1. Home
  2. AI, Automation & Machine Learning
  3. No-Code & Low-Code App Builders
  4. No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Digital Marketing Agencies

Ranking · No-Code & Low-Code App Builders

Best No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Digital Marketing Agencies

10 products scored on six criteria. Duda leads at 9.1 and the field is tight, with 0.4 points between first and last, so read the catches before you pick. Every product opens to the evidence behind its number.

10 products scored6 criteria125 sources citedUpdated Jul 12, 2026
1 Dudaduda.co

Duda tops Core Web Vitals speed, skips a free plan

Read the reviewVisit ↗
2 MindStudiomindstudio.ai

MindStudio charges zero markup on 200+ AI models

Read the reviewVisit ↗
3 WeWebweweb.io

WeWeb exports full Vue.js code, but needs a backend

Read the reviewVisit ↗
10Products
8.7 to 9.1Score spread
6Free plan or tier
01

The ranking

Order follows the score. Six little boxes show each product's criterion scores: green or red is above or below the category average, grey means too few products share that criterion to compare. The full review sits right under each one.

Nothing matches that filter here. Tap All to see every product.

1

Duda

duda.co · Duda AI-Ready Website Platform · scored Dec 2025

Duda tops Core Web Vitals speed, skips a free plan

Best forAgencies managing many client sites who need speed and white labeling

From $14 per month no free planISO 27001white label
Top score

White label website builder for agencies with AI tools and fast page speed.

Standout factDuda passed Core Web Vitals on 84.87% of its sites in November 2025.searchenginejournal.com
Biggest catchEcommerce needs a paid add-on per site, and API access is limited to higher tiers.whoishostingthis.com
84.87%Core Web Vitals pass ratesearchenginejournal.com
$14/monthStarting priceduda.co

Standout number

84.87%of Duda sites pass Core Web Vitals

Source: searchenginejournal.com

Starting price

$14/monthno free plan, ecommerce is a paid add-on per site

Upside

  • #1 for Core Web Vitals speed
  • White label tools for agencies
  • AI content collection forms

Catch

  • No free plan
  • Ecommerce needs paid add-on
  • Limited third party plugins
Pick it ifAgencies managing many client sites who need speed and white labeling
Skip it ifDevelopers needing full server access or complex multi vendor stores
PricingFrom $14/month, no free plan

Editor's takeDuda built its reputation on speed. Search Engine Journal found 84.87% of Duda sites pass Core Web Vitals as of November 2025. There is no permanent free plan, and ecommerce runs as a paid add-on per site.

Does Duda have a free plan?

No. Pricing starts at $14 a month, per Duda's plans page. Ecommerce needs a separate paid add-on on every site, which can add up for agencies running many client sites.

Is Duda good for developers?

Only partly. Duda restricts API access and code export to its higher tier Agency and Custom plans. Developers wanting full backend control may prefer an open source platform instead.

The evidence: 6 criteria
9.2
Product Capability & Depthduda.coduda.co
9.0
Market Credibility & Trust Signals
9.3
Usability & Customer Experience
8.8
Value, Pricing & Transparencyduda.co
9.1
Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
9.0
Security, Compliance & Data Protection
2

MindStudio

mindstudio.ai · MindStudio AI Builder · scored Dec 2025

MindStudio charges zero markup on 200+ AI models

Best forNon-technical founders and agencies building AI agents quickly

Free tier From $20 per month free planSOC 2GDPR
−0.2 vs #1

No-code AI agent builder giving access to 200+ language models at provider cost.

Standout factMindStudio charges zero markup on 200+ AI models, so users pay provider prices.thevibemarketer.com
Biggest catchReal-time processing latency makes it better suited for batch tasks than instant responses.max-productive.ai
200+AI models availablefindmyaitool.io
150,000+Agents deployedmax-productive.ai
$20/moStarter planmindstudio.ai

Standout number

200+AI models, zero markup pricing

Source: findmyaitool.io

Plans

Free$0
Pro$60/mo

+usage

Source: mindstudio.ai

Upside

  • 200+ AI models, zero markup
  • SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant
  • Visual builder with custom code option

Catch

  • Real-time latency issues
  • Steep learning curve for advanced logic
  • Fewer native integrations than Zapier
Pick it ifNon-technical founders and agencies building AI agents quickly
Skip it ifDevelopers needing full code access or self-hosting
PricingFree plan, Starter $20/mo, Pro $60/mo, plus usage

Editor's takeMindStudio's zero markup pricing across 200+ models removes a common hidden cost in AI tool building. Its visual builder lowers the bar for non-technical teams while still allowing custom JavaScript or Python for edge cases. Latency on real-time tasks and a learning curve for advanced logic are the tradeoffs for that flexibility.

Does MindStudio charge extra for AI model usage?

No. MindStudio passes through exact provider prices for its 200+ supported AI models, with no added markup.

Is MindStudio suitable for real-time applications?

