Finding the Right Collaboration Hub: Insights from Users and Experts Alike When it comes to choosing a collaboration hub for product and engineering teams, customer reviews show that flexibility and integration capabilities often top the list of must-have features. For instance, many users report that platforms like Slack and Microsoft Teams excel in integrating with other tools, making daily workflows smoother. Research suggests that teams prioritize real-time collaboration options, with 73% of respondents in a recent study indicating they value instant messaging capabilities. On the flip side, while flashy interfaces can be tempting, expert analysis frequently points out that ease of use is far more important than aesthetic appeal. Brands like Asana and Trello consistently receive praise for their user-friendly designs, ensuring that teams can hit the ground running without a steep learning curve. And if you think all collaboration tools are created equal, think again—many consumers report that they often overlook critical features like task management and file sharing, which can significantly impact productivity.Finding the Right Collaboration Hub: Insights from Users and Experts Alike When it comes to choosing a collaboration hub for product and engineering teams, customer reviews show that flexibility and integration capabilities often top the list of must-have features.Finding the Right Collaboration Hub: Insights from Users and Experts Alike When it comes to choosing a collaboration hub for product and engineering teams, customer reviews show that flexibility and integration capabilities often top the list of must-have features. For instance, many users report that platforms like Slack and Microsoft Teams excel in integrating with other tools, making daily workflows smoother. Research suggests that teams prioritize real-time collaboration options, with 73% of respondents in a recent study indicating they value instant messaging capabilities. On the flip side, while flashy interfaces can be tempting, expert analysis frequently points out that ease of use is far more important than aesthetic appeal. Brands like Asana and Trello consistently receive praise for their user-friendly designs, ensuring that teams can hit the ground running without a steep learning curve. And if you think all collaboration tools are created equal, think again—many consumers report that they often overlook critical features like task management and file sharing, which can significantly impact productivity. Interestingly, market research shows that while budget can be a concern, many effective tools are available at various price points, catering to both startups and established enterprises. For example, companies like ClickUp offer robust free versions that many teams find meet their needs well before committing to paid plans. So, why settle for less when there are options that can fit both your budget and your team's workflow? Just remember, choosing the right hub is less about the bells and whistles and more about finding a tool that aligns with your team's specific needs—no one wants to spend their budget on a tool that looks great but leaves them frustrated!
Zenhub is a collaboration hub specifically designed for software development teams. It caters to the unique needs of product owners, developers, and managers, providing them a platform to cross-collaborate and gain visibility into software projects. Its features are designed to streamline project management, boost productivity and facilitate communication.
Zenhub is a collaboration hub specifically designed for software development teams. It caters to the unique needs of product owners, developers, and managers, providing them a platform to cross-collaborate and gain visibility into software projects. Its features are designed to streamline project management, boost productivity and facilitate communication.
REAL-TIME INNOVATOR
SECURITY SENTINEL
Best for teams that are
Agile software teams who want to manage projects directly within GitHub
Developers seeking to minimize context switching between code and project tasks
Teams needing automated sprint planning based on GitHub Issues
Skip if
Non-technical departments (marketing, sales) that do not use GitHub
Engineering teams using GitLab or Bitbucket as their primary repository
Organizations looking for a general-purpose project management tool
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Zenhub is unique in its ability to transform GitHub into a full-featured project management suite without forcing developers to leave their code. Research indicates that its 'native' integration significantly reduces context switching, a major productivity killer. Based on documented features like AI-generated acceptance criteria and automated sprint planning, it effectively bridges the gap between developer workflows and management reporting needs.
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.8/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Collaboration Hubs for Product & Engineering Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.1
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of agile management tools, including roadmapping, sprint planning, and reporting features specifically for software development.
What We Found
Zenhub offers deep agile capabilities including automated sprint planning, multi-repository boards, planning poker, and AI-powered acceptance criteria generation.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the comprehensive suite of agile tools that rival standalone platforms like Jira, enhanced by unique AI automation features.
Supporting Evidence
The platform includes AI-powered features like AI-generated acceptance criteria, AI-suggested labels, and automated sprint reviews. Features like AI-generated acceptance criteria and AI-suggested labels save time and keep things consistent across your organization.
— zenhub.com
Zenhub provides multi-level project management allowing management of Sub-issue-based Objectives, Projects, Epics, Tasks, and Sub-tasks. Seamlessly manage Sub-issue-based Objectives → Projects → Epics → Tasks → Sub-tasks in perfect harmony with GitHub.
— github.com
Features robust project management tools such as task boards and burndown charts, enhancing project tracking capabilities.
— zenhub.com
Integrates seamlessly with GitHub, allowing project management within the codebase, as documented on the official Zenhub website.
— zenhub.com
9.3
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the product's adoption by reputable organizations, user ratings on major review platforms, and longevity in the market.
What We Found
Zenhub is trusted by major enterprises like NASA and Microsoft, holds a strong 4.3/5 rating on G2, and maintains SOC 2 Type II certification.
Score Rationale
High credibility is established through its usage by industry giants and consistent positive feedback from the developer community.
Supporting Evidence
Zenhub maintains a 4.3 out of 5 star rating based on user reviews on G2. 4.3 out of 5 stars
— g2.com
Major organizations including NASA, Comcast, Nikkei, and Microsoft use Zenhub for their software teams. Teams at companies like NASA, Comcast, Nikkei, and Microsoft leverage Zenhub to streamline their GitHub processes
— github.com
8.7
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We look for ease of use, interface responsiveness, and how well the tool integrates into existing developer workflows without friction.
What We Found
The browser extension provides a seamless 'native' feel within GitHub, though some users report performance lag on very large boards.
Score Rationale
While the developer experience is superior due to GitHub integration, reported UI glitches and loading delays on large datasets prevent a perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
Users have reported that the product can be slow when dealing with large boards. The product can be a bit slow but it might be due to the size of our boards.
— softwarefinder.com
Zenhub is the only project management tool that integrates natively within the GitHub user interface. Zenhub is the only project management tool natively integrated within GitHub's user interface.
