Assessing the Landscape: A Research-Based Look at Vulnerability Scanning and Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies When analyzing customer feedback across multiple platforms, it becomes clear that not all vulnerability scanning and pen testing tools are created equal. Market research indicates that tools like Qualys and Rapid7 frequently appear in top-rated lists, often praised for their robust scanning capabilities and user-friendly interfaces. However, many reviews indicate that customers sometimes overthink the complexity of these tools, while in reality, the ease of integration and real-time reporting features are what truly matter for SaaS companies. For instance, users have reported that Qualys’s continuous monitoring feature may help identify vulnerabilities before they escalate, while Rapid7’s Insight platform is commonly associated with streamlined workflows that can suit various team sizes. Interestingly, industry reports show that organizations that prioritize user experience in their cybersecurity tools often see better adoption rates among their teams. But what about budget-friendly options?Assessing the Landscape: A Research-Based Look at Vulnerability Scanning and Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies When analyzing customer feedback across multiple platforms, it becomes clear that not all vulnerability scanning and pen testing tools are created equal.Assessing the Landscape: A Research-Based Look at Vulnerability Scanning and Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies When analyzing customer feedback across multiple platforms, it becomes clear that not all vulnerability scanning and pen testing tools are created equal. Market research indicates that tools like Qualys and Rapid7 frequently appear in top-rated lists, often praised for their robust scanning capabilities and user-friendly interfaces. However, many reviews indicate that customers sometimes overthink the complexity of these tools, while in reality, the ease of integration and real-time reporting features are what truly matter for SaaS companies. For instance, users have reported that Qualys’s continuous monitoring feature may help identify vulnerabilities before they escalate, while Rapid7’s Insight platform is commonly associated with streamlined workflows that can suit various team sizes. Interestingly, industry reports show that organizations that prioritize user experience in their cybersecurity tools often see better adoption rates among their teams. But what about budget-friendly options? Many reviews suggest that tools like OpenVAS offer a solid foundation for those just starting, proving that effective security doesn’t always require breaking the bank. And let’s not forget the historical context: Rapid7, founded in 2000, originally made its mark with open-source tools, which may explain its strong community support today. So, what’s the takeaway? When it comes to vulnerability scanning tools, it’s essential to focus on your specific needs rather than getting lost in a sea of features. After all, no one wants to spend more time managing their security tools than they do actually securing their business—right?
Pentera is a robust SaaS solution designed for SaaS companies to automate penetration testing and attack surface validation across all environments - cloud, hybrid, and on-prem. Its features are tailored to support Continuous Automated Red Teaming (CTEM) and significantly reduce cyber exposure, addressing the unique security needs of the SaaS industry.
Pentera is a robust SaaS solution designed for SaaS companies to automate penetration testing and attack surface validation across all environments - cloud, hybrid, and on-prem. Its features are tailored to support Continuous Automated Red Teaming (CTEM) and significantly reduce cyber exposure, addressing the unique security needs of the SaaS industry.
AUTOMATED PEN TESTING
ADVANCED REPORTING
Best for teams that are
Large enterprises requiring continuous, automated security validation.
Organizations with security budgets over $35k/year for advanced testing.
Security teams needing to validate ransomware defenses and internal networks.
Skip if
Small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) with limited security budgets.
Teams seeking a purely manual, human-led penetration testing service.
Organizations looking for a simple, low-cost compliance scanner.
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Pentera stands out by shifting the paradigm from theoretical simulation to actual validation. Unlike traditional tools that merely guess at vulnerabilities, Pentera safely executes real exploits in production environments to prove risk without disrupting business continuity. Research indicates it is the first in its niche to achieve ISO 42001 certification, demonstrating a commitment to safe AI usage. Its ability to emulate full ransomware kill-chains provides critical, evidence-based insights that manual testing cannot match in frequency or scale.
Pros
Safe-by-design automated production testing
First ISO 42001 certified AEV vendor
Validates ransomware resilience with real emulation
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.8/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Vulnerability Scanning & Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.5
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the software's ability to automate complex security testing, including kill-chain execution and ransomware emulation, without disrupting production environments.
What We Found
Pentera provides an agentless Automated Security Validation platform that safely emulates full kill-chain attacks, including ransomware and credential theft, in live production environments. It moves beyond simulation to actual validation by attempting safe exploits to prove vulnerability.
Score Rationale
The product scores exceptionally high due to its unique 'safe-by-design' capability to run real exploits in production and its comprehensive modules like RansomwareReady and Credential Exposure.
Supporting Evidence
It operates with an agentless architecture requiring no installation on endpoints. Pentera's portfolio currently consists of three main products... all of which operate in an agentless and automated manner.
— omdia.tech.informa.com
The platform includes specialized modules for RansomwareReady testing and Credential Exposure to validate resilience against specific threats. Core capabilities include... RansomwareReady (validates resilience against ransomware strains), and Credentials Exposure.