It works better for batch workflows. Reviewers note real-time processing latency, so instant, low-latency responses are not its strongest use case.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.15 points)
9.2
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex AI agents, the variety of supported models, and the depth of workflow customization available without code.MindStudio provides a visual builder supporting over 200 AI models (including GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini) without requiring separate API keys. It supports multi-step workflows, RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) from various data sources (PDF, CSV, etc.), and allows for custom JavaScript/Python functions for advanced logic.mindstudio.aimindstudio.aifindmyaitool.io
8.9
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the product's reputation, user base size, verified reviews, and adoption by reputable organizations.The platform reports over 150,000 agents deployed and maintains high ratings (4.7-5 stars) across major review platforms like G2 and Product Hunt. However, some growth strategies involve incentivized reviews, which is a common but notable practice.max-productive.aimax-productive.ai
8.8
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We analyze the learning curve, interface intuitiveness, and the quality of support and educational resources.Users praise the intuitive drag-and-drop interface for rapid prototyping but note a learning curve for advanced features. The platform offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and a 'MindStudio Architect' feature that auto-scaffolds agents from prompts.mindstudio.aimax-productive.aimax-productive.ai
9.4
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We examine pricing tiers, hidden costs, and the value proposition relative to competitors, specifically looking for markup on AI usage.MindStudio employs a subscription model ($20-$60/mo) combined with a 'zero markup' policy on AI model usage, passing provider costs directly to the user. This transparency and the elimination of separate API subscriptions offer significant value.mindstudio.aithevibemarketer.comfindmyaitool.io
8.7
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We evaluate the breadth of native integrations and connectivity with automation hubs like Zapier and Make.MindStudio offers native integrations with major tools (Google Drive, Slack, HubSpot) and connects to thousands of apps via Zapier and Make. While robust, it relies on these third-party connectors for niche tools rather than having a massive native library.zapier.comuniversity.mindstudio.ai
9.1
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We verify enterprise-grade security standards, compliance certifications (SOC 2, GDPR), and data handling policies.The platform is SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR compliant. It includes enterprise features like Single Sign-On (SSO), role-based access control, and data encryption, making it suitable for corporate environments.max-productive.aicobbai.com

Score adjustments−0.15 points in total

−0.07Real-time processing limitations make the platform better suited for batch operations than instant, low-latency responses.max-productive.ai · severity 50/100
−0.05Advanced logic and custom functionality often require JavaScript or Python knowledge, creating a barrier for purely non-technical users.selecthub.com · severity 45/100
−0.03The Starter plan limits (5 agents, 5,000 runs) are viewed as restrictive for active users, often necessitating an upgrade to the Pro plan.max-productive.ai · severity 40/100
3

WeWeb

weweb.io · WeWeb: AI & No-Code Web-Apps · scored Dec 2025

WeWeb exports full Vue.js code, but needs a backend

Best forDevelopers wanting a visual frontend paired with an external backend.

Free tier From $17 per month no-codeSOC 2ISO 27001
−0.2 vs #1

WeWeb is a no-code frontend builder that exports clean Vue.js code for self-hosting.

Standout factWeWeb generates standard Vue.js code that can be exported and self-hosted with unlimited traffic.pricing.weweb.io
Biggest catchWeWeb requires a separate backend subscription like Supabase or Xano, adding to total cost.nocodeassistant.agency
4.9/5G2 ratingg2.com
$17/moStarting priceweweb.io
Winter 2021Y Combinator batchycombinator.com

What reviewers say

G2
4.9/5

Source: g2.com

Compliance

✓ SOC 2 Type II✓ ISO 27001? HIPAA

Source: weweb.io

Upside

  • Full Vue.js code export, no lock-in
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001
  • Connects natively to Supabase, Xano

Catch

  • Needs separate backend subscription
  • Steeper learning curve than rivals
  • Documentation lags new features
Pick it ifDevelopers wanting a visual frontend paired with an external backend.
Skip it ifBeginners wanting an all-in-one database and frontend solution.
PricingFree plan available, paid plans from $17/mo plus backend costs

Editor's takeWeWeb generates standard Vue.js code that developers can export and self-host, avoiding the lock-in common to no-code tools. It backs this with SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification, plus enterprise clients like PwC. The tradeoff is complexity, since users say the tool demands real technical fluency with databases and APIs.

Does WeWeb lock developers into its platform?

No. WeWeb generates standard Vue.js code that can be exported and self-hosted with unlimited traffic on paid plans.

Does WeWeb include a backend or database?

No. WeWeb is backend agnostic and connects to services like Supabase, Xano, or any REST API, which require separate subscriptions.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.13 points)
9.1
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex, production-grade frontends, its code generation quality, and the depth of its visual editor features.WeWeb provides a pixel-perfect visual editor for Vue.js applications with full code export capabilities, allowing users to build complex logic, bind to any external backend (Supabase, Xano, REST), and deploy standard PWAs.weweb.ioweweb.ionocodefinder.com
9.3
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the company's funding, enterprise adoption, user sentiment, and stability in the no-code market.Backed by Y Combinator (W21), WeWeb serves major enterprise clients like PwC and Decathlon and maintains a high 4.9/5 rating on G2, signaling strong market trust.ycombinator.comweweb.iog2.com
8.7
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine the learning curve, quality of documentation, and the balance between visual ease-of-use and technical power.While powerful, WeWeb has a steeper learning curve than basic builders, requiring some understanding of databases and APIs, and documentation occasionally lags behind rapid feature releases.weweb.ioreddit.comg2.com
8.6
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze the pricing structure, free tier availability, and cost-to-value ratio compared to competitors like Bubble or Retool.Pricing is predictable based on sessions rather than complex workload units, with a generous free tier, though the requirement for a separate backend subscription adds to the total cost of ownership.weweb.ionocodeassistant.agencypricing.weweb.io
9.0
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We look for the breadth of native integrations, API connectivity, and the ability to work with modern tech stacks.WeWeb is 'backend agnostic,' offering deep native integrations with Supabase, Xano, and Airtable, while supporting any REST or GraphQL API, making it highly adaptable.weweb.ioweweb.ionocodefinder.com
9.2
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We evaluate security certifications, data handling practices, and suitability for regulated industries (HIPAA, GDPR).WeWeb is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliant, and its decoupled architecture allows for HIPAA compliance via self-hosting, as WeWeb does not store application data.weweb.ioweweb.iocommunity.weweb.io

Score adjustments−0.13 points in total

−0.05The platform demands 'technical fluency' and is not suitable for absolute beginners who do not understand databases or APIs.reddit.com · severity 50/100
−0.05Documentation can lag behind rapid feature releases, forcing users to rely on community forums or YouTube for the latest guidance.g2.com · severity 45/100
−0.03Users must pay for a separate backend service (like Xano or Supabase) in addition to WeWeb, increasing the total cost of ownership compared to all-in-one tools.nocodeassistant.agency · severity 40/100
4

Bubble

bubble.io · Bubble: AI No-Code App Builder · scored Dec 2025

4.7M apps built, but workload pricing can spike hard

Best forNon-technical founders building complex SaaS MVPs or marketplaces.

