Uncovering the Best Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams: Research-Backed Insights When it comes to selecting the right internal wiki tool for your small team, market research shows that not all platforms are created equal. Analysis of thousands of customer reviews indicates that tools like Notion and Confluence often stand out for their user-friendly interfaces and robust features. However, while Confluence tends to score well in customer satisfaction ratings, some users have pointed out that its pricing can be steep for smaller teams—leading many to wonder, "Why does everyone think you need to spend $$$ on these tools?" On the other hand, platforms like Slite offer a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing performance, making them frequently mentioned in third-party comparisons for cost-effectiveness. Data suggests that organizations favor tools that integrate seamlessly with existing workflows, and in this regard, ClickUp has gained traction for its versatility across various project management needs. Users often report high satisfaction with ClickUp's collaborative features, which may help streamline communication within teams. Interestingly, industry reports show that nearly 60% of users prefer tools that support real-time editing and version control, underscoring the importance of collaboration in today's remote work landscape.Uncovering the Best Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams: Research-Backed Insights When it comes to selecting the right internal wiki tool for your small team, market research shows that not all platforms are created equal. Analysis of thousands of customer reviews indicates that tools like Notion and Confluence often stand out for their user-friendly interfaces and robust features.Uncovering the Best Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams: Research-Backed Insights When it comes to selecting the right internal wiki tool for your small team, market research shows that not all platforms are created equal. Analysis of thousands of customer reviews indicates that tools like Notion and Confluence often stand out for their user-friendly interfaces and robust features. However, while Confluence tends to score well in customer satisfaction ratings, some users have pointed out that its pricing can be steep for smaller teams—leading many to wonder, "Why does everyone think you need to spend $$$ on these tools?" On the other hand, platforms like Slite offer a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing performance, making them frequently mentioned in third-party comparisons for cost-effectiveness. Data suggests that organizations favor tools that integrate seamlessly with existing workflows, and in this regard, ClickUp has gained traction for its versatility across various project management needs. Users often report high satisfaction with ClickUp's collaborative features, which may help streamline communication within teams. Interestingly, industry reports show that nearly 60% of users prefer tools that support real-time editing and version control, underscoring the importance of collaboration in today's remote work landscape. For teams operating in different climates—both metaphorically and literally—it's crucial to consider scalability. A tool like Tettra, which is designed for smaller teams and offers easy onboarding, may be ideal if you're looking for something that grows with you. Remember, the best tool isn’t necessarily the most expensive one; it’s the one that meets your specific needs without breaking the bank. So as you dive into your search, keep an eye on what others are saying—after all, a little research can save you from making a costly mistake!
Outline is a modern, intuitive SaaS solution that's perfect for small teams seeking an efficient internal wiki tool. It aids in the organization and access of internal documents, product specs, meeting notes, and more, streamlining collaboration and productivity within the team.
Outline is a modern, intuitive SaaS solution that's perfect for small teams seeking an efficient internal wiki tool. It aids in the organization and access of internal documents, product specs, meeting notes, and more, streamlining collaboration and productivity within the team.
EASY INTEGRATION
FREE PLAN AVAILABLE
Best for teams that are
Developers and technical teams who prefer Markdown and a clean UI
Organizations wanting a self-hostable, fast, and secure knowledge base
Teams looking for a read-optimized, clutter-free documentation tool
Skip if
Teams needing complex databases or project management features
Non-technical users who struggle with Markdown formatting
Users who rely heavily on pre-built templates for various document types
Expert Take
Our analysis shows that Outline distinguishes itself through an obsessive focus on speed and reading experience, rather than trying to be an all-in-one operating system. Research indicates it is a top choice for technical teams who value Markdown support and open-source transparency. While it lacks the database features of Notion, its flat-rate pricing and self-hosting capabilities make it a uniquely high-value proposition for security-conscious organizations.
Pros
Blazing fast performance and load times
Distraction-free, intuitive user interface
Flat-rate pricing for small teams
Self-hosted option for full data control
Deep Slack search and notification integration
Cons
No native mobile app (iOS/Android)
No database or spreadsheet features
Self-hosting requires DevOps expertise
Limited visual customization options
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.9/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.8
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the richness of documentation features, collaboration tools, and content organization capabilities specific to team knowledge bases.
What We Found
Outline excels as a specialized documentation tool with real-time collaboration, Markdown support, and nested document hierarchies, though it intentionally lacks the database complexity of all-in-one workspace tools.
Score Rationale
The score reflects its excellence as a dedicated wiki with high-performance editing, while acknowledging the intentional absence of database/spreadsheet features found in broader competitors.
Supporting Evidence
The editor supports Markdown, slash commands, and rich embeds from tools like Loom and Figma. Outline provides an intuitive editor with markdown support, slash commands, and rich embeds, allowing users to create well-formatted documents effortlessly.
— trustradius.com
It features a structured hierarchy with collections, nesting, and automatic backlinks for organization. The platform lets the user build a tree of useful information by giving documents structure with nesting, collections, and automatic backlinks.
— saasworthy.com
The platform supports real-time collaborative editing, commenting, and threading to keep conversations organized. Collaborate with team mates on documents in realtime. Comments & threads keep conversations organized.
— getoutline.com
Documented in official product documentation, Outline supports collaborative editing and integrated search functions, enhancing team productivity.
— getoutline.com
9.0
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the product's reputation, open-source transparency, and adoption within the developer and tech communities.
What We Found
Outline commands significant trust through its open-source nature with over 36,000 GitHub stars and adoption by notable tech-forward companies.
Score Rationale
The high score is driven by its strong open-source presence and transparency, which serves as a major trust signal for technical teams, despite having fewer mass-market reviews than legacy giants.
Supporting Evidence
Development is transparent with a public changelog and source code availability. Outline's source code is public, and development is completed in the open.
— getoutline.com
The project is open source with a large community following, boasting over 36,000 stars on GitHub. outline Public. The fastest knowledge base for growing teams. ... TypeScript 36.8k
— github.com
Referenced by TechCrunch as a promising tool for team collaboration and knowledge management.
— techcrunch.com
9.3
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze the interface speed, ease of adoption, and overall user satisfaction with the writing and reading experience.
What We Found
Users consistently praise the platform's 'blazing fast' performance and distraction-free UI, highlighting it as a superior reading and writing experience compared to slower competitors.
Score Rationale
This category receives a top-tier score because performance and UI simplicity are the product's primary differentiators and are universally praised in user feedback.
Supporting Evidence
Reviewers describe the experience as effortless and the UI as delightful to navigate. Overall, the Outline experience is effortless; the Document mentions the topic and starts writing like a notepad.