— securitystack.app
Pentera autonomously emulates the entire cyberattack kill chain, from external-facing assets all the way to the core of the enterprise. Pentera autonomously emulates the entire cyberattack kill chain... thus revealing the most risk-bearing security gaps.
— helpnetsecurity.com
Documented in official product documentation, Pentera automates penetration testing across cloud, hybrid, and on-prem environments.
— pentera.io
9.6
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the vendor's financial stability, market valuation, customer base size, and industry recognition.
What We Found
Pentera is a unicorn with a valuation over $1 billion, backed by top-tier investors like Evolution Equity Partners and Insight Partners. It serves over 1,100 enterprise customers globally and recently raised a $60M Series D round in 2025.
Score Rationale
With unicorn status, a massive recent funding round, and a rapidly growing customer base of top-tier enterprises, Pentera demonstrates market leadership and high stability.
Supporting Evidence
Pentera achieved unicorn status in 2022 with a valuation of $1 billion. Pentera is now a software unicorn -- having achieved a $1 billion valuation as a privately held business.
— msspalert.com
The company has over 1,100 customers including major brands like Blackstone and El Al Airlines. The company now serves over 1,100 customers, including the Blackstone investment fund... El Al Airlines, and the Wyndham hotel chain.
— calcalistech.com
Pentera raised a $60 million Series D in March 2025, bringing total funding to $250 million. Pentera... today announced a $60 million Series D funding round... bringing the company's total funding to $250 million.
— prnewswire.com
8.9
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We look for ease of deployment, user interface intuitiveness, and the level of automation that reduces manual workload.
What We Found
Users consistently praise the platform's ease of use, quick setup, and fully automated nature. However, some users note that reporting dashboards can lack the necessary detail for enterprise-scale views or specific executive summaries.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to the 'one-click' automation and ease of use, but slightly impacted by documented user feedback regarding reporting limitations and dashboard granularity.
Supporting Evidence
Some users find the reporting inadequate for enterprise-scale applications. Users find the reporting inadequate in Pentera, lacking detail and effectiveness for enterprise-scale applications.
— g2.com
The platform allows IT professionals to run tests with minimal setup via an Autonomous Attack Orchestrator. The platform allows any IT professional to run penetration tests with minimal setup.
— helpnetsecurity.com
Users highlight the ease of use and quick deployment as key advantages. Users highlight the ease of use of Pentera, enabling quick deployment and efficient cybersecurity management tasks.
— g2.com
May require technical expertise to fully utilize, as outlined in product documentation.
— pentera.io
8.2
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate pricing models, transparency of costs, and perceived return on investment compared to manual alternatives.
What We Found
Pentera uses a quote-based annual subscription model. While it offers significant ROI by replacing manual pentesting, it is perceived as expensive (avg $120k/yr) and potentially cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the high value of replacing manual services, balanced against the lack of public pricing transparency and high entry cost that excludes smaller businesses.
Supporting Evidence
Users note that while expensive, it saves money compared to manual penetration testing. The time it saves versus the manual way. We were able run more scan and spend less.
— g2.com
Starting pricing is reported around $35,000 annually. Pentera pricing starts at $35,000 (Annually, Quote-Based).
— selecthub.com
Pricing is subscription-based and can average around $120,000 per year for full features. The annual cost for all features is approximately 120,000 US dollars per year.
— peerspot.com
Category 5: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We examine the product's certifications, adherence to safety standards in testing, and compliance capabilities.
What We Found
Pentera is the first in its category to achieve ISO 42001 certification for AI safety. It is also SOC 2 compliant and ISO 27001 certified. Its 'safe-by-design' architecture ensures production testing does not cause downtime.
Score Rationale
Achieving ISO 42001 first in the market, combined with standard SOC 2/ISO 27001 certifications and a proven safety record in production, merits a near-perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
The platform helps validate compliance with frameworks like GDPR, PCI DSS, and HIPAA. Pentera simplifies compliance by validating your organization's adherence to security frameworks and regulations such as GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001.
— cybersecurity.aw
Pentera is the first Adversarial Exposure Validation vendor to achieve ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certification for AI management. Pentera is the first Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV) vendor to meet this rigorous compliance benchmark.
— prnewswire.com
Outlined in published security policies, Pentera reduces cyber exposure through automated testing.
— pentera.io
8.8
Category 6: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We look for the breadth of integrations with SIEM, SOAR, and ticketing systems to fit into existing security workflows.
What We Found
Pentera integrates with major security tools including Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, ServiceNow, Splunk, and Microsoft Sentinel. It offers an API for custom workflows, though some users desire broader 'appliance' integrations.
Score Rationale
Strong integrations with market leaders (Palo Alto, ServiceNow) and a functional API support a high score, though the ecosystem is focused primarily on enterprise security stacks.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports automated playbooks through Cortex XSOAR to remediate vulnerabilities. With the Cortex XSOAR-PenTera integration, PenTera can continuously validate the effectiveness of enterprise passwords and take action.