Free tier From $29 per month SOC 2GDPRno-code
−0.3 vs #1

Full-stack no-code platform for building web and native apps with built-in database and logic.

Standout factOver 4.7 million applications have been built on Bubble as of August 2025.research.contrary.com
Biggest catchA user reported a $1,000 surprise charge after using 7 million workload units in under 12 hours.forum.bubble.io
4.7M+Apps built on Bubbleresearch.contrary.com
$15B+User funding raisedresearch.contrary.com
$29/moStarting pricebubble.io

Adoption

4.7M+apps built on Bubble

Source: research.contrary.com

In their words

“7 million workload units used in less than 12 hours! A big fat auto charge bill on the credit card of $1000.”

forum.bubble.io

Upside

  • Full-stack: database, logic, frontend
  • SOC 2 Type II and GDPR
  • Massive plugin, template ecosystem

Catch

  • Workload Unit pricing can spike
  • Steep learning curve
  • No runnable code export
Pick it ifNon-technical founders building complex SaaS MVPs or marketplaces.
Skip it ifTeams needing simple internal tools or wanting to avoid platform lock-in.
PricingFrom $29/mo, Workload Unit pricing can spike with traffic or complexity

Editor's takeBubble lets non-developers build full-stack apps with a real database and workflow logic, and its users have collectively raised over $15 billion in funding. It is one of the few no-code platforms with SOC 2 Type II compliance, opening the door to regulated use cases. The risk lives in pricing: Bubble's Workload Unit model has triggered forum complaints about surprise bills, including one user hit with a $1,000 charge in under 12 hours.

Can I export my Bubble app as code?

No. G2 reviewers note Bubble only exports a proprietary JSON schema, not standalone runnable code, which creates vendor lock-in if you want to leave the platform.

Is Bubble pricing predictable?

Not always. Bubble's Workload Unit model has caused community backlash, and one forum post described a $1,000 surprise charge from 7 million workload units used in under 12 hours.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.23 points)
9.1
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex, full-stack applications including frontend design, backend logic, and database management without code.Bubble offers a comprehensive full-stack visual development environment that includes a built-in database, complex workflow logic, and a responsive design engine, recently expanding to include a native mobile app builder (beta).bubble.iobubble.iogoodspeed.studio
9.4
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the product's adoption rate, funding history, user base size, and validation by major enterprise clients or investors.Bubble is a dominant player in the no-code space with over 4.7 million apps built, a user base that has raised billions in funding, and adoption by companies ranging from startups to Fortune 500s.research.contrary.comresearch.contrary.comtracxn.com
8.6
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine the learning curve, user interface intuitiveness, and the quality of support and educational resources available to new users.While powerful, Bubble is widely cited as having a steep learning curve compared to other no-code tools, requiring significant time investment to master its logic and responsive design engine.bubble.ioblaze.techrapidevelopers.com
8.2
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze the pricing structure, cost predictability, and whether the features offered justify the expense at different scales.Bubble uses a 'Workload Unit' (WU) pricing model that has generated significant controversy due to unpredictability and potential for high costs as apps scale.bubble.iocodemap.ioforum.bubble.io
9.6
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We evaluate the platform's adherence to enterprise security standards, compliance certifications, and data protection measures.Bubble stands out in the no-code market with enterprise-grade security, including SOC 2 Type II compliance, GDPR readiness, and robust hosting on AWS.bubble.iobubble.iobubble.io
9.3
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We look for the ability to connect with third-party services, the quality of API tools, and the size of the plugin/template marketplace.The platform features a powerful API Connector that can integrate with any REST/JSON service, supported by a massive marketplace of plugins and templates.sidetool.comanual.bubble.iobubble.io

Score adjustments−0.23 points in total

−0.10Performance limitations and 'fragility' in large-scale applications have been documented, with users reporting lag when handling heavy logic or external databases.goodspeed.studio · severity 75/100
−0.05The 'Workload Unit' pricing model is criticized for unpredictability, where inefficient workflows can lead to massive, unexpected cost spikes.forum.bubble.io · severity 70/100
−0.08Significant vendor lock-in exists as users cannot export their applications as standalone, runnable code; exporting only provides a JSON schema proprietary to Bubble.g2.com · severity 60/100
5

Flowise

flowiseai.com · Flowise AI Builder · scored Dec 2025

Flowise self-hosts for free, patched a critical CVE

Best forDevelopers wanting a visual UI for LangChain and LLM workflows.

Free tier From $35 per month open-sourceself-hostedCVE patched
−0.3 vs #1

Open-source, low-code platform for visually building LLM orchestration flows and multi-agent AI systems.

Standout factFlowise has over 48,500 GitHub stars and 23,600 forks.github.com
Biggest catchA critical arbitrary file upload vulnerability, CVE-2025-26319, was found and patched.medium.com
48,500+GitHub starsgithub.com
23,600+GitHub forksgithub.com
$35/moCloud starter pricefindmyaitool.io

Standout number

48,500+GitHub stars

Source: github.com

In their words

“Flowise Pre-Auth Arbitrary File Upload (CVE-2025-26319)... allows unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files to the server”

medium.com

Upside

  • Open-source, free self-hosting
  • 100+ LangChain/LlamaIndex integrations
  • Multi-agent Agentflow orchestration

Catch

  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Documentation lacks advanced detail
  • Recent critical security vulnerability
Pick it ifDevelopers wanting a visual UI for LangChain and LLM workflows.
Skip it ifNon-technical users expecting a plug-and-play solution without setup.
PricingFree to self-host, cloud plans from $35/month

Editor's takeFlowise is fully free to self-host, backed by over 48,500 GitHub stars and near-daily commits. Its Agentflow builder supports multi-agent orchestration and Graph RAG, rivaling paid enterprise tools. Security took a hit in 2025 though, when researchers found and patched a critical file-upload vulnerability, CVE-2025-26319.