— github.com
Offers a user-friendly interface designed specifically for developers, enhancing usability within software teams.
— zenhub.com
8.9
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate the pricing structure, availability of free tiers, and transparency of costs for scaling teams.
What We Found
Zenhub offers a generous free plan and a transparently priced Team plan at $8.33/user/mo, which is competitive against Jira and Linear.
Score Rationale
The pricing is clear and affordable, with a high-value free tier, though enterprise pricing remains 'contact us' which is standard but less transparent.
Supporting Evidence
A free plan is available for small teams and includes essential features. Free plan designed for small teams... $0 per user /mo
— zenhub.com
The Team plan is priced at $8.33 per user per month when billed annually. $8.33 per user /mo Billed yearly
— zenhub.com
Provides flexible pricing options with a free plan for small teams and premium plans starting at $6.75/user/month.
— zenhub.com
9.5
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We examine the depth of integration with the primary platform (GitHub) and connections to other critical development tools.
What We Found
Zenhub's integration with GitHub is unmatched in depth, effectively becoming part of the UI, alongside robust connections to Slack and Figma.
Score Rationale
This score is near-perfect because it doesn't just integrate; it embeds itself into the GitHub ecosystem, offering a unique value proposition.
Supporting Evidence
Zenhub offers a GraphQL API to build custom integrations and automate workflows. The Zenhub API allows you to create custom integrations, generate tailored reports, and automate project management workflows.
— support.zenhub.com
The tool allows for real-time data flow and task automation directly within GitHub's interface. The deep GitHub integration allows for the seamless flow of data and powers deep insights and task automation.
— github.com
Primarily integrates with GitHub, limiting its integration ecosystem outside of this platform.
— zenhub.com
9.4
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We check for industry-standard certifications, on-premise options for sensitive data, and encryption standards.
What We Found
Zenhub achieves high security standards with SOC 2 Type II certification and offers an on-premise version for enterprise data control.
Score Rationale
The availability of an on-premise solution combined with SOC 2 Type II certification places it in the top tier for enterprise security requirements.
Supporting Evidence
An on-premise version is available for GitHub Enterprise Server users. Zenhub Enterprise On-Premise is the only team collaboration solution built for GitHub Enterprise Server.
— github.com
Zenhub has achieved SOC 2 Type II certification with zero exceptions. Zenhub passed the SOC 2 Type II examination for the second year in a row with zero exceptions.
— zenhub.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Occasional UI glitches have been noted, such as sidebars not saving data if clicked away from or tabs failing to load.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
CoLab Software offers a cutting-edge platform for engineering teams to enhance collaboration with all relevant suppliers on designs. The software solves the increasing complexity in products, companies, and supply chains, by providing modern tools that evolve with these complexities.
CoLab Software offers a cutting-edge platform for engineering teams to enhance collaboration with all relevant suppliers on designs. The software solves the increasing complexity in products, companies, and supply chains, by providing modern tools that evolve with these complexities.
Best for teams that are
Mechanical engineering teams conducting collaborative 3D CAD design reviews
Organizations needing to share CAD models securely with suppliers without licenses
Hardware teams wanting to track design feedback directly on the model
Skip if
Pure software development teams with no hardware or CAD design needs
Teams seeking a general-purpose project management tool for non-technical tasks
Users looking for a tool to create or edit CAD geometry (it is for review only)
Expert Take
Our analysis shows CoLab transforms static design reviews into an active 'Design Engagement System' that significantly accelerates engineering workflows. Research indicates its browser-based approach solves the critical friction point of sharing complex CAD files with non-technical suppliers without compromising security. Based on documented features like AutoReview and deep PLM integrations, it offers a sophisticated layer of intelligence and control that simple viewers lack.
Pros
Browser-based 3D CAD viewing without installs
SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certified
Deep integration with Windchill and Teamcenter PLM
AI-powered AutoReview for automated design checks
Centralized issue tracking linked to model geometry
Cons
Pricing perceived as high for mid-sized teams
Occasional performance lag reported by users
Mobile functionality limited compared to desktop
Learning curve for advanced features
No public pricing transparency
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.7/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Collaboration Hubs for Product & Engineering Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.1
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the platform's ability to handle complex 3D CAD models, track design issues, and automate review workflows without requiring native CAD software.
What We Found
CoLab offers a robust "Design Engagement System" that renders 30+ CAD formats in-browser, links feedback directly to model geometry, and utilizes AI for automated design checks.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to its specialized ability to render complex 3D models in a browser and its innovative AutoReview AI feature, though it relies on external PLM for master data management.
Supporting Evidence
The platform functions as a collaborative issue tracker that ties feedback directly to reviews, files, and metadata. The backbone of CoLab is the first product-focused issue tracking system. It is a collaborative issue tracker that ties directly into reviews, files and metadata.
— colab-software.webflow.io
The AutoReview feature uses AI to automatically identify errors and non-conformances in drawings and 3D models. AutoReview is an AI Peer Checker trained on your design standards and guidelines... It annotates drawings and 3D models to identify errors and non-conformances
— colabsoftware.com
CoLab supports over 70 file types, including native and neutral CAD, allowing review without software installs. CoLab supports more than 70 file types, including native and neutral CAD and integrates with many PLM/PDM systems.
— colabsoftware.com
Documented in official product documentation, CoLab Software provides tools specifically designed for engineering teams to collaborate with suppliers on complex designs.
— colabsoftware.com
9.3
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for adoption by major enterprise engineering firms, documented success stories, and industry-standard certifications.
What We Found
The company is trusted by Fortune 500 leaders like Ford, Johnson Controls, and Komatsu, with documented case studies showing significant ROI and lead time reductions.
Score Rationale
The score reflects strong enterprise adoption and verified success stories with major industrial players, establishing high credibility in the engineering sector.
Supporting Evidence
Ford Pro reduced time-to-market by 30% on initial projects using CoLab. The first projects completed in CoLab got done 30% faster than before.
— youtube.com
Johnson Controls used CoLab to maintain cost reduction targets during the pandemic when travel was impossible. Using CoLab for VA/VE events has been a big savings.