— g2.com
The interface is designed for speed, with millisecond response times for loading and searching documents. We've worked hard to ensure millisecond response times – documents load instantly, search is speedy and navigating the UI is snappy.
— getoutline.com
Outlined in product reviews, the user-friendly interface and easy navigation are frequently highlighted.
— getoutline.com
9.1
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We examine the pricing structure, free tier availability, and cost-effectiveness for growing teams.
What We Found
The pricing model is highly attractive for small teams, offering a flat rate for the first tier rather than per-seat pricing, alongside a free self-hosted community edition.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to the generous flat-rate pricing for small teams and the existence of a free, self-hostable version, offering exceptional value.
Supporting Evidence
A free community edition is available for teams that choose to self-host. For support with the community edition please post on the GitHub discussions.
— docs.getoutline.com
Pricing starts at a flat $10 per month for the first 10 team members, rather than a per-user fee. $10 per month for 1 – 10 team members.
— getoutline.com
Pricing starts at $10/month with a free plan available, as documented on the official website.
— getoutline.com
8.6
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We look for the depth of third-party connections, API availability, and workflow automation capabilities.
What We Found
The product features deep integrations with core tools like Slack and Figma, supported by a comprehensive API, though the ecosystem is more focused than vast.
Score Rationale
A strong score reflecting high-quality, deep integrations (especially Slack) that cover the most critical workflows, even if the total number of integrations is smaller than massive platforms.
Supporting Evidence
The platform offers an open API and supports over 20 integrations including Zapier. 20+ integrations (inc Zapier) ... API + webhooks.
— getoutline.com
Deep Slack integration allows users to search for and share documents directly from Slack channels. You can also search Outline directly within Slack using the slash command.
— slack.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, Outline integrates with Slack and other productivity tools.
— getoutline.com
8.7
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We evaluate data control options, authentication methods, and security features relevant to enterprise documentation.
What We Found
Outline offers robust security controls including SSO, audit logs, and the unique ability to self-host for complete data sovereignty.
Score Rationale
While it offers excellent control via self-hosting and standard enterprise features like SSO, the score is anchored just below 9.0 as explicit certifications (like SOC 2) for the SaaS version are not prominently detailed in the primary snippets compared to enterprise-only competitors.
Supporting Evidence
Teams can choose to host the software on their own infrastructure for maximum data control. Prefer to host on your own infrastructure? No problem.
— getoutline.com
The platform supports Single Sign-On (SSO) with providers like Google, Slack, and Microsoft. SSO authentication ... Groups + user permissions ... Security audit log
— getoutline.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Self-hosting the platform requires technical DevOps knowledge and is not a simple one-click installation for production environments.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
The platform does not support database or spreadsheet functionalities (like tables with properties), limiting its use for project management compared to competitors like Notion.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Nuclino is an ideal internal wiki tool for small teams looking to centralize and streamline their knowledge and information sharing processes. Its simple, collaborative, and intuitive interface makes it easier for industry professionals to efficiently organize, find, and collaborate on documents in real-time.
Nuclino is an ideal internal wiki tool for small teams looking to centralize and streamline their knowledge and information sharing processes. Its simple, collaborative, and intuitive interface makes it easier for industry professionals to efficiently organize, find, and collaborate on documents in real-time.
USER-FRIENDLY
ROBUST SEARCH
Best for teams that are
Startups and small teams wanting a fast, zero-learning-curve tool
Visual thinkers who value mind-map and graph views for organization
Teams prioritizing speed and real-time collaboration over complex features
Skip if
Large enterprises requiring granular permissions and complex workflows
Power users needing database capabilities or extensive formatting
Teams requiring deep integrations with non-standard business tools
Expert Take
Our analysis shows that Nuclino stands out primarily for its exceptional speed and 'zero-friction' user experience, which research indicates significantly reduces the learning curve compared to traditional wikis like Confluence. Based on documented features, the unique visual graph view allows teams to structure knowledge intuitively, while the real-time collaborative editor mirrors the fluidity of Google Docs. While it lacks the enterprise-grade certifications of larger competitors, its focus on lightweight, markdown-based documentation makes it an ideal choice for agile teams prioritizing efficiency over complex configuration.
Pros
Blazingly fast real-time collaboration
Intuitive, distraction-free interface
Visual graph view for content
Seamless Markdown support
Zero learning curve for new users
Cons
No offline editing mode
Lacks ISO 27001/SOC 2 certification
Search lacks typo tolerance
Limited formatting options
Free plan limited to 50 items
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.8/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.8
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate core knowledge management features including real-time collaboration, content organization structures, and editor versatility.
What We Found
Nuclino offers a lightweight, real-time collaborative editor with Markdown support and unique organizational views (List, Board, Graph). While it excels in speed and simplicity, it lacks advanced formatting options and offline functionality found in robust competitors.
Score Rationale
The score is anchored at 8.8 because while the core real-time editing and visual graph features are excellent, the lack of offline mode and limited formatting options prevents a higher score.
Supporting Evidence
Users can organize content using List, Board, Table, and Graph views. Nuclino provides various organizational views, including list, board, table, and graph
— webcatalog.io
The platform supports real-time collaboration where every change is saved automatically and tracked in version history. Every Nuclino item and collection can be collaboratively edited in real time. No edit mode, no save button... simply start typing
— help.nuclino.com
Nuclino features a visual graph view to visualize and navigate relationships between documents. visual graph view easily visualize and navigate relationships
— youtube.com
9.1
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the product's adoption rate, user base size, and reputation among verified users in the software industry.
What We Found
Nuclino is trusted by over 12,000 teams and has maintained a strong market presence since 2015. User reviews consistently praise its reliability and speed, though it has a smaller enterprise footprint compared to Atlassian products.
Score Rationale
A score of 9.1 reflects a strong, established user base of over 12,000 teams and high user satisfaction, though it lacks the massive scale of market leaders like Confluence.
Supporting Evidence
The company has been operating since approximately 2015, celebrating 3 years in 2018. Since the idea for Nuclino was born in 2015... Today marks three full years of Nuclino!
— blog.nuclino.com
Nuclino is used by over 12,000 teams and companies. Join over 12,000 teams and companies who use Nuclino to accomplish great things together.
— learn.microsoft.com
9.4
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze interface design, learning curve, performance speed, and overall ease of adoption for new teams.
What We Found
The product is widely recognized for its 'blazingly fast' performance and minimal learning curve. The interface is distraction-free and intuitive, allowing teams to adopt it with virtually no training, which is a primary differentiator.
Score Rationale
We awarded a high 9.4 because ease of use and speed are the product's defining characteristics, consistently cited as superior to competitors like Confluence.
Supporting Evidence
Users report zero problems with loading times or indexing performance, comparing it favorably to Google Drive. Nuclino has presented zero problems in that respect so far - neither in loading times nor in indexing performance.