Is Flowise free?

Yes, self-hosting the open-source version is free on your own infrastructure. The managed cloud service starts at $35 per month for unlimited flows.

Did Flowise have a security vulnerability?

Yes. A critical arbitrary file upload vulnerability, CVE-2025-26319, let unauthenticated attackers upload files to the server. It has since been patched.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.21 points)
9.1
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the breadth of visual building tools, LLM orchestration features, and support for complex agentic workflows.Flowise offers a comprehensive visual interface for building LLM apps, supporting both single-agent (Chatflow) and multi-agent (Agentflow) architectures with RAG capabilities.docs.flowiseai.comdocs.flowiseai.com
9.5
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess open-source traction, community activity, and adoption by developers and enterprises.Flowise is a highly popular open-source project with massive GitHub traction, indicating a vibrant community and widespread adoption.github.comgithub.com
8.6
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine the ease of use for non-technical users, quality of documentation, and availability of support.While the drag-and-drop UI is intuitive, the platform has a steep learning curve for non-coders and documentation is often cited as insufficient for advanced needs.reddit.comflowise-ai.tenereteam.com
9.3
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze the pricing model, free tier limitations, and overall value proposition compared to competitors.The open-source version is completely free for self-hosting, while the managed cloud service offers clear, competitive pricing tiers.flowiseai.comfindmyaitool.iogithub.com
9.4
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We look for the variety of supported LLMs, vector databases, and third-party tools available within the builder.Flowise excels with over 100 integrations, leveraging the LangChain and LlamaIndex ecosystems to connect with virtually any modern AI tool.docs.flowiseai.comdocs.flowiseai.com
8.2
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We evaluate security features, vulnerability management, and enterprise compliance capabilities.While offering enterprise features like SSO and RBAC, the platform recently faced a critical vulnerability and issues with insecure default configurations.medium.comdocs.flowiseai.com

Score adjustments−0.21 points in total

−0.09Critical arbitrary file upload vulnerability (CVE-2025-26319) allowed unauthenticated remote code execution (Patched).medium.com · severity 85/100
−0.07Research found many self-hosted instances exposed to the public internet without authentication by default.upguard.com · severity 65/100
−0.05Users report documentation is lacking in detail for advanced modules and specific use cases.reddit.com · severity 50/100
6

Power Apps

microsoft.com · Microsoft Power Apps · scored Dec 2025

Power Apps caps non-delegable queries at 2,000 records

Best forEnterprises already deeply integrated into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem

From $5 per user/mo Gartner Leader 7 years2000-record limit1000+ connectors
−0.3 vs #1

Low-code platform with 1,000+ connectors and AI Copilot, built on the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.

Standout factPower Apps limits local data processing to 500 records by default, expandable to 2,000, for non-delegable queries.learn.microsoft.com
Biggest catchQueries that cannot be delegated to the server are hard-capped at retrieving 2,000 records, which can lead to incomplete data results.learn.microsoft.com
56M+Monthly active usersmicrosoft.com
1,000+Data connectors availablemicrosoft.com

Standout number

56M+monthly active users on Power Platform

Source: microsoft.com

Plans

Per User$20/user/mo

Unlimited apps

Source: skysoftconnections.com

Upside

  • 1,000+ pre-built data connectors
  • AI Copilot generates apps and screens
  • 56M+ monthly active users

Catch

  • 2,000-record delegation limit
  • Premium connectors cost extra
  • Complex apps can lag on mobile
Pick it ifEnterprises already deeply integrated into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem
Skip it ifStartups building external B2C SaaS products
PricingPer App from $5/user/mo; Per User from $20/user/mo

Editor's takePower Apps connects to more than 1,000 data sources and now ships AI Copilot for generating data models and screens from natural language. It has been a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for seven straight years with 56 million monthly active users. Its biggest technical limit is a hard cap of 2,000 records on non-delegable queries, and premium connectors like SQL Server or Dataverse trigger separate licensing costs.

How much does Power Apps cost?

The Per App plan is $5 per user a month for one app. The Per User plan is $20 per user a month for unlimited apps, with premium connectors billed separately.

What is the Power Apps delegation limit?

Queries that cannot be delegated to the server are capped at 500 records by default, expandable to 2,000, which can cause incomplete results on large datasets.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.17 points)
9.5
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the breadth of features, low-code tools, AI integration, and connectivity options available for building business applications.Microsoft Power Apps offers a comprehensive low-code suite with over 1,000 connectors, AI-driven Copilot features, and dual development modes (Canvas and Model-driven) to suit both citizen and professional developers.learn.microsoft.commicrosoft.comlowcodepower.com
9.8
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess market leadership, user adoption rates, and recognition from major industry analyst firms.Microsoft is a dominant force in the industry, recognized as a Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for seven consecutive years and boasting over 56 million monthly active users.microsoft.commicrosoft.commicrosoft.com
8.8
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine the ease of use for non-developers, the quality of the design interface, and collaboration features.The platform offers a familiar drag-and-drop interface similar to PowerPoint and Excel, with recent updates adding real-time co-authoring and Git integration for team collaboration.powerusers.microsoft.comyoutube.comlearn.microsoft.com
8.2
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze pricing structures, licensing flexibility, and hidden costs associated with premium features.Pricing is tiered with 'Per App' ($5/user/mo) and 'Per User' ($20/user/mo) options, but costs increase significantly when premium connectors or Dataverse storage are required.powerapps.microsoft.comskysoftconnections.comskysoftconnections.com
9.2
Security, Compliance & GovernanceLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to secure data, manage user access, and comply with enterprise standards.Power Apps provides enterprise-grade governance through Managed Environments, granular Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policies, and compliance with major standards like GDPR and HIPAA.lowcodepower.comlearn.microsoft.comcloudthat.com
7.8
Scalability & PerformanceLooked for: We investigate the platform's ability to handle large datasets, complex logic, and high user concurrency.While capable of enterprise scale, the platform enforces a strict delegation limit (500-2000 records) for non-delegable queries, which can hinder performance with large datasets.microsoft.comlearn.microsoft.comblaze.tech