— colabsoftware.com
CoLab is used by major industrial companies including Ford, Komatsu, and Johnson Controls. Today CoLab is trusted by Fortune 500 companies like Johnson Controls and Hyundai Mobis
— g2.com
8.8
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess how easily non-CAD experts and suppliers can access designs and provide feedback without complex installations.
What We Found
The browser-based interface significantly lowers barriers for suppliers and non-technical stakeholders, though some users report occasional performance lag.
Score Rationale
The score is strong because it eliminates the need for CAD licenses for reviewers, but is slightly impacted by reports of occasional loading slowness.
Supporting Evidence
Users report that the centralized platform improved drawing quality and issue capture rates. It 100% improved the drawing quality and issue capture rate — no disputing that.
— colabsoftware.com
The browser-based platform reduces IT overhead and deployment complexity for external stakeholders. Its browser-based platform reduces IT overhead and deployment complexity, making it particularly valuable for external stakeholders
— g2.com
8.2
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We look for transparent pricing models and evidence of return on investment for engineering teams.
What We Found
Pricing is not public and is described as 'expensive' for smaller teams, but enterprise ROI is well-documented with specific cost and time savings.
Score Rationale
This category scores lower due to the lack of public pricing and feedback indicating it may be cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations, despite high enterprise ROI.
Supporting Evidence
Customers have achieved significant financial results, including 8-figure cost reductions. Customers using CoLab for complex review have accelerated design cycles 2x, achieved 8-figure cost reduction targets
— trust.colabsoftware.com
An engineering team of 30-50 evaluated the software and found it to be too expensive. We evaluated it (30-50 engineers in our org) and found it to be too expensive.
— reddit.com
9.0
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We check for seamless connectivity with major PLM systems, CAD tools, and project management software like Jira.
What We Found
The platform integrates deeply with major PLM systems (Windchill, Teamcenter, SolidWorks PDM) and synchronizes issues with Jira.
Score Rationale
The score reflects comprehensive support for the major PLM and CAD ecosystems used by enterprise engineering teams, ensuring it fits into existing workflows.
Supporting Evidence
The Jira integration allows design comments to be transformed into actionable Jira issues. CoLab's Jira integration helps you turn design feedback into actionable Jira issues
— colabsoftware.com
CoLab integrates directly with major PLM systems including Windchill, Solidworks PDM, and Teamcenter. CoLab integrates directly with Windchill PLM, Solidworks PDM, Teamcenter PLM, and 3DEXPERIENCE.
— colabsoftware.com
9.4
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We evaluate adherence to strict engineering security standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ITAR/CGP readiness.
What We Found
CoLab maintains top-tier security certifications including SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, and is registered in Canada's Controlled Goods Program.
Score Rationale
The score is exceptional because the company meets rigorous standards required for defense and aerospace, including specific government registrations.
Supporting Evidence
The company is registered in the Government of Canada's Controlled Goods Program (CGP). CoLab is also registered in the Government of Canada's Controlled Goods Program (CGP) and we're actively working towards CMMC/ITAR readiness
— colabsoftware.com
CoLab has completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit with zero findings. CoLab has now successfully completed a SOC 2 type 2 audit, achieving a clean audit report with zero findings.
— colabsoftware.com
Outlined in published security policies, CoLab Software ensures data protection and compliance with industry standards.
— colabsoftware.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The mobile application reportedly lacks some features available on the desktop version, limiting on-the-go functionality.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
HubStar is a top-tier software designed to streamline the collaborative efforts of product & engineering teams. It places a strong emphasis on allowing teams to connect effortlessly, enhancing learning, fostering creativity, and boosting productivity. HubStar effectively addresses industry needs by providing a hybrid workplace environment that balances remote and on-site work seamlessly.
HubStar is a top-tier software designed to streamline the collaborative efforts of product & engineering teams. It places a strong emphasis on allowing teams to connect effortlessly, enhancing learning, fostering creativity, and boosting productivity. HubStar effectively addresses industry needs by providing a hybrid workplace environment that balances remote and on-site work seamlessly.
Best for teams that are
Facilities managers optimizing physical office space and desk utilization
Companies implementing hybrid work policies requiring desk and room booking
HR leaders wanting data on office attendance and occupancy trends
Skip if
Fully remote organizations with no physical office footprint to manage
Teams looking for digital software project management or code collaboration
Small offices with fixed seating that do not need dynamic booking systems
Expert Take
Our analysis shows HubStar distinguishes itself by moving beyond simple desk booking to offer a true 'Positioning Intelligence Engine.' Research indicates its H2O platform uniquely combines scheduling data with actual hardware-agnostic occupancy data (via Wi-Fi or sensors), allowing for precise portfolio right-sizing. Based on documented integrations, its early adoption of Microsoft's NAA security protocol and deep connection with Microsoft Places make it a robust choice for enterprise-grade hybrid strategies.
Pros
Deep Microsoft Places & Teams integration
Hardware-agnostic Wi-Fi utilization analytics
Advanced portfolio optimization features
ISO and WCAG 2.1AA compliant
Acquired Relogix for sensor depth
Cons
Mobile app stability issues reported
Complex initial setup process
No transparent public pricing
Overwhelming features for small teams
Support sometimes described as lacking
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.6/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Collaboration Hubs for Product & Engineering Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.9
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of hybrid work features, including desk booking, utilization analytics, and portfolio management capabilities.
What We Found
HubStar offers the H2O platform, combining 'Connect' for scheduling with 'PresenceIQ' for utilization data, supporting complex hybrid strategies and portfolio optimization.
Score Rationale
The product scores highly due to its comprehensive integration of scheduling and actual occupancy data (via Wi-Fi/sensors), though mobile app limitations prevent a perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
The platform includes advanced features like AI digital assistants and dynamic occupancy management. AI digital assistant. Reduce friction associated with coming to the office.
— hubstar.com
PresenceIQ aggregates data from badges, sensors, and Wi-Fi to provide real-time space utilization insights without requiring new hardware. Aggregate multiple data sources. Unify utilization data (badge, WiFi, sensor) into a single view.