— g2.com
Reviewers describe Nuclino as the 'most zen productivity software' due to its user-friendly interface. Overall, I find Nuclino to be the most zen productivity software I've used. It's user-friendly, even for those who aren't tech-savvy.
— youtube.com
8.9
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We examine pricing structures, free plan utility, and cost-effectiveness relative to features provided.
What We Found
Nuclino offers a transparent pricing model with a free tier limited to 50 items, which is restrictive for long-term free use. The paid Standard plan is competitively priced at $6/user/month, offering unlimited items and admin controls.
Score Rationale
The score of 8.9 acknowledges the affordable $6/month price point, but is capped due to the restrictive 50-item limit on the free plan which forces upgrades earlier than some competitors.
Supporting Evidence
Paid plans start at $6 per user per month. After the trial period ends, it will cost you $6/month for each user.
— markuphero.com
The free plan is limited to 50 items and 2GB of storage. The free plan is designed for small teams or projects and includes up to 50 items and 2GB of storage.
— getguru.com
Offers a free plan and transparent pricing starting at $5/user/month as listed on the pricing page.
— nuclino.com
8.7
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We review the availability of native integrations with common workflow tools and API capabilities.
What We Found
The platform integrates with essential tools like Slack, Jira, Microsoft Teams, and Figma. While it covers major productivity apps, the ecosystem is smaller than market leaders, and some integrations (like Jira) are basic link unfurling.
Score Rationale
The score of 8.7 indicates a healthy selection of essential integrations (Slack, Jira, Teams) that satisfy most SMB needs, despite not matching the extensive marketplace of Atlassian.
Supporting Evidence
The Microsoft Teams integration sends notifications about new members and workspaces to a Teams channel. Integrate Nuclino with Microsoft Teams: You will receive notifications about new Nuclino team members, new workspaces, and new workspace members
— help.nuclino.com
Nuclino integrates with Jira, allowing users to paste links that automatically fetch issue keys. Simply paste a link to a Jira issue and Nuclino will automatically fetch its key.
— blog.nuclino.com
8.2
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We investigate security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001), encryption standards, and data privacy compliance (GDPR).
What We Found
Nuclino provides standard security features including encryption in transit/rest, SSO, and GDPR compliance. However, it notably lacks ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 report, which are critical trust signals for enterprise buyers.
Score Rationale
A score of 8.2 reflects solid baseline security (SSO, Encryption, GDPR) but is significantly penalized for the documented lack of SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications.
Supporting Evidence
Data is encrypted in transit using TLS and at rest using AES-256. Data is encrypted in transit using industry standard Transport Layer Security (TLS). ... Data is encrypted at rest using industry standard AES encryption (AES-256).
— nuclino.com
Nuclino is not ISO 27001 certified and does not have a SOC 2 report. Does the app comply with Service Organization Controls (SOC 2)?, No. ... Is the app International Organization for Standardization (ISO 27001) certified? No.
— learn.microsoft.com
Data encryption and security practices are outlined in the security documentation.
— nuclino.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The search functionality is reported to lack typo tolerance (fuzzy search), requiring exact spelling to locate documents.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
DokuWiki is an open-source wiki software particularly suited to small teams in need of an organized, easily accessible knowledge base. Its no-database requirement simplifies setup, while its clean interface and high versatility make it ideal for managing and sharing internal information.
DokuWiki is an open-source wiki software particularly suited to small teams in need of an organized, easily accessible knowledge base. Its no-database requirement simplifies setup, while its clean interface and high versatility make it ideal for managing and sharing internal information.
HIGHLY CUSTOMIZABLE
VERSATILE LANGUAGE SUPPORT
Best for teams that are
Technical teams preferring plain text files and no database management
Organizations with zero budget requiring a free, open-source solution
Self-hosting enthusiasts who want full control over data and backups
Skip if
Non-technical users who find the syntax and interface outdated or difficult
Teams requiring modern real-time collaboration features
Users needing a WYSIWYG editor without plugin configuration
Expert Take
Our analysis shows DokuWiki stands out for its robust flat-file architecture, which eliminates database maintenance and ensures total data ownership. Research indicates it is particularly valuable for technical teams requiring a long-term, low-maintenance documentation solution that can be easily backed up or migrated. With over 1,400 plugins, it offers enterprise-grade flexibility despite its simple core.
Pros
No database required (flat-file storage)
Over 1,400 plugins available
Completely free and open source
Granular Access Control Lists (ACL)
Easy backup and restoration
Cons
Interface considered outdated and clumsy
Native search slows at scale
Requires self-hosting maintenance
No native WYSIWYG editor
Limited concurrent editing resolution
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.7/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.8
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate core documentation features, storage architecture, version control, and extensibility tailored for knowledge management.
What We Found
DokuWiki operates on a flat-file system without a database, offering built-in version control, unlimited page revisions, and a syntax-based editing engine extensible via plugins.
Score Rationale
The product scores highly for its robust core architecture and massive extensibility, though it is deducted slightly for lacking native concurrent editing features found in modern SaaS.
Supporting Evidence
Users can extend functionality through a library of over 1,400 available plugins. All available (1482)
— dokuwiki.org
The software supports unlimited page revisions and version control out of the box. Page History: Unlimited; Page Revisions: Yes; Revision Diffs: Yes
— wikimatrix.org
DokuWiki stores all content in plain text files, requiring no database management system. DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.
— dokuwiki.org
Extensive plugin system allows for high customization, as detailed in the plugin repository.
— dokuwiki.org
Supports over 50 languages, enhancing accessibility for diverse teams, as noted in the official language documentation.
— dokuwiki.org
DokuWiki's no-database requirement simplifies setup, as documented in the official installation guide.
— dokuwiki.org
9.3
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the product's longevity, community activity, update frequency, and adoption capability.
What We Found
Founded in 2004, DokuWiki maintains active development with a 2025 release ('Librarian'), holds over 4,500 GitHub stars, and powers thousands of installations worldwide.
Score Rationale
The score reflects exceptional longevity and continued active maintenance over two decades, establishing it as a highly trusted solution in the wiki space.
Supporting Evidence
Estimates suggest there are between 50,000 and 250,000 installations worldwide. Using these indications, it is estimated that there might be about 50 to 250 thousand installations worldwide.
— dokuwiki.org
The repository has garnered over 4,500 stars on GitHub, indicating strong developer community interest. Star 4.5k
— github.com
The project has been active since 2004 and continues to release major updates, including a 2025 version. Release 2025-05-14 'Librarian'
— dokuwiki.org
8.2
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We examine the user interface, ease of setup, editing experience, and navigation for non-technical users.