Score adjustments−0.17 points in total

−0.08Delegation Limit: Queries that cannot be delegated to the server are hard-capped at retrieving 500 records (configurable to 2000), which can lead to incomplete data results in large datasets.learn.microsoft.com · severity 75/100
−0.04Licensing Complexity: Users often face confusion and unexpected costs regarding 'Premium' connectors (e.g., SQL, Dataverse) versus 'Standard' connectors (e.g., SharePoint), as premium features trigger higher licensing tiers.powergi.net · severity 60/100
−0.05Performance Degradation: Complex apps with heavy logic or large data sources can experience significant slowness, particularly on mobile devices or during the build/test process.g2.com · severity 50/100
7

Relevance AI

relevanceai.com · scored Dec 2025

Relevance AI builds agent teams, refunds are off the table

Best forSales and ops teams automating outbound outreach and lead qualification.

From $19 per month multi-agent workforcevector database memorySOC 2 Type II
−0.3 vs #1

No-code platform for building multi-agent AI workforces with a built-in vector database for memory.

Standout factRelevance AI has raised $37 million across three funding rounds, including a $24 million Series B led by Bessemer Venture Partners.tracxn.com
Biggest catchThe company enforces a strict no-refund policy, and G2 reviewers report requests for prorated refunds being denied.g2.com
$37MTotal funding raisedtracxn.com
$19/moPro plan starting pricerelevanceai.com
9,000+Available toolsg2.com

By the numbers

$37Mtotal funding raised
9,000+integrations and tools available
$19Pro plan starting price/mo

Source: tracxn.com

In their words

“No prorated refunds. Stay away! Requested a prorated refund when we found it wouldn't work for our specific need. The company refused”

g2.com

Upside

  • Visual Workforce builder for agent teams
  • Built-in vector database for memory
  • SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant

Catch

  • Strict no-refund policy
  • Credit vs. action pricing is complex
  • Support response delays reported
Pick it ifSales and ops teams automating outbound outreach and lead qualification.
Skip it ifUsers looking for a simple, single-purpose chatbot.
PricingPro plan from $19/mo, split Actions and Vendor Credits pricing

Editor's takeRelevance AI solves the memory problem that trips up many autonomous agents by pairing its visual Workforce builder with a built-in vector database, so agents retain context across tasks. Backing from Bessemer Venture Partners as part of $37 million raised, plus SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance, support its enterprise push. The friction points are commercial, since the credit-based pricing splits Actions from Vendor Credits in a way users call hard to estimate, and the no-refund policy has drawn specific complaints.

How does Relevance AI's pricing work?

Costs split into 'Actions' for what agents do and 'Vendor Credits' for underlying AI model costs, with no markup on Vendor Credits. The Pro plan starts at $19 per month, according to the company's own pricing page.

Can I get a refund from Relevance AI?

Not typically. G2 reviewers report the company enforces a strict no-refund policy and has denied requests for prorated refunds even when the tool didn't fit their needs.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.12 points)
9.2
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build, orchestrate, and deploy autonomous AI agents with long-term memory and complex reasoning capabilities.Relevance AI combines a low-code 'Workforce' builder for multi-agent orchestration with a built-in vector database, allowing agents to retain context and execute complex, non-deterministic workflows across various LLMs.relevanceai.comrelevanceai.comrelevanceai.com
9.0
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the company's funding history, investor backing, and adoption by reputable enterprise clients.The company has raised $37M total, including a recent $24M Series B led by Bessemer Venture Partners, and serves major enterprise clients like SafetyCulture and Activision.bvp.comtracxn.combvp.com
8.6
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine user feedback regarding the learning curve, interface design, and quality of customer support.While the 'Invent' feature is praised for ease of use, users report a learning curve for complex multi-agent systems and frustration with support responsiveness.relevanceai.comtoolfountain.comreply.io
8.4
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze the pricing model, transparency of costs, and flexibility of contract terms.Pricing is tiered with a free entry point, but the credit-based model (splitting Actions and Vendor Credits) is viewed as complex, and the refund policy is strictly non-prorated.relevanceai.comrelevanceai.comrelevanceai.com
8.9
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We evaluate the breadth of native integrations and the ability to connect with external tools and APIs.Relevance AI claims access to over 9,000 tools and integrates natively with major platforms like Slack, Google Sheets, and HubSpot, plus a visual builder for custom API tools.relevanceai.comzapier.comsdrindex.com
9.3
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We verify enterprise-grade security certifications, data handling practices, and compliance with global standards.The platform maintains SOC 2 Type II certification and GDPR compliance, offering enterprise features like SSO, RBAC, and private cloud deployment options.relevanceai.comrelevanceai.comrelevanceai.com

Score adjustments−0.12 points in total

−0.04Strict no-refund policy has led to negative user reviews, with customers reporting denied requests for prorated refunds even after finding the tool unsuitable.g2.com · severity 60/100
−0.05Users have reported delays in customer support response times and a lack of personalized assistance for troubleshooting.reply.io · severity 50/100
−0.03The credit-based pricing model (splitting Actions and Vendor Credits) is described by some users as complex and difficult to estimate at scale.smartbottips.com · severity 40/100
8

Glide

glideapps.com · Glide No-Code AI App Builder · scored Dec 2025

Glide handles 10M rows, can't publish to app stores

Best forOperations teams building internal tools from spreadsheets

Free tier From $32 per month SOC 2 Type 2spreadsheet-to-appno App Store publishing
−0.4 vs #1

No-code AI app builder turning spreadsheets into business apps, scaling to 10 million rows.