— hubstar.com
The H2O platform unifies scheduling, sensor data, and Wi-Fi analytics to optimize hybrid occupancy and reduce portfolio costs. The most powerful and interoperable workplace management platform available today, built for hybrid.
— hubstar.com
Documented in official product documentation, HubStar offers features tailored for hybrid workplaces, enhancing both remote and on-site collaboration.
— hubstar.com
9.0
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for enterprise adoption, strategic acquisitions, and recognition from major technology partners.
What We Found
HubStar serves major global clients like ABN AMRO and Radboud University, has acquired sensor company Relogix, and is a recognized Microsoft partner.
Score Rationale
Strong market presence is evidenced by the acquisition of Relogix and partnerships with Microsoft, validating its position in the enterprise space.
Supporting Evidence
HubStar is listed on the UK Government G-Cloud framework, indicating public sector trust. HubStar Connect (formerly Smartway2) provides next-generation scheduling... Framework G-Cloud 14.
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
Major organizations like ABN AMRO use HubStar to optimize office floor usage. How ABN AMRO Optimized Office Floor Usage with HubStar.
— hubstar.com
HubStar acquired Relogix to enhance its occupancy sensor and analytics capabilities. HubStar has acquired Relogix, a leading provider of workplace occupancy sensors and analytics solutions.
— hubstar.com
8.2
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess user interface design, ease of setup, and mobile application performance based on user feedback.
What We Found
While the web interface is praised for being clean, the mobile app suffers from significant negative reviews regarding login issues and crashes.
Score Rationale
The score is impacted by documented mobile app instability and reports of complex initial setup, despite positive feedback on the web interface.
Supporting Evidence
Some users find the initial setup process complex and overwhelming. some users found the initial setup process to be a bit like navigating an asteroid field - a tad complex.
— selecthub.com
Mobile app users report significant usability issues, including login loops and crashes. This app is clumsy and difficult to use at the best of times. Currently I am unable to log in for no reason whatsoever.
— apps.apple.com
Users praise the web interface for being clean and simple to use. The standout features are it's clean and simple interface, ability to integrate with Outlook
— hubstar.com
8.1
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We look for clear public pricing, flexible licensing models, and transparent contract terms.
What We Found
Pricing is primarily quote-based for enterprise, though some sources indicate a starting price around $300/year or £5/unit/year.
Score Rationale
Transparency is lower due to the 'contact for quote' model common in enterprise software, though some third-party listings provide baseline figures.
Supporting Evidence
G-Cloud listing indicates a price range of £5 to £350 a unit a year. £5 to £350 a unit a year. Education pricing available
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
Public pricing is not listed on the main site; users must contact sales for a quote. Got questions or need a quote? Get in touch with our sales team.
— hubstar.com
9.3
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We evaluate the depth of integrations with calendar systems, hardware sensors, and collaboration tools.
What We Found
HubStar excels with deep Microsoft ecosystem integration (Teams, Outlook, Places) and vendor-agnostic sensor support (Cisco, Extreme, Relogix).
Score Rationale
The platform's ability to integrate with Microsoft Places and existing Wi-Fi infrastructure for analytics without new hardware justifies a high score.
Supporting Evidence
Seamless integration with Microsoft Teams allows booking without leaving the app. Make bookings, view and manage your Connect reservations without leaving the Teams app.
— hubstar.com
The platform supports integrations with Cisco and Extreme Networks for Wi-Fi based analytics. Integrate Presence IQ with Cisco infrastructure for enhanced space utilization analytics.
— hubstar.com
HubStar integrates directly with Microsoft Places for spatial data management. The HubStar integration with Microsoft Places delivers a powerful, automated, and highly scalable solution for managing workplace spatial data
— marketplace.microsoft.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, HubStar supports integrations with major tools like Slack and Jira.
— hubstar.com
9.1
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We check for industry-standard certifications like SOC 2, ISO, and adherence to modern security protocols.
What We Found
HubStar is ISO and WCAG compliant and is an early adopter of Microsoft's Nested App Authentication (NAA) security protocol.
Score Rationale
Proactive adoption of new Microsoft security standards and documented ISO compliance demonstrates a strong commitment to enterprise-grade security.
Supporting Evidence
HubStar supports Single Sign-On (SSO) via Entra ID and Okta. Authentication / user provisioning. Azure Active Directory... Okta SSO.
— hubstar.com
The platform is documented as ISO and WCAG 2.1AA accessibility compliant. ISO and WCAG 2.1AA accessibility compliant.
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
HubStar is a Microsoft partner for the new Nested App Authentication (NAA) security protocol. HubStar has been named a Microsoft partner in implementing the new Nested App Authentication (NAA) security protocol
— hubstar.com
Outlined in published security documentation, HubStar complies with major data protection regulations.
— hubstar.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Pricing is not transparently listed on the primary website, requiring potential customers to go through a sales quote process.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Mattermost is a collaboration hub specifically designed for Product & Engineering Teams. It is designed to improve team focus, reduce app sprawl, and keep sensitive data safe. It's an open-source platform that provides a unified workspace for technical teams to collaborate more efficiently and securely.
Mattermost is a collaboration hub specifically designed for Product & Engineering Teams. It is designed to improve team focus, reduce app sprawl, and keep sensitive data safe. It's an open-source platform that provides a unified workspace for technical teams to collaborate more efficiently and securely.
CLOUD PIONEER
OPEN-SOURCE CHAMPION
Best for teams that are
Technical and DevOps teams requiring strict data sovereignty and security
Enterprises in regulated industries like defense or finance needing self-hosting
Organizations needing an air-gapped communication platform
Skip if
Non-technical teams wanting a plug-and-play chat app with no IT maintenance
Small organizations that do not require private cloud infrastructure
Teams heavily reliant on the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for all workflows
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Mattermost is the premier choice for high-security environments, offering a unique combination of 'sovereign collaboration' and deep developer extensibility. Research indicates it is trusted by defense agencies like the USAF because it supports fully air-gapped deployments where no data leaves the perimeter. Based on documented features, its open-core architecture allows technical teams to build bespoke workflows that closed SaaS platforms cannot match.
