables capped at 25,000 rows
  • Design customization is limited
Pick it ifTeams building internal tools directly from Google Sheets or Excel
Skip it ifConsumer-facing apps that need Apple App Store or Google Play listing
PricingFree plan, Maker $49/mo, Team $99/mo, Business $249/mo

Editor's takeGlide turns a Google Sheet or Excel file into a working app almost instantly, and its Big Tables feature scales that up to 10 million rows for enterprise use. It earned SOC 2 Type 2 certification in mid-2024 and counts ITV and the PGA of America as customers. The tradeoff is deployment: Glide apps ship as Progressive Web Apps, so they cannot be published directly to the Apple App Store or Google Play.

Can Glide apps be published to the App Store?

No. Glide apps are built as Progressive Web Apps and cannot be published directly to the Apple App Store or Google Play Store without a third-party workaround, according to Glide's help center.

How much does Glide cost?

A free plan is available. The Maker plan starts around $49 a month, Team is about $99 a month, and Business is about $249 a month, according to a 2025 Glide pricing review.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.18 points)
8.7
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build functional applications from data sources without code, including AI features and workflow automation.Glide excels at instantly converting spreadsheets (Google Sheets, Excel, Airtable) into apps with robust AI capabilities and workflow automation, though it deploys primarily as Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) rather than native mobile binaries.glideapps.comglideapps.comglideapps.com
9.2
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the product's adoption by reputable enterprises, security certifications, and community size.Glide demonstrates exceptional market credibility with SOC 2 Type 2 certification and adoption by major organizations like TTR Sotheby's, ITV, and the PGA of America.techcrunch.comglideapps.comglideapps.com
8.9
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We analyze the ease of use for non-technical users, the quality of the interface, and the learning curve.The platform is widely praised for its intuitive drag-and-drop interface that simplifies app creation, although some users note limitations in design customization compared to coding.glideapps.comg2.comlowcode.agency
8.5
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We evaluate the pricing structure, transparency of costs, and the value provided relative to feature limits.Glide offers a free tier and scalable paid plans, but recent pricing changes regarding 'updates' and user limits have caused some friction and complexity for customers.glideapps.comskywork.aijodoo.com
9.0
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We examine the breadth of third-party integrations and the ability to connect with external data and APIs.Glide boasts a robust ecosystem with native integrations for major tools like OpenAI, Slack, and Salesforce, plus full API access on higher tier plans.glideapps.comglideapps.comglideapps.com
8.8
Scalability & PerformanceLooked for: We assess the platform's ability to handle large datasets and high user volumes without performance degradation.While standard spreadsheet sources have row limits, Glide's 'Big Tables' feature significantly enhances scalability, supporting up to 10 million rows for enterprise needs.glideapps.comcommunity.glideapps.comglideapps.com

Score adjustments−0.18 points in total

−0.08Glide apps are Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) and cannot be natively published to the Apple App Store or Google Play Store without third-party workarounds.help.glideapps.com · severity 60/100
−0.04The pricing model based on 'updates' and user counts can be complex and potentially expensive for apps with high data frequency or large public user bases.skywork.ai · severity 50/100
−0.06Design customization is limited to pre-set components and themes; users cannot fully customize the UI/UX with custom code or CSS on standard plans.blaze.tech · severity 45/100
8

Bubble

bubble.io · Bubble: No-Code AI App Builder · scored Dec 2025

Bubble builds full-stack apps, one user got a $1,000 surprise bill

Best forFounders building functional, full-stack SaaS MVPs without code

Free tier From $29 per month full-stack no-codeSOC 2 Type IIGDPR compliant
−0.4 vs #1

Full-stack no-code platform for building web and mobile apps with a visual editor and built-in database.