Standout factBig Tables support up to 10 million rows, far above the standard 25,000-row limit.glideapps.com
Biggest catchGlide apps are Progressive Web Apps and cannot be published to the Apple App Store or Google Play without unsupported third-party wrappers.help.glideapps.com
$32/moPro planglideapps.com
$199/moBusiness plan (30 users)help.glideapps.com
10MBig Tables row limitglideapps.com

Standout number

10Mrows supported via Big Tables

Source: glideapps.com

Starting price

$32/moPro plan; Business adds per-user fees past 30 seats

Upside

  • SOC 2 Type 2 certified security
  • Supports up to 10 million rows
  • Built-in AI for content generation

Catch

  • No native App Store publishing
  • Expensive per-user pricing at scale
  • US-only data hosting, no EU
Pick it ifOperations teams building internal tools from spreadsheets
Skip it ifStartups building consumer apps for the App Store
PricingFree plan; Pro from $32/mo; Business $199/mo (30 users, $5/extra user)

Editor's takeGlide turns a Google Sheet into a working app with an interface reviewers call insanely gorgeous, and its Big Tables scale to 10 million rows, well past the standard 25,000-row cap. It also holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification, rare in the no-code space. Two limits matter for planning though. Apps stay Progressive Web Apps with no official app store listing, and the Business plan's per-user fees climb once a team passes 30 seats.

Can I publish a Glide app to the Apple App Store?

Not officially. Glide apps are Progressive Web Apps and cannot be published to traditional app stores without unsupported third-party wrappers.

How many rows of data can Glide handle?

Up to 10 million with Big Tables, compared to a 25,000-row limit on standard Glide Tables.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.17 points)
8.8
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex applications, including AI features, database scalability, and deployment options.Glide excels at turning spreadsheets into AI-powered apps with a visual builder, supporting up to 10 million rows via Big Tables, though it relies on Progressive Web App (PWA) technology rather than native mobile binaries.glideapps.comglideapps.comhelp.glideapps.com
9.3
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the vendor's industry standing, security certifications, and adoption by reputable enterprise clients.Glide demonstrates exceptional credibility with SOC 2 Type 2 certification, a G2 Leader status, and adoption by major enterprises like Costco and Whirlpool.glideapps.comglideapps.comglideapps.com
9.1
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We examine the ease of use for non-technical builders, quality of templates, and user satisfaction with the interface.The platform is widely praised for its 'insanely gorgeous' templates and intuitive drag-and-drop interface that requires zero coding skills.glideapps.comadalo.comg2.com
8.2
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We analyze pricing structures, plan limits, and hidden costs relative to the features provided.While powerful, Glide's pricing model has faced criticism for high per-user costs on public apps and significant structural changes that frustrated legacy users.glideapps.comhelp.glideapps.comnocode.mba
8.9
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We evaluate data residency options, compliance with regulations like GDPR, and security features like SSO.Glide maintains high security standards with SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR compliance, but lacks EU data residency options as servers are US-based.glideapps.comglideapps.comglideapps.com
8.8
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We review the breadth of third-party integrations, API availability, and supported data sources.The platform supports robust integrations with tools like Salesforce, Stripe, and SQL databases, along with a comprehensive API for custom connections.glideapps.comglideapps.comadalo.com

Score adjustments−0.17 points in total

−0.08Glide apps are Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) and cannot be published directly to the Apple App Store or Google Play Store without using unsupported third-party wrappers.help.glideapps.com · severity 60/100
−0.04The pricing model charges per-user fees on higher plans (e.g., $5/user/month), which can make scaling public-facing applications prohibitively expensive compared to flat-rate competitors.nocode.mba · severity 55/100
−0.05All data is hosted on servers in the United States, with no option for EU data residency, which may pose compliance challenges for strict GDPR requirements.blog.boldtech.dev · severity 45/100
9

Horizons

hostinger.com · Horizons No-Code AI Builder · scored Dec 2025

Horizons burns AI credits even when it errors out

Best forSolopreneurs wanting to build and host a web app via chat

Free tier From $7 per month no-codeAI app buildercode export
−0.4 vs #1

AI no-code builder that turns chat prompts into full-stack web apps, with hosting and code export included.

Standout factPaid plans let users fully own and download their code at any timehostinger.com
Biggest catchAI credits are consumed even when the tool produces errors or fails to complete a task.reddit.com
4M+Hostinger's global clientshostinger.com
$6.99/moIntro pricesaasworthy.com
30-400/moMessage limit rangestewartgauld.com

In their words

“I've now burned through my 70 messages for the month with nothing to show for it... Apparently I cannot get a refund because I have used too many messages.”

reddit.com

What changed

100%price increase from intro to renewal rate

Source: saasworthy.com

Upside

  • Full-stack app generation via chat
  • Hosting and domain included
  • Code export on paid plans

Catch

  • Credits used even on AI errors
  • Renewal price doubles after intro
  • No native mobile app output
Pick it ifSolopreneurs wanting to build and host a web app via chat
Skip it ifDevelopers needing GitHub sync or teams wanting native mobile apps
PricingFrom $6.99/mo intro, renews at $13.99/mo, 30-400 messages/mo by tier

Editor's takeHorizons turns a chat prompt into a working Node.js and React app, then hosts it, a rare bundle for a no-code tool. Paid plans also let users download and keep their code, avoiding the usual lock-in. The credit system is the pain point though, since Reddit users report burning through a month's message allowance on errors with no refund, and renewal prices jump well above the intro rate.