Pros
Fully air-gapped & self-hosted options
Trusted by USAF & NASA
Deep workflow automation (Playbooks)
Open-source core for customization
Cheaper TCO than Microsoft Teams
Cons
Mobile app lacks full parity
UI feels dated/utilitarian
No native video conferencing
Free tier removed GitLab SSO
Steeper setup for non-techs
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.4/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Collaboration Hubs for Product & Engineering Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.8
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We look for comprehensive collaboration features like messaging, file sharing, and workflow automation tailored for technical teams.
What We Found
Mattermost offers threaded messaging, file sharing, and audio calling, plus specialized 'Playbooks' for incident response and workflow automation. It supports 'Intelligent Mission Environments' with multi-agent AI capabilities, though it relies on integrations for video conferencing rather than having a native built-in solution like Teams.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to robust workflow automation (Playbooks) and technical features, but slightly capped because video conferencing requires third-party integrations.
Supporting Evidence
Relies on third-party integrations like Zoom or Jitsi for video calls rather than a native built-in video bridge. Mattermost relies on third-party integrations like Zoom and Jitsi for video calls.
— slackalternative.com
Includes Playbooks for workflow automation and incident response, integrated directly into the platform. Mattermost Playbooks standardizes and automates mission workflows such as incident response, shift changeovers, and operational checklists
— mattermost.com
Offers robust collaboration tools including threaded messaging, file sharing, and unlimited search history. Teams and channels for one-to-one and group messaging, file sharing, and unlimited search history with threaded messaging
— docs.mattermost.com
Open-source nature allows for extensive customization and flexibility, as outlined in product documentation.
— docs.mattermost.com
Documented support for numerous integrations, including Jira and GitHub, enhancing team workflows.
— mattermost.com
9.3
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for adoption by high-security organizations, open-source community activity, and verifiable customer success stories.
What We Found
The platform is trusted by highly sensitive organizations including the U.S. Air Force, NASA, and Samsung. It powers over 800,000 workspaces and is backed by a vibrant open-source community with over 4,000 contributors, signaling immense market trust in its security and reliability.
Score Rationale
The score is exceptional because adoption by defense and aerospace sectors (USAF, NASA) serves as the ultimate validation for a security-focused product.
Supporting Evidence
Supported by a massive open-source community with thousands of contributors. Mattermost's open source platform powers over 800,000 workspaces worldwide with the support of over 4,000 contributors
— g2.com
Used by the U.S. Department of Defense for mission-critical collaboration. Rolled out Mattermost on Platform One to 48,000 DoD employees in one week
— mattermost.com
Trusted by high-profile customers including the U.S. Air Force, NASA, Samsung, and Nasdaq. The company serves over 800 customers, including European Parliament, NASA, Nasdaq, Samsung, SAP, United States Air Force and Wealthfront
— g2.com
8.2
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We look for intuitive interfaces, reliable mobile apps, and seamless user experiences across devices.
What We Found
While functional, users describe the interface as 'utilitarian' or 'dated' compared to competitors. Significant friction exists around code formatting (triple backticks required) and mobile app limitations, where features like Playbooks were historically missing or limited, though updates are in progress.
Score Rationale
The score is lower than other categories due to documented user complaints about the 'dated' UI and specific mobile app functionality gaps.
Supporting Evidence
Mobile app has faced criticism for lacking full parity with desktop features like Playbooks. When i tried to use it through mattermost android app , i couldnt load or even make me show playbook or focalboard.
— reddit.com
Users report frustration with code formatting, specifically the lack of easy block quoting. Having to wrap everything in triple backticks kills momentum... It's death by a thousand cuts.
— g2.com
Users find the interface 'utilitarian' and less polished than modern alternatives. The interface can feel a bit dated compared to newer messaging apps... the interface feels very utilitarian
— g2.com
Requires technical knowledge for setup, which may impact initial user experience.
— mattermost.com
8.6
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We look for clear pricing tiers, free options for evaluation, and competitive total cost of ownership.
What We Found
Mattermost offers a 'Professional' tier at $10/user/month and a free 'Entry' tier. While generally cost-effective compared to Microsoft Teams, recent changes to the free tier (removing GitLab SSO and adding message limits) have caused some community friction, though it remains a strong value for self-hosted needs.
Score Rationale
The score is strong due to the existence of a robust free tier and lower TCO than competitors, but slightly penalized for the removal of previously free SSO features.
Supporting Evidence
Recent changes to the free tier removed GitLab SSO, pushing some users to paid plans. GitLab SSO removed... Mattermost Entry becomes the go-to free option... with usage rate limits.
— forum.mattermost.com
Claims significant cost savings compared to Microsoft Teams Enterprise plans. Mattermost customers enjoy huge savings of up to 40% and more versus Microsoft Teams users.
— mattermost.com
Professional plan pricing is transparent at $10 per user/month. Professional $10.00 per month / per user
— trustradius.com
Offers a free open-source version with enterprise pricing available for advanced features.
— mattermost.com
9.6
Category 5: Security, Compliance & Data Sovereignty
What We Looked For
We look for air-gapped deployment options, compliance certifications (SOC2, HIPAA), and data control features.
What We Found
This is Mattermost's standout category. It supports fully air-gapped, self-hosted deployments ensuring zero data leakage. It meets strict compliance standards (SOC 2, GDPR) and offers 'sovereign' AI capabilities, making it suitable for defense and critical infrastructure where SaaS solutions fail.
Score Rationale
The score is near-perfect because it offers air-gapped and self-hosted capabilities that most SaaS competitors simply cannot match.
Supporting Evidence
Licensed customers can access SOC 2 reports and penetration testing summaries. If you are a licensed customer, you can request access to additional documentation, such as: SOC 2 Report.
— support.mattermost.com
Provides sovereign AI capabilities where data does not leave the perimeter. No data leaves the organization's perimeter, and no third-party risks exist.
— prweb.com
Supports air-gapped environments for maximum security. Our platform runs on-premises, in private clouds, and in air-gapped environments
— mattermost.com
SOC 2 compliance ensures high standards of security and data protection.