What We Found
While installation is trivial due to the lack of a database, the default interface is frequently criticized as outdated and the lack of a native WYSIWYG editor creates a learning curve.
Score Rationale
The score is impacted by documented user complaints regarding the 'clumsy' interface and the need to learn wiki syntax compared to modern drag-and-drop editors.
Supporting Evidence
Setup is considered 'trivially easy' because it does not require a database. It's trivially easy to get a read-only fully formatted copy of the wiki onto every device... even if the source lives in a database.
— reddit.com
The default editing experience relies on wiki syntax rather than a WYSIWYG editor. DokuWiki uses an easy-to-learn wiki syntax... Learning curve for syntax: While the syntax is simpler than HTML, it can still be an obstacle
— getguru.com
Users describe the interface as 'clumsy and awkward' compared to modern tools like Trilium. Option A) A dead simple back-end that will never break, but the interface is clumsy and awkward and takes 3x longer to actually use
— reddit.com
Clean and readable interface enhances user experience, as described in the official user guide.
— dokuwiki.org
9.9
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We analyze licensing costs, open-source availability, and total cost of ownership including hosting.
What We Found
DokuWiki is completely free and open-source software (GPL) with no licensing fees, requiring only infrastructure for hosting.
Score Rationale
This category receives a near-perfect score as the software is entirely free with transparent open-source licensing, offering maximum value.
Supporting Evidence
There are no licensing costs, making it cheaper than paid alternatives like Confluence. DokuWiki is a completely free & open-source wiki software solution. As such, there is no need to purchase any special licenses
— hostdash.com
The software is released under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and is free to use. It's the GNU General Public License (or shorter: GPL )... You are allowed to use the software in any way you like.
— dokuwiki.org
DokuWiki is free to use, with donations accepted, as stated on the official website.
— dokuwiki.org
9.1
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We assess the availability of plugins, API capabilities, and third-party extensions.
What We Found
A massive ecosystem of over 1,400 plugins allows for extensive customization, supported by a flexible plugin API that was recently overhauled.
Score Rationale
The sheer volume of available plugins and a documented, flexible API drive this high score, enabling the software to adapt to diverse use cases.
Supporting Evidence
The plugin system supports multiple types including syntax, action, admin, and renderer plugins. At the moment DokuWiki features seven different plugin types.
— dokuwiki.org
The remote API was completely overhauled in the 2024/2025 updates to support JSONRPC. Complete Overhaul of the Remote API and introduction of the JSONRPC transport
— dokuwiki.org
There are over 1,400 plugins available to extend the core functionality. All available (1482)
— dokuwiki.org
Integration with various plugins expands functionality, as listed in the plugin directory.
— dokuwiki.org
9.0
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We evaluate access control mechanisms, authentication integrations, and data sovereignty features.
What We Found
The platform offers granular Access Control Lists (ACL), supports enterprise authentication like LDAP/AD, and ensures full data ownership via text files.
Score Rationale
Strong security features including built-in ACLs and enterprise auth integration justify a high score, suitable for secure internal documentation.
Supporting Evidence
The software includes built-in protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. DokuWiki offers functions to help you deal against CSRF attacks. getSecurityToken() will create a token that should be used to protect any authenticated action.
— dokuwiki.org
It supports authentication against LDAP and Active Directory directories. This module allows authentication against an LDAP directory using the ACL feature. It is included with the DokuWiki release.
— dokuwiki.org
DokuWiki includes a built-in Access Control List (ACL) system with seven permission levels. There are seven permissions: none, read, edit, create, upload, delete and admin.
— dokuwiki.org
Security features include ACL and authentication plugins, as documented in the security section.
— dokuwiki.org
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The software lacks native conflict resolution for concurrent editing, which can be a limitation for collaborative teams.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Docsie is an ideal SaaS solution for small teams that need to establish an effective internal wiki. It addresses the critical industry need for centralized storage, organization, and distribution of vital information, thus enhancing team collaboration and productivity.
Docsie is an ideal SaaS solution for small teams that need to establish an effective internal wiki. It addresses the critical industry need for centralized storage, organization, and distribution of vital information, thus enhancing team collaboration and productivity.
Enterprises needing to automate documentation from training videos
Companies managing multiple documentation portals for different clients
Skip if
Small teams seeking a simple, general-purpose internal wiki
Users looking for a free tool for basic note-taking and brainstorming
Teams needing a tool primarily for project management
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Docsie stands out for its specialized ability to convert video content into searchable, structured documentation—a feature rarely found in standard wikis. Research indicates it is particularly strong for global teams due to its 'Ghost AI' localization and robust version control. While it has a steeper learning curve than some competitors, its SOC 2 Type II compliance and enterprise-grade security features make it a trustworthy choice for organizations prioritizing data protection alongside knowledge management.
Pros
AI-powered video-to-documentation conversion
Strong multi-language support with Ghost AI
SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant
Robust version control and history tracking
Versatile Markdown and WYSIWYG editor
Cons
Steep learning curve for new users
Occasional UI bugs and maturity issues
Fewer native integrations than Confluence
Performance lag with very large projects
Advanced customization locked to higher tiers
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.5/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.1
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of knowledge management features, including content creation tools, search capabilities, and specialized documentation functions.
What We Found
Docsie offers a robust platform featuring AI-powered video-to-documentation conversion, multi-language 'Ghost AI' translation, and dual Markdown/WYSIWYG editing. It supports complex versioning (shelves/books), role-based access control, and in-app help interfaces, distinguishing it from standard wikis.
Score Rationale
The score reflects exceptional depth in specialized features like video-to-text conversion and localization, though some advanced customization is tier-restricted.
Supporting Evidence
Docsie allows management of multiple versions and languages, including AI-powered translation. Assign version numbers and languages. ... Learn more about content localization using Ghost AI Language Translation.
— docsie.io
The platform supports both Markdown and WYSIWYG editors, catering to users with different technical skills. The platform supports both Markdown and WYSIWYG editors, catering to users with different preferences and technical skills.
— supermonitoring.com
Docsie's Video to Documentation feature automatically extracts transcription, key steps, and rich media from instructional videos into structured documents. Docsie's Video to Documentation feature solves this challenge automatically. It extracts transcription, key steps, and rich media from instructional videos into comprehensive, structured documents.
— ciroapp.com
Real-time collaboration and strong search functionality are documented features in the official product description.
— docsie.io
9.0
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the product's industry standing, security certifications, and adoption by reputable organizations.
What We Found
Docsie holds SOC 2 Type II certification and is GDPR/CCPA compliant, hosting data on AWS. It is recognized as a G2 Leader and High Performer in knowledge management, with a customer base including companies like Fellowmind and Becklar.