Does Horizons refund AI credits used on errors?

No. Users report credits are consumed even when the AI produces an error or fails the task, and Hostinger does not refund used messages.

Can I export the code Horizons generates?

Yes, on any paid plan. Free or trial users cannot export code; it is treated as a premium feature.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.18 points)
9.0
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the AI's ability to generate functional web applications, the breadth of supported features, and the quality of the underlying code structure.Horizons builds full-stack web applications using Node.js and React, supporting 80+ languages and voice prompts. It handles frontend design and backend logic, though it is limited to web apps (PWAs) and cannot generate native mobile binaries for app stores.hostinger.comhostinger.comtechradar.com
9.2
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the vendor's reputation, user base size, and reliability based on established industry presence and verified user feedback.Backed by Hostinger, a major hosting provider with over 4 million clients, Horizons benefits from strong infrastructure reliability. While the core brand is highly trusted, the Horizons tool itself is newer, with some users reporting 'beta-like' behavior in complex scenarios.hostinger.comhostinger.comreddit.com
8.9
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We analyze the ease of the 'vibe coding' interface, the quality of AI interactions, and the effectiveness of support channels.The chat-based interface is highly intuitive for non-coders, allowing app creation via natural language. However, the credit-based system can be frustrating, as users report credits are consumed even when the AI produces errors or fails to execute a task correctly.hostinger.comtechradar.comreddit.com
8.5
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We examine the pricing structure, renewal rates, and the value of included resources like hosting and AI credits.Entry pricing is competitive ($6.99/mo), but renewal rates increase significantly (e.g., to $13.99/mo or more). The plan includes hosting, which adds value, but the strict AI credit limits (30-400/mo) can be restrictive for iterative development.hostinger.comsaasworthy.comhostinger.com
8.7
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to connect with external databases, payment gateways, and third-party services.Horizons supports essential integrations like Stripe for payments and Supabase for backend databases. However, these must be set up via AI prompts rather than a visual plugin marketplace, which can introduce complexity.hostinger.comhostinger.com
8.8
Developer Experience & Code FlexibilityLooked for: We assess the level of access to the underlying code, export capabilities, and freedom from vendor lock-in.Unlike many no-code tools, Horizons allows code export on paid plans and offers a code editor on higher tiers. This 'vibe coding' approach bridges the gap between no-code and low-code, though GitHub import is currently unsupported.hostinger.comreddit.com

Score adjustments−0.18 points in total

−0.08AI credits are consumed even when the tool produces errors or fails to complete a task, leading to wasted quota.reddit.com · severity 75/100
−0.04Renewal prices for plans are significantly higher (often double) than the introductory promotional rates.hostinger.com · severity 60/100
−0.06The platform cannot generate native mobile app binaries (APK/IPA) for app stores; it is limited to web apps/PWAs.hostinger.com · severity 45/100
10

Knack

knack.com · Knack: No-Code Application Platform · scored Dec 2025

Knack charges unlimited users, caps out at 20k records

Best forOps teams building internal database apps needing HIPAA/SOC 2

From $59 per month HIPAASOC 2 Type 2unlimited users
−0.4 vs #1

No-code database app builder with HIPAA and SOC 2 compliance, billed by records not users.

Standout factKnack reports a 92% customer retention rate.knack.com
Biggest catchThere is no native mobile app builder, only mobile-responsive web apps.geekflare.com
92%Customer retention rateknack.com
20,000Starting records includeddocs.knack.com

Standout number

92%customer retention rate

Source: knack.com

Plans

Corporate$300/mo

125,000 records

Enterprise

HIPAA/GovCloud, 2.5M+ records

Source: docs.knack.com

Upside

  • Unlimited users on every plan
  • HIPAA and SOC 2 Type 2
  • Strong relational database features

Catch

  • No native mobile app builder
  • Slower with large datasets
  • No visual automation builder
Pick it ifOps teams building internal database apps needing HIPAA/SOC 2
Skip it ifBuilders wanting native mobile apps or visual automation
PricingFrom $59/mo for 20,000 records, unlimited users on every plan

Editor's takeKnack charges by database records instead of by seat, so every plan includes unlimited users, a rare structure in the no-code space. It backs that with SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA compliance, including a signed BAA, and reports 92% customer retention. It skips native mobile apps in favor of responsive web apps, and reviewers report slower load times on complex, data-heavy applications.

How does Knack pricing work?

Knack charges based on database records, not user seats, so every plan includes unlimited users. The Starter plan begins around $59 a month for 20,000 records.

Does Knack build mobile apps?

Not natively. Knack produces mobile-responsive web apps rather than downloadable iOS or Android apps, which is a gap compared to some competitors.