— mattermost.com
9.1
Category 6: Integrations & Developer Ecosystem
What We Looked For
We look for API availability, SDKs, plugin architectures, and support for developer tools.
What We Found
Mattermost provides an 'open core' platform with a comprehensive REST API, webhooks, and a plugin architecture written in Go. It integrates deeply with developer tools like Jira, GitHub, and GitLab, allowing technical teams to customize the platform extensively to their workflows.
Score Rationale
The score is excellent due to the open-source nature allowing deeper customization than closed SaaS tools, supported by a rich API and plugin system.
Supporting Evidence
Allows developers to write plugins in Go to extend server functionality. Plugins are the most comprehensive way to add new features... and must be written in Go.
— developers.mattermost.com
Pre-packaged integrations exist for major developer tools like Jira and GitHub. Pre-packaged integrations with most common developer tools, including Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Zoom, and more.
— docs.mattermost.com
Offers a comprehensive REST API and plugin architecture for deep customization. Interact with users, channels, and everything else that happens on your Mattermost server via a modern REST API
— developers.mattermost.com
Listed integrations with popular developer tools like Jenkins and GitLab enhance ecosystem strength.
— mattermost.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The removal of GitLab SSO from the free Team Edition and the introduction of message limits in the new Entry tier have generated negative feedback from the open-source community.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Technical users frequently complain about the code formatting experience, citing the need for manual triple backticks and the lack of intuitive block quoting as a productivity hindrance.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Users report the mobile app lacks full feature parity with the desktop version, specifically regarding Playbooks and Boards functionality in older versions, though updates are rolling out.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Miro is a collaborative workspace specifically designed for product and engineering teams. It facilitates the ideation, project management, and design process by offering a shared, visual platform where teams can work together in real-time. The software's ability to integrate with other productivity tools and its extensive template library make it perfectly suited for this industry.
Miro is a collaborative workspace specifically designed for product and engineering teams. It facilitates the ideation, project management, and design process by offering a shared, visual platform where teams can work together in real-time. The software's ability to integrate with other productivity tools and its extensive template library make it perfectly suited for this industry.
INTEGRATION MASTER
TEMPLATE GURU
Best for teams that are
Cross-functional teams needing a visual canvas for brainstorming and agile planning
Product teams bridging the gap between unstructured ideation and structured delivery
Organizations wanting to centralize diagrams, wireframes, and roadmaps in one space
Skip if
Teams needing strict, granular task tracking and reporting (e.g., replacing Jira)
Users who find infinite canvases overwhelming and prefer linear text documents
Groups requiring complex resource loading or Gantt chart dependencies
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Miro Innovation Workspace effectively bridges the gap between unstructured brainstorming and structured project execution. Research indicates it is a market leader in security, being one of the first to achieve ISO 42001 certification for AI safety. Based on documented features, its ability to integrate Docs, Tables, and AI prototyping directly into an infinite canvas makes it a uniquely comprehensive solution for enterprise innovation.
Pros
Infinite canvas for visual collaboration
ISO 42001 AI security certification
Integrates with 150+ enterprise apps
Bridges ideation with structured docs
Used by 99% of Fortune 100
Cons
Lag on large, complex boards
No offline editing mode
Free plan limited to 3 boards
Steep learning curve for some
Mobile app has limited functionality
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.4/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Collaboration Hubs for Product & Engineering Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.4
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the platform's ability to support the entire innovation lifecycle from unstructured ideation to structured execution.
What We Found
Miro Innovation Workspace integrates AI-powered prototyping, intelligent templates, and structured data formats like Docs and Tables directly into an infinite canvas.
Score Rationale
The score of 9.4 reflects the platform's successful evolution from a whiteboard to a comprehensive end-to-end innovation solution, though it lacks full offline capabilities.
Supporting Evidence
The platform utilizes a 'canvas-first' approach that supports video, audio, and text files to facilitate the entire innovation process. Canvas is form and file agnostic, meaning workers can move from brainstorm to documentation to task tracking to prototype building all in one space.
— reworked.co
The Innovation Workspace introduces over 30 new features including AI-powered Prototyping, Docs, and Tables to bridge ideation and execution. It includes over 30 new features, such as AI-powered Prototyping, Docs, Tables, and integrations with popular apps like Adobe Express and Microsoft Copilot.
— collab-collective.com
Integration with tools like Slack, Jira, and Microsoft Teams is listed in the company's integration directory.
— miro.com
Documented in official product documentation, Miro offers a wide range of templates and tools for ideation and project management.
— miro.com
9.8
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess market adoption, user base size, and trust among enterprise-level organizations.
What We Found
Miro is a dominant market leader used by 99% of the Fortune 100 and over 100 million users globally.
Score Rationale
A near-perfect score is justified by its massive adoption rate of 100 million users and validation from top-tier enterprise clients like Nike and Cisco.
Supporting Evidence
The platform has achieved significant enterprise penetration, being used by 99% of Fortune 100 companies. Miro's enterprise penetration is significant, with the company stating that 99% of the Fortune 100 are among its users.
— updf.com
Miro serves more than 100 million users across 250,000 organizations worldwide. Today, more than 100 million users in 250,000 organizations including Nike, IKEA, Deloitte, WPP, and Cisco depend on Miro
— miro.com
Recognized by Forrester as a leader in the collaborative work management space.
— go.forrester.com
8.9
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We look for ease of use, interface intuitiveness, and performance stability across different devices.
What We Found
Users praise the intuitive infinite canvas and collaboration features, though performance issues on large, content-heavy boards are a documented pain point.
Score Rationale
While the UX is highly rated for collaboration, the score is held back from the 9.0+ range by persistent reports of lag on complex boards.
Supporting Evidence
Reviewers highlight the intuitive interface that allows for easy diagramming and real-time collaboration. Miro is an exceptional platform that has perfected the way I manage projects in the office. Its intuitive and easy-to-use interface allows team members to collaborate in real time.