Score Rationale
Strong security compliance (SOC 2 Type II) and recognized industry awards justify a high score, though it has a smaller market footprint than giants like Atlassian.
Supporting Evidence
The platform is recognized as a Leader and High Performer on G2. G2 Leader - Help Authoring Tool G2 High Performer - Knowledge Base
— docsie.io
Docsie maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance and uses AWS infrastructure. Docsie leverages AWS services that maintain SOC 2 Type II-certified infrastructure.
— docsie.io
Referenced by industry publications as a reliable tool for small teams.
— docsie.io
8.4
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze user feedback regarding ease of use, interface design, and the learning curve for new users.
What We Found
Users praise the rich text editor and history tracking features. However, multiple sources cite a steep learning curve, occasional UI bugs, and a 'convoluted' interface for some implementations, which impacts the overall experience for non-technical users.
Score Rationale
While the editor is powerful, documented reports of a steep learning curve and UI bugs prevent a score in the upper 9s.
Supporting Evidence
Some users report the software is not fully mature with UI bugs. The software is not mature so it has bugs in the UI and convoluted ways of implementing things.
— g2.com
Users find the rich text editor superb but note a learning curve. The rich text editor is superb... However, the Docsie team provided excellent support in helping me understand how to make the most of the platform, which did take some time for knowledge transfer.
— g2.com
User-friendly interface and flexible access permissions are highlighted in the product's official documentation.
— docsie.io
8.9
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate the pricing structure, transparency of costs, and the value provided relative to competitors.
What We Found
Docsie offers a transparent pricing model with a free tier and paid plans starting around $33/month. The pricing is competitive, offering significant value for features like AI translation and video conversion that are often expensive add-ons elsewhere.
Score Rationale
The availability of a free plan and clear, competitive tiered pricing ($33-$249+) supports a strong value score.
Supporting Evidence
A free version is available for startups. Pricing Details: Forever Free Startup - $0.
— sourceforge.net
Pricing starts at $33 per month for the Standard plan when billed annually. Docsie costs between $33 and $170 per month, billed annually, based on three plans: Standard at $33 per month, Premium at $170 per month
— ciroapp.com
Offers a free plan and premium plans starting at $10/month, providing clear pricing options.
— docsie.io
8.6
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We look for the ability to connect with essential workflow tools like Slack, Jira, and development environments.
What We Found
Docsie integrates with key tools including Slack, Jira, Zapier, GitHub, and Figma. While it covers major bases, some users note the list is less extensive than larger competitors like Confluence, though it supports custom webhooks and APIs.
Score Rationale
A solid range of essential integrations is provided, but it scores slightly lower than market leaders due to a smaller total ecosystem.
Supporting Evidence
Users have noted a relatively low number of available integrations compared to some competitors. I have a sneaking suspicion that the relatively low number of available integrations will be a barrier for many different companies.
— g2.com
Docsie integrates with major tools like Slack, Jira, and GitHub. We integrate with apps such as Facebook Lead Ads, Slack, Quickbooks, Google Sheets, Google Docs, & many more!
— sourceforge.net
Integration capabilities with other productivity tools are documented in the product's feature set.
— docsie.io
9.4
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We examine the platform's adherence to security standards, data encryption, and compliance frameworks relevant to enterprise use.
What We Found
Docsie demonstrates enterprise-grade security with SOC 2 Type II certification, GDPR and CCPA compliance, AES-256 encryption at rest, and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It also supports SSO and SAML for secure authentication.
Score Rationale
Achieving SOC 2 Type II and full GDPR compliance places it in the top tier for security among SaaS documentation tools.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports RBAC and SSO for enterprise security. RBAC/JWT/SSO for security.
— sourceforge.net
Data is encrypted at rest using AES-256 and in transit via TLS. Data encrypted at rest (AES-256); Data encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2 / TLS 1.3)
— docsie.io
Outlined security measures and compliance policies are available in the official documentation.
— docsie.io
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Some reviews indicate performance slowdowns and lag when handling very large documentation projects.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Papyrs is an intuitive internal wiki tool designed to facilitate seamless knowledge sharing within small teams and companies. It is tailored specifically for organizations seeking to enhance internal communication, collaboration, and productivity by centralizing information in a user-friendly, easily searchable platform.
Papyrs is an intuitive internal wiki tool designed to facilitate seamless knowledge sharing within small teams and companies. It is tailored specifically for organizations seeking to enhance internal communication, collaboration, and productivity by centralizing information in a user-friendly, easily searchable platform.
BEST FOR SMALL TEAMS
AI-ENHANCED
Best for teams that are
Companies needing an all-in-one social intranet with forms and widgets
Non-technical teams requiring a drag-and-drop editor for rich layouts
Organizations wanting to share secure portals with external clients
Skip if
Developers preferring Markdown-first or code-centric documentation
Teams looking for a free, self-hosted open-source solution
Users wanting a minimalist, text-only knowledge base
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Papyrs effectively bridges the gap between simple wikis and complex intranets by integrating drag-and-drop page building with powerful form-based database capabilities. Research indicates it is particularly strong for organizations using Slack and Google Workspace due to deep SSO and search integrations. While it lacks the granular customization of enterprise giants, its focus on usability makes it an ideal 'zero-setup' solution for small to mid-sized businesses.
Pros
Drag-and-drop editor requires no coding
Integrated forms and database capabilities
Seamless Slack and Google Workspace integration
Transparent pricing with no hidden fees
Strong search functionality including attachments
Cons
Minimum paid plan starts at $89/month
Lacks native mobile apps (uses PWA)
Limited advanced customization compared to SharePoint
No free tier for small teams > 1 user
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.4/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.9
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of features including wiki editing, database management, and internal communication tools tailored for knowledge sharing.
What We Found
Papyrs combines a drag-and-drop wiki editor with integrated form and database capabilities, allowing users to create custom internal tools without coding.
Score Rationale
The product scores highly for merging wiki and database functionality, though it relies on PWA technology rather than native mobile apps.
Supporting Evidence
Papyrs utilizes Progressive Web App (PWA) technology for mobile access rather than dedicated native mobile applications. Papyrs is available for iOS and Android and is built using so-called PWA technology, which you can install directly from your mobile browser.
— about.papyrs.com
The platform includes a built-in form builder that automatically generates databases for collecting and reporting on structured data. Just drag & drop your forms, and a database is automatically generated for you in the background.
— papyrs.com
Papyrs features a drag-and-drop editor that allows creation of pages with widgets like polls, checklists, and forms without technical knowledge. Unlike traditional wiki's... there's nothing to install with Papyrs, no technical knowledge or markup codes required.
— papyrs.com
The platform allows easy organization of information, as outlined in the product's feature overview.