Standout factOne user reported a $1,000 surprise bill after using 7 million workload units in under 12 hours.forum.bubble.io
Biggest catchBubble does not sign Business Associate Agreements, so it cannot be made HIPAA-compliant.specode.ai
$29/moStarting pricebubble.io
$1,000Reported surprise billforum.bubble.io

Standout number

$1,000surprise bill from a workflow loop

Source: forum.bubble.io

Compliance

✓ SOC 2 Type II✓ GDPRHIPAA (no BAA)

Source: specode.ai

Upside

  • True full-stack visual development
  • SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant
  • AI app generator included

Catch

  • No source code export
  • Unpredictable Workload Unit billing
  • Not HIPAA compliant
Pick it ifFounders building functional, full-stack SaaS MVPs without code
Skip it ifUsers needing HIPAA compliance, code export, or a shallow learning curve
PricingFree plan available, paid from $29/mo plus workload-based usage fees

Editor's takeBubble stands apart from most no-code tools by handling frontend, backend, and database in one visual environment, enough to ship production apps rather than just prototypes. It runs on AWS with SOC 2 Type II compliance. Its Workload Unit pricing model has caused documented billing shocks, with one builder's workflow loop generating a $1,000 charge overnight.

Can I export my Bubble app's source code?

No. Bubble apps run only on Bubble's platform; the export feature provides JSON metadata, not usable HTML, CSS, or JS.

Is Bubble pricing predictable?

Not always. Its Workload Unit model has led to documented cases of bills jumping from $30-120 a month to $400-600 after inefficient workflows.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.20 points)
9.4
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex, full-stack applications including frontend design, backend logic, and database management without code.Bubble offers a comprehensive full-stack visual development environment that integrates a drag-and-drop UI builder, a powerful workflow engine, and a built-in database, recently enhanced with native mobile app capabilities in beta.bubble.iobubble.iogoodspeed.studio
9.0
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the platform's adoption rate, funding history, compliance certifications, and infrastructure reliability.Bubble hosts over 3 million apps and is backed by substantial funding, operating on AWS infrastructure with SOC 2 Type II compliance, though it faces criticism regarding vendor lock-in.techcrunch.commanual.bubble.iobubble.io
8.8
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We analyze the learning curve, ease of use for beginners, and the quality of support and educational resources.While powerful, Bubble is known for a steep learning curve compared to simpler builders, requiring significant time investment to master its logic and database features.bubble.ioblaze.techgoodspeed.studio
8.2
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We evaluate the pricing model's fairness, predictability, and transparency, specifically regarding scaling costs.The transition to a 'Workload Unit' (WU) pricing model has caused controversy and unpredictability, with some users experiencing significant cost spikes due to inefficient workflows.bubble.ioforum.bubble.ioreddit.com
8.6
Scalability & PerformanceLooked for: We examine the platform's ability to handle high user loads, complex database queries, and enterprise-grade traffic.Bubble handles scaling well for most use cases via AWS, but very large apps or complex data processing may require external backends or enterprise plans to maintain performance.bubble.iogoodspeed.studioforum.bubble.io
8.5
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We check for industry-standard compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA) and data ownership policies.Bubble is SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant but notably does not sign Business Associate Agreements (BAA), making it non-compliant for HIPAA (healthcare) apps out of the box.forbes.comspecode.aiforum.bubble.io

Score adjustments−0.20 points in total

−0.08Vendor Lock-in: Users cannot export usable source code (HTML/CSS/JS) to host applications elsewhere. The export feature only provides JSON metadata usable within Bubble.bknddevelopment.com · severity 75/100
−0.05Pricing Unpredictability: The 'Workload Unit' pricing model has led to documented cases of massive, unexpected billing spikes due to accidental workflow loops or unoptimized logic.forum.bubble.io · severity 70/100
−0.07HIPAA Non-Compliance: Bubble does not sign Business Associate Agreements (BAA), making it unsuitable for handling Protected Health Information (PHI) directly without complex third-party workarounds.specode.ai · severity 65/100
02

Side by side

10 features across 8 products. Green is yes, red is no, grey is not published.