— miro.com
Users consistently report that boards with heavy content can lag, impacting performance and user experience. Boards with heavy content can occasionally lag, impacting performance.
— g2.com
8.6
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate the flexibility of pricing plans, the utility of the free tier, and the transparency of costs.
What We Found
Miro offers a robust free plan and clear tiered pricing, but the strict 3-board limit on the free tier can be restrictive for active users.
Score Rationale
The score is strong due to transparent pricing and a functional free tier, but slightly reduced because the 3-board limit locks older boards, which can frustrate users.
Supporting Evidence
The free plan is limited to 3 editable boards; creating a fourth board locks the oldest one to view-only. Please note, that only 3 most recently created boards in your team are available for editing and collaboration with your team.
— help.miro.com
The Starter plan is priced at $8 per user/month and the Business plan at $16 per user/month when billed annually. Starter Tier - $8/month per member billed annually... Business - $16/month per member billed annually.
— spendflo.com
Pricing starts at $8/month with a free plan available, as documented on the official pricing page.
— miro.com
9.2
Category 5: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We analyze the breadth of third-party integrations and the quality of the developer platform.
What We Found
The platform integrates with over 150 applications including major enterprise tools like Microsoft Copilot, Adobe Express, and Jira.
Score Rationale
A score of 9.2 is awarded for its extensive library of 150+ integrations that fit seamlessly into existing enterprise tech stacks.
Supporting Evidence
New integrations allow users to access Adobe design tools directly within the Miro environment. Miro announced the integration of Adobe Express into its platform... allow users to access various Adobe design tools without leaving the Miro environment.
— forbes.com
Miro supports over 150 integrations with popular workplace applications. Miro supports over 150 integrations with applications like Microsoft 365, Adobe Express, and Google Workspace
— ecommercenews.asia
The Enterprise Guard add-on provides automated sensitive data classification and intelligent guardrails. The Enterprise Guard add-on provides advanced features like automated sensitive data classification and Intelligent Guardrails for team workspaces.
— miro.com
Miro has achieved ISO 42001 certification, a new international standard for AI management systems. Miro... today announced it has achieved ISO 42001 certification, the world's first AI management system standard.
— miro.com
Listed integrations with over 100 tools, including Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, enhance ecosystem strength.
— miro.com
9.0
Category 6: Scalability & Performance
Insufficient evidence to formulate a 'What We Looked For', 'What We Found', and 'Score Rationale' for this category; this category will be weighted less.
Supporting Evidence
Scalability is supported by enterprise-grade features and performance optimizations for large teams.
— miro.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The free plan's strict 3-board limit causes confusion and workflow disruption by locking older boards into view-only mode.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Notion's Product Development Hub is a centralized workspace specifically designed for product & engineering teams. It integrates tasks, documents, and communications in one place, making collaboration and workflow seamless. The hub addresses the industry's need for streamlined work processes, information accessibility, and team collaboration.
Notion's Product Development Hub is a centralized workspace specifically designed for product & engineering teams. It integrates tasks, documents, and communications in one place, making collaboration and workflow seamless. The hub addresses the industry's need for streamlined work processes, information accessibility, and team collaboration.
STREAMLINED WORKFLOW
PROCESS SYNCHRONIZER
Best for teams that are
Product teams wanting to unify docs, wikis, and roadmaps in one flexible tool
Startups valuing high customizability to build their own bespoke workflows
Teams who want to link user research directly to product specs and tasks
Skip if
Large enterprises requiring rigid, complex reporting or strict access controls
Teams who prefer ready-made, structured workflows over building their own system
Groups needing advanced data visualization or complex automation out of the box
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Notion excels at bridging the gap between product strategy and execution by keeping requirements and roadmaps in the same flexible workspace. Research indicates it is a superior choice for teams that value documentation-driven development over rigid agile enforcement. While it lacks the deep native reporting of Jira, its ability to link every task directly to its spec makes it uniquely powerful for product clarity.
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.3/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Collaboration Hubs for Product & Engineering Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.7
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the platform's ability to manage the entire product lifecycle, from roadmapping and documentation to task tracking and sprint management.
What We Found
Notion excels as a flexible, centralized hub that combines documents, wikis, and project management in one space, though it lacks deep, native agile reporting features found in dedicated tools.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to its unparalleled flexibility and document-database integration, but capped below 9.0 because it requires significant customization to replicate advanced agile workflows like burndown charts.
Supporting Evidence
Users report that while Notion works for sprints, dedicated tools like Jira offer superior native agile features like rolling sprints and points. I have tried using Notion for development sprints and while it worked, Jira just makes it so much easier - rolling sprints, counting points, coloring cards, labels, wip limits, etc.
— reddit.com
The platform supports multiple database views including Board, Timeline, and Calendar to visualize projects and tasks. First you establish your underlying data, then you can view that data in many different ways: tables, kanban boards, timelines, calendars and more.
— thoughtbot.com
Notion functions as a centralized hub for docs, tasks, and communications, allowing teams to create a single, customizable product roadmap. Notion brings together your team's docs, tasks, and communications in one collaborative space.
— notion.com
Customizable templates allow teams to adapt workflows to specific project needs, as outlined in platform documentation.
— notion.com
Documented in official product documentation, Notion's hub integrates tasks, documents, and communications in one place, enhancing collaboration.
— notion.com
9.2
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for industry adoption, security certifications, and user sentiment to gauge the product's reliability and reputation in the SaaS market.
What We Found
Notion is a market leader used by major tech companies, backed by robust security certifications like SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, and consistently ranks high on review platforms.
Score Rationale
A score of 9.2 reflects its status as a standard-setter in the productivity space, trusted by enterprise clients like OpenAI and Figma, with verified security compliance.
Supporting Evidence
Notion consistently ranks as a leader on G2 based on hundreds of customer reviews. Notion consistently ranks as the G2 industry leader based on hundreds of customer reviews.
— notion.com
The platform holds multiple ISO certifications, including ISO 27001, demonstrating a commitment to international security standards. Notion has achieved certifications for four ISO standards: ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, and ISO 27018.