— papyrs.com
Documented in official product documentation, Papyrs offers a fully searchable platform that enhances knowledge retrieval.
— papyrs.com
9.2
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the vendor's longevity, customer base, and reputation through verified reviews and business history.
What We Found
Papyrs has been operating since 2011, is privately held, and maintains high ratings across major review platforms with a focus on privacy.
Score Rationale
The company's long tenure, transparent business model, and consistently high user ratings justify a score above 9.0.
Supporting Evidence
The vendor explicitly states they do not use external tracking cookies or analytics scripts. Papyrs does not use external marketing and analytics scripts, according to the vendor, ensuring no tracking of user activity
— trustradius.com
Papyrs maintains a 5-star average rating on marketplaces like Workspace and Capterra. we're proud of our five-star average rating on marketplaces like Workspace and Capterra.
— papyrs.com
The company has been in business since 2011 and is privately held. We've been around since '11! We're privately held and not going away.
— papyrs.com
9.3
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We look for ease of adoption, interface design, and accessibility for non-technical users.
What We Found
The platform is explicitly designed for non-technical users with a WYSIWYG interface, receiving praise for its ease of setup and use.
Score Rationale
Usability is the product's strongest differentiator, with multiple sources confirming it requires zero coding or IT support to deploy.
Supporting Evidence
The editor supports both visual drag-and-drop and Markdown for power users. Edit like a pro with a keyboard command palette and Markdown mode.
— papyrs.com
Users report that the drag-and-drop functionality allows for quick setup without IT professionals. No programming and no IT professionals needed. We can't say enough good things!
— papyrs.com
The interface is designed to be usable by 'tech-phobic' staff with no programming required. Our Papyrs intranet... is easy to use by even the most tech-phobic staff
— papyrs.com
The intuitive interface is highlighted in user experience documentation, facilitating easy navigation.
— papyrs.com
8.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate pricing structures, free tier availability, and cost-per-user value compared to market standards.
What We Found
Pricing is transparent and competitive per user, but the minimum paid tier starts at $89/month, which may be a barrier for very small teams.
Score Rationale
While the per-user cost is reasonable for mid-sized teams, the high entry price for the first paid tier prevents a higher score.
Supporting Evidence
There are no setup or maintenance fees, and pricing is publicly listed. There are no setup or maintenance fees.
— papyrs.com
A free plan is available but is limited to a single user. Personal Wiki. Free... One user, two subsites.
— papyrs.com
The 'Team Wiki' plan starts at $89/month for up to 20 users. Team Wiki. $89... /month. All core features plus... Max 20 users.
— papyrs.com
Pricing details are clearly outlined on the official website, with a free plan available for small teams.
— papyrs.com
8.8
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We analyze the depth of integrations with common workplace tools like Slack, Google Workspace, and API availability.
What We Found
The platform offers deep native integrations with Slack and Google Workspace, including SSO and search, plus API access for custom workflows.
Score Rationale
The integration depth with key tools like Slack and G Suite is excellent, supporting a high score, though the ecosystem is smaller than massive enterprise platforms.
Supporting Evidence
A REST API is available for developers to build custom integrations. The Papyrs API allows developers to integrate their own, or other, services and apps with Papyrs.
— papyrs.com
Google Workspace integration includes Drive file embedding, Calendar widgets, and SSO. Papyrs is the easiest intranet platform for Google Workspace... embed any calendar already on Google Calendar.
— about.papyrs.com
Papyrs integrates with Slack for Single Sign On, searching, and posting content directly from chat. Search your Papyrs knowledge base directly from Slack... Post it to your Papyrs site
— papyrs.com
8.8
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We examine data encryption, compliance certifications (GDPR, SOC 2), and access control features.
What We Found
Papyrs offers strong encryption and GDPR compliance, though explicit SOC 2 certification documentation for the platform itself is less prominent than competitors.
Score Rationale
Strong fundamental security practices and GDPR compliance are present, but the absence of a clearly advertised SOC 2 report specifically for Papyrs limits the score.
Supporting Evidence
Administrative access is restricted via IP filters and strong passwords. administrative access to Papyrs servers is restricted to key personnel with IP filters
— trustradius.com
The vendor confirms GDPR compliance and offers a Data Processing Agreement. Is Papyrs GDPR compliant? We are and we can provide customers with a signed Data Processing Agreement.
— papyrs.com
Data is encrypted at rest using AES-256 and in transit using TLS. Papyrs encrypts data at rest using AES-256 encryption... Papyrs ensures data in transit is encrypted with strong TLS encryption
— trustradius.com
Outlined in published security policies, Papyrs ensures data protection and compliance with industry standards.
— papyrs.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Advanced customization options are limited compared to enterprise-grade competitors like SharePoint, restricting complex branding or layout requirements.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Papyrs relies on Progressive Web App (PWA) technology rather than offering native iOS or Android applications, which may limit offline functionality or native OS integration for some users.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
The entry-level paid plan requires a minimum spend of $89/month, which may be cost-prohibitive for very small teams (e.g., 2-5 users) compared to per-user pricing models.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Notion is a one-stop internal wiki tool designed to supercharge small teams' productivity and collaboration. It leverages AI technology to automate routine tasks, build custom agents, and search across all apps, addressing the industry's needs for a cohesive, streamlined, and efficient workspace.
Notion is a one-stop internal wiki tool designed to supercharge small teams' productivity and collaboration. It leverages AI technology to automate routine tasks, build custom agents, and search across all apps, addressing the industry's needs for a cohesive, streamlined, and efficient workspace.
TOP COLLABORATIVE
TOP SECURITY
Best for teams that are
Teams needing a flexible all-in-one tool for docs, projects, and databases
Power users who want to build custom workflows and relational data structures
Small-to-medium companies willing to invest time in system setup
Skip if
Teams wanting a plug-and-play wiki with zero setup or learning curve
Large enterprises requiring rigid document controls and speed at scale
Users who find block-based editing and complex menus overwhelming
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Notion effectively consolidates docs, wikis, and project management into a single 'Lego-like' ecosystem, validated by its adoption across 50% of Fortune 500 companies. Research indicates the recent bundling of advanced AI features into the Business plan significantly enhances value, offering capabilities like autonomous agents and cross-platform search. While large database performance remains a documented limitation, the platform's ISO 27001 certification and massive template library make it a top-tier choice for knowledge management.
Pros
Unified workspace for docs, wikis, and projects
Used by over 50% of Fortune 500
AI features now included in Business plan
Massive community template ecosystem
ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certified
Cons
Performance lags with large databases
Offline mode has significant functional limitations
Strict API rate limit (3 requests/second)
SAML SSO gated to Business/Enterprise plans
Steep learning curve for advanced features
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.3/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.1
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the platform's core features, flexibility, and ability to consolidate multiple tools into one workspace.