The evidence: 6 criteria, 3 penalties (−0.19 points)
8.7
Product Capability & DepthLooked for: We evaluate the platform's ability to build complex, relational database applications without code, including logic, views, and mobile accessibility.Knack excels at relational database management with granular user roles, but lacks a native mobile app builder and visual automation interface.prnewswire.comgeekflare.comgeekflare.com
9.2
Market Credibility & Trust SignalsLooked for: We assess the vendor's reliability through compliance certifications, customer retention, and adoption by reputable organizations.Knack demonstrates exceptional credibility with SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance, backed by a 92% customer retention rate.baytechconsulting.comknack.comcomparecamp.com
8.9
Usability & Customer ExperienceLooked for: We look for ease of use for non-technical builders, interface modernity, and the quality of customer support.Users find the platform intuitive for non-techies and praise the support, though some reviews cite slow loading times for complex apps.g2.comg2.comg2.com
8.5
Value, Pricing & TransparencyLooked for: We evaluate pricing models, hidden costs, and value for money relative to feature limits like records and storage.Knack offers a unique unlimited user model that provides high value for teams, though record limits and storage costs can escalate.knack.comyoutube.comdocs.knack.com
8.8
Integrations & Ecosystem StrengthLooked for: We analyze the platform's ability to connect with other tools via API, native integrations, and middleware support.Knack provides an open API and strong middleware support (Zapier, Make), though native integrations are often routed through these third-party tools.zapier.comknack.comdocs.knack.com
9.0
Security, Compliance & Data ProtectionLooked for: We examine the platform's adherence to strict data security standards like HIPAA, GDPR, and SOC 2, which are critical for business apps.Knack offers enterprise-grade security including HIPAA compliance (with BAA), SOC 2 Type 2 certification, and GDPR compliance.knack.combaytechconsulting.combaytechconsulting.com

Score adjustments−0.19 points in total

−0.06Users consistently report slow loading times and performance lags when dealing with complex applications or large datasets.g2.com · severity 60/100
−0.07The platform lacks a native mobile app builder, limiting output to mobile-responsive web apps (PWAs) rather than downloadable iOS/Android apps.geekflare.com · severity 50/100
−0.06Automation setup lacks a visual drag-and-drop interface, relying instead on rule-based logic that can feel technical for non-developers.geekflare.com · severity 45/100
02

Side by side

10 features across 10 products. Green is yes, red is no, grey is not published.

FeatureDudaMindStudioWeWebBubbleFlowisePower AppsRelevance AIGlideHorizonsKnack
Has Mobile App Web-only Web-only Web-only Web-only Web-only Web-only Web-only Web-only
Has Free Plan
Has Free Trial Contact for trial
Integrates With Zapier
Has Public API
Live Chat Support Email/Ticket only Email/Ticket only Email/Ticket only Email/Ticket only Email/Ticket only
SOC 2 or ISO Certified Both
Popular Integrations Google Workspace, Mailchimp, HubSpot Slack, Salesforce, Google Workspace Slack, Google Analytics, Stripe Stripe, Google Maps, PayPal Custom integrations only Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, Azure HubSpot, Microsoft 365, Google Analytics Google Sheets, Airtable, Zapier Custom integrations only Zapier, Google Workspace, Salesforce
Supports SSO Enterprise plans only Enterprise plans only Enterprise plans only
Starting Price $14 per month $20 per month $17 per month $29 per month $35 per month $5 per user/mo $19 per month $32 per month $7 per month $59 per month
03

How we chose

Four fixed criteria for every product, plus two chosen for No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Digital Marketing Agencies, weighted and reduced by documented penalties.

Full methodology
Criteria set for this categoryProduct Capability & Depth, Market Credibility & Trust Signals, Usability & Customer Experience, Value, Pricing & Transparency, Integrations & Ecosystem Strength, Security, Compliance & Data Protection
Evidence, then a scoreDocumentation, pricing pages, security pages and third-party reviews. Each criterion records what was found and links its sources.
Penalties, then a rankDocumented problems pull the score down with their evidence attached. Rank follows the score. Sponsored rows, where present, are labelled.
iVendors cannot buy a position. Every score rests on published evidence, documented problems pull it down, and a 9.1 here is not a 9.1 in another category.
Albert Richer
Albert RicherFounder · Memphis, TN

Sets the criteria and reviews the evidence before a ranking publishes. Email him if something here looks wrong.

04

Questions people ask

Does Duda have a free plan?

No. Pricing starts at $14 a month, per Duda's plans page. Ecommerce needs a separate paid add-on on every site, which can add up for agencies running many client sites.

Is Duda good for developers?

Only partly. Duda restricts API access and code export to its higher tier Agency and Custom plans. Developers wanting full backend control may prefer an open source platform instead.

Does MindStudio charge extra for AI model usage?

No. MindStudio passes through exact provider prices for its 200+ supported AI models, with no added markup.

Is MindStudio suitable for real-time applications?

It works better for batch workflows. Reviewers note real-time processing latency, so instant, low-latency responses are not its strongest use case.

Does WeWeb lock developers into its platform?

No. WeWeb generates standard Vue.js code that can be exported and self-hosted with unlimited traffic on paid plans.

Does WeWeb include a backend or database?

No. WeWeb is backend agnostic and connects to services like Supabase, Xano, or any REST API, which require separate subscriptions.

Can I export my Bubble app as code?

No. G2 reviewers note Bubble only exports a proprietary JSON schema, not standalone runnable code, which creates vendor lock-in if you want to leave the platform.

Is Bubble pricing predictable?

Not always. Bubble's Workload Unit model has caused community backlash, and one forum post described a $1,000 surprise charge from 7 million workload units used in under 12 hours.

How is the best No-Code & Low-Code AI Builders for Digital Marketing Agencies decided?

Every product is scored on six criteria for this category, with cited evidence and documented penalties. Rank follows the overall score. Vendors cannot pay for a position.

How often is this ranking updated?

Products are re-scored when pricing, features or evidence change. This ranking was last updated July 12, 2026.

05

More in No-Code & Low-Code App Builders

4 related rankings.

All of No-Code & Low-Code App Builders
Research

80% of organizations will have policies for citizen developers by 2024

Jan 29, 2026

Just 1% of executives classify their companies as mature on the AI deployment spectrum

Apr 15, 2026

Grok 4 used 10x more compute than Grok 3 for only minor reasoning improvements

Apr 7, 2026