FeatureDudaMindStudioKnackRelevance AIWeWebFlowiseGlideBubble
Has Mobile App Web-only Web-only Web-only Web-only Web-only
Has Free Plan
Has Free Trial Contact for trial Contact for trial
Integrates With Zapier
Has Public API
Live Chat Support Email/Ticket only Email/Ticket only Email/Ticket only Email/Ticket only
SOC 2 or ISO Certified
Popular Integrations Google Analytics, Facebook, Instagram Zapier, Google Sheets, Mailchimp Airtable, Google Sheets, Zapier Custom integrations only Google Sheets, Zapier, Slack Stripe, Google Maps, Facebook
Supports SSO Enterprise plans only Enterprise plans only
Starting Price $14 per month $20 per month $39 per month Contact for pricing $24 per month $35 per month Free tier $29 per month
03

How we chose

Four fixed criteria for every product, plus two chosen for No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Marketing Agencies, weighted and reduced by documented penalties.

Full methodology
Criteria set for this categoryProduct Capability & Depth, Market Credibility & Trust Signals, Usability & Customer Experience, Value, Pricing & Transparency, Security, Compliance & Data Protection, Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
Evidence, then a scoreDocumentation, pricing pages, security pages and third-party reviews. Each criterion records what was found and links its sources.
Penalties, then a rankDocumented problems pull the score down with their evidence attached. Rank follows the score. Sponsored rows, where present, are labelled.
iVendors cannot buy a position. Every score rests on published evidence, documented problems pull it down, and a 9.1 here is not a 9.1 in another category.
Albert Richer
Albert RicherFounder · Memphis, TN

Sets the criteria and reviews the evidence before a ranking publishes. Email him if something here looks wrong.

04

Questions people ask

How does Duda perform on Google's Core Web Vitals?

Strongly. Search Engine Journal found 83.63% of websites built on Duda pass Core Web Vitals, the highest rate among major content management systems it tested in 2025.

What happens if an agency exports a Duda site?

Dynamic features like contact forms, personalization and analytics are lost on export, and the exported code cannot be imported back into Duda, so export is effectively a one-way move.

Does MindStudio mark up AI model costs?

No. MindStudio states it charges the exact same price as using your own API keys directly with the model provider, with no added markup.

What's the difference between MindStudio's Starter and Pro plans?

The $20/month Starter plan is limited to 5 agents with no API access. The $60/month Pro plan adds API and email triggers, scheduled runs, and MCP support.

Does Knack charge per user?

No. Knack offers unlimited users on every plan, from Starter through Enterprise, pricing instead by database records and storage used.

Is Knack suitable for healthcare data?

Yes. Knack undergoes HIPAA audits and offers a HIPAA-compliant version of the product that includes signing a Business Associate Agreement.

Does Relevance AI mark up AI costs?

No. The company passes the exact cost of AI usage, called Vendor Credits, directly to customers with no markup. Platform fees are billed separately from these pass-through AI model costs.

Does Relevance AI offer refunds?

Reviewers report a strict no-refund policy. One user requested a prorated refund after finding the tool did not fit their specific need, and the company declined. Confirm refund terms directly before committing to a paid plan.

How is the best No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Marketing Agencies decided?

Every product is scored on six criteria for this category, with cited evidence and documented penalties. Rank follows the overall score. Vendors cannot pay for a position.

How often is this ranking updated?

Products are re-scored when pricing, features or evidence change. This ranking was last updated August 12, 2026.

05

More in No-Code & Low-Code App Builders

4 related rankings.

All of No-Code & Low-Code App Builders
Research

80% of organizations will have policies for citizen developers by 2024

Jan 29, 2026

Just 1% of executives classify their companies as mature on the AI deployment spectrum

Apr 15, 2026

Grok 4 used 10x more compute than Grok 3 for only minor reasoning improvements

Apr 7, 2026