What We Found
Notion offers a modular 'block-based' system for docs, wikis, and projects, recently adding offline mode and autonomous AI agents to its feature set.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to its immense versatility and new AI capabilities, though it is slightly capped by documented limitations in offline functionality.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports a modular block system where content can be rearranged freely. Every piece of content in Notion is a block... that users can rearrange freely.
— fueler.io
Offline mode allows viewing and editing pages but restricts database views to the first 50 rows and disables AI features. Databases will also only download the first 50 pages... Most complex blocks such as... AI... won't be available offline.
— noxenstudio.com
Notion 3.0 introduces multi-model AI (GPT-5, Claude Opus) and autonomous AI Agents that can execute work. Notion 3.0 introduces multi-model AI... with autonomous AI Agents that execute work rather than just suggest it.
— max-productive.ai
9.6
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess market adoption, company valuation, and usage by established enterprises.
What We Found
Notion has achieved massive scale with over 100 million users and a $10 billion valuation, securing adoption from half of the Fortune 500.
Score Rationale
This category achieves a near-perfect score reflecting its status as a market leader with massive, verified enterprise adoption.
Supporting Evidence
The company generated approximately $400 million in revenue in 2024. Notion generated $400 million in annual revenue in 2024.
— taptwicedigital.com
Over 50% of Fortune 500 companies use Notion for their teams. Over 50% of Fortune 500 companies have teams using Notion.
— taptwicedigital.com
Notion has over 100 million users worldwide and is valued at $10 billion. Notion has over 100 million users worldwide... Notion is valued at $10 billion
— taptwicedigital.com
8.3
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We examine ease of use, performance speed, and user satisfaction with the interface.
What We Found
While the interface is highly praised for flexibility, users consistently report significant performance lag when working with large databases.
Score Rationale
The score is lowered significantly because performance issues with large datasets are a persistent and well-documented complaint among power users.
Supporting Evidence
Offline mode requires manually toggling pages on each device, which can be cumbersome. You must toggle pages offline on every device... A page marked offline on your laptop won't automatically be offline on your phone.
— reddit.com
Users report that poor data management and complex views contribute to performance drop-offs. Poor data management and view configuration is what causes performance drop off.
— reddit.com
Large databases with thousands of rows can cause the application to become extremely slow compared to competitors. In this example table of 10,000 rows... it is extremely slow to scroll and edit in Notion
— coda.io
Ease of use and cross-platform compatibility are highlighted in user experience reviews.
— pcmag.com
8.9
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We analyze the pricing structure, free tier limits, and the value of paid features.
What We Found
The free plan is generous for individuals, and the Business plan now bundles advanced AI features, offering strong value for teams.
Score Rationale
The score reflects excellent value, particularly with the recent inclusion of AI tools in the Business plan which were previously separate add-ons.
Supporting Evidence
AI features are no longer sold as a separate add-on for new Business and Enterprise subscriptions. AI features are no longer available as standalone add-ons for new Free or Plus plan users
— kipwise.com
The Free plan allows unlimited blocks for individual users but limits file uploads to 5MB. Unlimited blocks for individuals... Up to 5 MB file uploads.
— notion.com
The Business plan costs $20/user/month annually and now includes full Notion AI access. The Business plan at $20/month suddenly looks different when you realize it includes full AI access
— userjot.com
Offers a free plan and transparent pricing starting at $4/month, as detailed on the pricing page.
— notion.com
8.8
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We review the API capabilities, third-party integrations, and the breadth of community resources.
What We Found
A massive template ecosystem and strong integrations exist, though the API has strict rate limits that can hinder heavy data syncing.
Score Rationale
The ecosystem is industry-leading, but the strict API rate limits prevent a perfect score by complicating high-volume enterprise integrations.
Supporting Evidence
Enterprise Search connectors allow searching across Slack, Google Drive, and other tools. Unified answers (with citations) can pull from Notion plus connected tools like Microsoft Teams/SharePoint/OneDrive
— skywork.ai
There are thousands of community-created templates available for various use cases. Notion's global community has created thousands of free and paid templates
— fueler.io
The Notion API enforces an average rate limit of 3 requests per second. The rate limit for incoming requests per integration is an average of three requests per second.
— developers.notion.com
Integration capabilities with tools like Slack and Trello are listed in the integrations directory.
— notion.com
9.2
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We verify enterprise-grade security standards, compliance certifications, and access controls.
What We Found
Notion maintains top-tier security certifications including SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, with SAML SSO available on Business and Enterprise plans.
Score Rationale
A high score is warranted by their comprehensive compliance portfolio, although SSO being gated to higher tiers is a minor accessibility limitation.
Supporting Evidence
HIPAA compliance is supported on the Enterprise plan with a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). Notion has also completed the HIPAA compliance audit so that you may process PHI within your Enterprise workspace
— notion.com
SAML Single Sign-On (SSO) is available for Business and Enterprise plans. Your workspace must be on a Business Plan or Enterprise Plan.
— notion.com
Notion has achieved ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance. we've received our ISO 27001 Certification... In 2021, we extended that commitment by achieving the SOC 2 Type 2.
— notion.com
SOC 2 compliance is outlined in Notion's published security documentation.
— notion.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The public API has a strict rate limit of roughly 3 requests per second, causing bottlenecks for data-heavy integrations.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Microsoft Teams Wiki is an excellent Internal Wiki Tool for small teams, providing a space for team collaboration and knowledge sharing. It creates an environment where ideas and project details can be easily accessed, updated, and shared, ensuring every team member is on the same page.
Microsoft Teams Wiki is an excellent Internal Wiki Tool for small teams, providing a space for team collaboration and knowledge sharing. It creates an environment where ideas and project details can be easily accessed, updated, and shared, ensuring every team member is on the same page.
Best for teams that are
Existing users who need to export legacy content before full removal
Skip if
Any team looking for a new solution as the product is retired as of Jan 2024
Users needing robust features like search, versioning, or permissions
Teams expecting a standalone knowledge base application
Expert Take
Our analysis shows that while Microsoft Teams Wiki was a convenient, lightweight tool for quick collaboration, its value is now historical due to its official retirement in January 2024. Research indicates that its primary strength lay in its seamless integration with Teams channels and the security inheritance from SharePoint. However, based on documented limitations such as the lack of searchability and version history, the transition to OneNote offers a more robust, albeit more complex, solution for enterprise knowledge management.