— notion.com
Notion is trusted by industry leaders such as OpenAI, Figma, and Volvo. Trusted by teams at OpenAI, Figma, Volvo, Ramp, Cursor.
— notion.com
8.9
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess the interface design, ease of use, mobile experience, and learning curve for new users setting up product workflows.
What We Found
The desktop experience is highly praised for its clean, intuitive UI, but the mobile app suffers from significant performance issues and lag, which impacts the overall experience.
Score Rationale
While the desktop UI is class-leading (meriting a 9.5+), the persistent and well-documented mobile app performance issues drag the overall usability score down to 8.9.
Supporting Evidence
Users report that the mobile app feels like a 'shrunken desktop app' rather than a mobile-first tool, causing friction. It feels like a shrunken desktop app rather than a mobile-first tool.
— reddit.com
The mobile app is frequently criticized for being slow, laggy, and having poor text selection mechanics. But writing in Notion for iOS is HORRIBLE. Each time I tap a word it selects the entire word by default.
— reddit.com
Users praise the clean, minimal, and intuitive user interface on desktop. The user interface is clean, minimal, and intuitive.
— g2.com
Praised for its user-friendly interface and real-time collaboration capabilities, facilitating seamless teamwork.
— pcmag.com
8.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We analyze the pricing structure, feature inclusion at different tiers, and hidden costs associated with essential product management features.
What We Found
Notion offers a competitive tiered model with a robust free plan, but advanced AI features are now bundled into higher tiers or sold as add-ons, increasing the effective cost for full functionality.
Score Rationale
The score is 8.5 because while the base value is excellent, the shift to bundle AI in the Business plan ($20/user) or as an add-on creates a higher barrier for teams wanting those specific features.
Supporting Evidence
The Free plan has limitations like a 5MB file upload limit and restricted version history. On the Free plan, you can upload images, videos and file attachments up to 5MB each.
— notion.com
AI features are now included in the Business plan, which changes the cost calculation for teams who previously bought it as a separate add-on. AI is now built into the Business and Enterprise plans... The Business plan at $20/month suddenly looks different when you realize it includes full AI access.
— userjot.com
Notion offers a Free plan, a Plus plan at $10/user/mo, and a Business plan at $20/user/mo (billed annually). Plus $10 per member / month... Business $20 per member / month.
— notion.com
Offers a free plan with paid options starting at $8/month, providing flexible pricing documented on the official site.
— notion.com
8.8
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We evaluate the quality and depth of integrations with engineering tools like Jira and GitHub, which are critical for a product development hub.
What We Found
Notion offers 'Synced Databases' for Jira and GitHub, but they often have limitations such as being read-only or requiring specific permissions, preventing full two-way control from within Notion.
Score Rationale
A score of 8.8 acknowledges the vast ecosystem and API, but reflects the limitation that native synced databases for external tools are often read-only, hindering a true 'command center' experience.
Supporting Evidence
Notion's Jira Sync allows 2-way sync but requires edit access to the Jira database and individual user authentication. Only users with edit access to the synced Jira database can enable and use two-way sync.
— notion.com
Unito notes that native synced databases are read-only, meaning you can't edit GitHub work items directly from Notion. They're read-only: If you want to make changes to your GitHub work items from Notion, you might be disappointed.
— unito.io
Synced Databases allow pulling data from Jira and GitHub, but edits often must happen in the original tool. But you cannot edit the data in synced properties from Notion. Instead, all edits happen in the original tool and are synced back to the Notion synced database.
— simonesmerilli.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, Notion supports integrations with tools like Slack and Google Drive.
— notion.so
9.0
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We examine the product's adherence to security standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR, as well as features like SSO and data residency.
What We Found
Notion has achieved top-tier security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) and offers enterprise-grade features like SAML SSO, though HIPAA compliance is gated behind the Enterprise plan.
Score Rationale
The score of 9.0 is awarded for its comprehensive certification portfolio, with the slight deduction because advanced security features like HIPAA compliance and SSO are restricted to the most expensive tiers.
Supporting Evidence
SAML Single Sign-On (SSO) is a feature reserved for Business and Enterprise plans. Manage employee access at scale with secure single sign-on. SAML SSO.
— notion.com
HIPAA compliance is available but requires the Enterprise plan and a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA). Notion's standard version is not HIPAA-compliant... customers must be on the Enterprise plan to avail of this feature.
— planetcompliance.com
Notion is certified for SOC 2 Type 2 and multiple ISO standards including ISO 27001. Notion has achieved certifications for four ISO standards: ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, and ISO 27018.
— notion.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Notion lacks native, out-of-the-box agile reporting features (like burndown charts, velocity tracking, and cumulative flow diagrams) that are standard in dedicated tools like Jira.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Native 'Synced Databases' for tools like GitHub are often read-only, meaning users cannot edit external tickets directly within Notion, limiting its utility as a fully functional two-way hub.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
The mobile application suffers from significant performance issues, including slow load times, laggy text input, and poor responsiveness, which frustrates users needing on-the-go access.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
In evaluating collaboration hubs for product and engineering teams, key factors included features, specifications, customer reviews, ratings, and overall value. Specific considerations important to this category encompassed integration capabilities with existing tools, user interface design, and scalability to support team growth and collaboration. The research methodology focused on a comprehensive analysis of product specifications, consumer feedback, and market ratings, allowing for a balanced comparison that highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each product. Rankings were determined by synthesizing data from various sources to ensure an objective assessment of each collaboration hub's effectiveness and suitability for team collaboration needs.
Overall scores reflect relative ranking within this category, accounting for which limitations materially affect real-world use cases. Small differences in category scores can result in larger ranking separation when those differences affect the most common or highest-impact workflows.
Verification
Products evaluated through comprehensive research and analysis of collaboration features and team integration capabilities.
Rankings based on analysis of user reviews, expert ratings, and industry benchmarks for product and engineering collaboration tools.
Selection criteria focus on user experience, scalability, and integration with existing workflows in collaborative environments.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We may also earn commissions from other affiliate partners.
×
Score Breakdown
0.0/ 10
Deep Research
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. By continuing to use our website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Learn more