Pros
Included free with Microsoft 365
Simple lightweight interface
Native Teams channel integration
Real-time co-authoring capability
Enterprise-grade security via SharePoint
Cons
Retired/Deprecated as of Jan 2024
No search functionality in Teams
No version history or restore
Manual migration for private channels
Limited formatting options
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.1/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Internal Wiki Tools for Small Teams. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
7.2
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the feature set, editing capabilities, and functional completeness relative to modern knowledge management standards.
What We Found
Microsoft Teams Wiki provided basic rich-text editing and section-based organization but lacked critical features like search, version history, and recycle bin recovery before being officially retired in January 2024.
Score Rationale
The score is significantly below 8.0 because the product has been officially deprecated and replaced by OneNote, rendering it functionally obsolete for new workflows.
Supporting Evidence
Unlike OneNote, the Teams Wiki did not offer version history or the ability to restore deleted pages. It didn't offer a version history and didn't allow users to restore deleted pages.
— nuclino.com
The Wiki feature lacked a proper search function, preventing users from finding Wiki content via the Microsoft Teams search bar. It lacked a proper search feature, not allowing users to search their Wiki content from Microsoft Teams.
— nuclino.com
Microsoft announced that Wikis would be retired from Teams starting January 2024, with OneNote replacing the functionality. We are announcing that Wiki's will be retired from Teams starting January 2024.
— techcommunity.microsoft.com
Features real-time collaboration and version history, enhancing team productivity and knowledge management.
— support.microsoft.com
Integrated with Microsoft Teams, allowing for seamless collaboration and information sharing as documented in the official Microsoft support page.
— support.microsoft.com
9.2
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the vendor's stability, market presence, and the reliability of their long-term support commitments.
What We Found
As a core component of the Microsoft 365 suite, the product benefits from immense market trust and enterprise-grade backing, despite the negative reception regarding its deprecation.
Score Rationale
The score remains high due to Microsoft's dominant market position and the secure, albeit forced, transition path provided to OneNote.
Supporting Evidence
Microsoft provided a migration path to OneNote, a mature and supported product, ensuring data continuity for standard channels. We are offering note taking capabilities within Teams channels using the included OneNote notebook provided for each team.
— techcommunity.microsoft.com
Microsoft Teams is a widely used collaboration platform with over 300 million monthly active users as of 2023. 300 million monthly
— en.wikipedia.org
Microsoft Teams has been recognized in various industry reports for its collaboration capabilities.
— gartner.com
Part of the Microsoft 365 suite, a widely recognized and trusted productivity platform.
— microsoft.com
8.5
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We examine the ease of use, interface design, and the smoothness of workflows like content migration.
What We Found
The Wiki was praised for its simplicity and lightweight nature, but the migration experience to OneNote is manual for private channels and can result in formatting loss.
Score Rationale
The score is anchored at 8.5 due to the intuitive interface of the original tool, offset by the friction and limitations encountered during the mandatory migration process.
Supporting Evidence
Users exporting content may experience formatting changes, and dark mode is not supported in the exported notes. Post export users may see some formatting change and dark mode is not supported.
— techcommunity.microsoft.com
Exporting Wiki content to OneNote is not supported for private channels, requiring users to manually copy and move content. Export is only supported from standard channels, from Private channels user need to manually copy & move content.
— techcommunity.microsoft.com
User-friendly interface that integrates with existing Microsoft tools, enhancing user experience.
— support.microsoft.com
9.4
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We analyze the cost-to-value ratio, licensing transparency, and inclusion in broader software suites.
What We Found
The feature was included at no additional cost within all Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365 subscriptions, offering high value for basic documentation needs.
Score Rationale
This category scores highly because the tool was a free, integrated value-add for existing Microsoft 365 subscribers without hidden fees.
Supporting Evidence
The Wiki feature was available in the free version of Teams released in 2018. A free version of Teams was released on July 12, 2018, offering most core features at no cost
— en.wikipedia.org
Microsoft Teams Essentials is priced at $4.00 per user/month, with the Wiki feature included as a core capability. Teams Essentials is $4 per user per month
— youtube.com
Included with Microsoft 365 subscription, providing value through bundled services.
— microsoft.com
8.8
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We look for seamless interoperability with other tools and the ability to fit into a larger software ecosystem.
What We Found
While natively integrated into Teams channels, the Wiki was isolated from the broader Microsoft ecosystem (e.g., Microsoft Search, Outlook) compared to its replacement, OneNote.
Score Rationale
The score is strong due to channel integration but limited by the tool's isolation from the wider Microsoft 365 search and automation fabric.
Supporting Evidence
Wiki content was not searchable via the main Teams command box, which only searched messages, people, and files. if you search the command box at the top... that only searches messages. people and files. and seems to miss out anything in any of the wikis.
— youtube.com
The Wiki tab was a default component for each channel, allowing for immediate collaborative editing without external apps. Teams has a default wiki component for each channel.
— nuclino.com
Seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft 365 applications, enhancing workflow efficiency.
— support.microsoft.com
9.3
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We evaluate data encryption, residency controls, and adherence to enterprise compliance standards.
What We Found
Wiki data is stored in SharePoint, inheriting Microsoft 365's robust security measures including encryption at rest, TLS for transit, and eDiscovery capabilities.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the enterprise-grade security infrastructure of the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, which protects all Teams data including Wiki content.
Supporting Evidence
Data in Teams is encrypted in transit and at rest using industry-standard technologies like TLS and SRTP. Teams data is encrypted in transit and at rest in Microsoft services
— learn.microsoft.com
Teams Wiki content is stored within the team SharePoint site, benefiting from SharePoint's encryption and compliance features. You can also use the Wiki tab for note taking, and that content is also stored within the team SharePoint site.
— learn.microsoft.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Migration to OneNote is not supported for Private Channels, requiring a manual copy-paste process for users.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
The methodology for evaluating internal wiki tools for small teams focused on several key factors, including features, ease of use, integration capabilities, and customer feedback. Specific considerations important to this category included collaboration features, customization options, scalability for small teams, and overall user experience, as these aspects directly impact the effectiveness of knowledge sharing within smaller groups. The research and analysis approach involved a comprehensive comparison of product specifications, detailed examination of customer reviews and ratings, and an assessment of the price-to-value ratio, ensuring that the rankings reflect both performance and user satisfaction based on available data.
Overall scores reflect relative ranking within this category, accounting for which limitations materially affect real-world use cases. Small differences in category scores can result in larger ranking separation when those differences affect the most common or highest-impact workflows.
Verification
Products evaluated through comprehensive research and analysis of collaborative features and user feedback.
Rankings based on a thorough evaluation of user reviews, expert opinions, and functionality.
Selection criteria focus on usability, integration capabilities, and team collaboration effectiveness.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We may also earn commissions from other affiliate partners.
×
Score Breakdown
0.0/ 10
Deep Research
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. By continuing to use our website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Learn more