— xsoar.pan.dev
Pentera integrates with ServiceNow, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, and major SIEMs. Below is a list of products that Pentera currently integrates with: 1. ServiceNow... Vectra AI... Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus.
— slashdot.org
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Some users report high system resource utilization during scans, which can impact performance.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Intruder.io is an automated vulnerability scanner specifically designed for SaaS companies to fortify their digital infrastructure. It delivers cybersecurity solutions by identifying weaknesses that could result in costly data breaches, thus enhancing the security protocols of SaaS businesses.
Intruder.io is an automated vulnerability scanner specifically designed for SaaS companies to fortify their digital infrastructure. It delivers cybersecurity solutions by identifying weaknesses that could result in costly data breaches, thus enhancing the security protocols of SaaS businesses.
CLOUD ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT
USER-FRIENDLY INTERFACE
Best for teams that are
Startups and cloud-native companies needing effortless, continuous scanning.
Lean IT teams with limited security expertise requiring clear reports.
Businesses needing quick compliance checks (SOC2, ISO 27001) with minimal setup.
Skip if
Large enterprises with complex, legacy on-premise infrastructure.
Security teams requiring deep manual testing for business logic flaws.
Our analysis shows Intruder.io stands out by successfully bridging the gap between enterprise-grade scanning power and user-friendly design. Research indicates their multi-engine approach (combining Tenable, Nuclei, and OpenVAS) provides superior coverage compared to single-engine tools. We particularly value the documented integrations with Drata and Vanta, which automate the tedious evidence-collection process for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance.
Pros
Combines Tenable, OpenVAS, and Nuclei engines
Automated compliance evidence for Drata/Vanta
Extremely intuitive and easy-to-use interface
Continuous emerging threat monitoring
Transparent pricing with monthly options
Cons
Licenses locked for 30 days per target
Can be expensive for small implementations
Reporting customization is somewhat limited
Manual penetration testing is an extra cost
Occasional false positives from automated scans
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.7/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Vulnerability Scanning & Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.9
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of vulnerability detection, scanning engine quality, and automation capabilities for continuous security monitoring.
What We Found
Intruder combines multiple scanning engines (Tenable Nessus, OpenVAS, Nuclei, ZAP) to provide comprehensive coverage across infrastructure, web apps, and APIs, featuring continuous emerging threat monitoring.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to the robust multi-engine approach and continuous monitoring capabilities, though it stops short of a perfect score as deep manual penetration testing is a separate add-on service.
Supporting Evidence
The product supports authenticated web application scanning and API schema scanning to detect deeper vulnerabilities. Yes, you can carry out authenticated web application scans using Intruder. This includes checks for modern web apps, APIs, and single page applications (SPAs)
— intruder.io
Intruder performs over 140,000 security checks, including emerging threat scans that automatically check systems when new vulnerabilities are disclosed. 140k+ checks · Risk Based Prioritization... Emerging Threat Detection. Check and act fast
— intruder.io
The platform utilizes a hybrid scanning engine approach, incorporating Tenable Nessus, OpenVAS, and Nuclei for infrastructure, and ZAP for web applications. Intruder's Cloud and Enterprise plans include the Nuclei scanning engine to further complement our suite of scanning engines (Tenable Nessus, OpenVAS, ZAP, Nmap)
— intruder.io
Continuous monitoring and comprehensive reporting features outlined in product documentation.
— intruder.io
Automated vulnerability scanning specifically designed for SaaS companies, documented on the official website.
— intruder.io
9.2
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the vendor's industry reputation, customer base size, security certifications, and third-party validation.
What We Found
Intruder is SOC 2 Type 2 certified, serves over 3,000 customers, and holds high ratings on major review platforms like G2.
Score Rationale
The product demonstrates exceptional market trust through its own SOC 2 certification, a large verified customer base, and consistently high user review scores.
Supporting Evidence
Intruder maintains a high satisfaction rating on G2, with a score of 4.8 out of 5. G2 logo. 4.8 out of 5.
— intruder.io
The company serves a significant user base of over 3,000 companies. Intruder helps 3,000+ customers focus on fixing what matters.
— gartner.com
Intruder has achieved SOC 2 Type 2 certification for its own platform security. We're proud to say that we're SOC 2 Type 2 certified – with a little help from our own vulnerability scanner.
— intruder.io
9.5
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze the ease of setup, interface intuitiveness, and quality of customer support resources.
What We Found
The platform is widely celebrated for its 'clean and intuitive' interface and ease of setup, making it highly accessible for lean teams without dedicated security staff.
Score Rationale
This category receives a near-perfect score because user reviews consistently highlight usability as a primary differentiator compared to complex enterprise alternatives.
Supporting Evidence
The platform is designed to be 'effortless' for lean teams, automating complex tasks. Audit-ready effortless reporting. Comfortably pass SOC 2 standards with high-quality reports that are both comprehensive and easy on the eye.
— intruder.io
Users consistently praise the UI for being intuitive and easy to set up without needing extensive documentation. The UI is clean and intuitive. I didn't need to dig through documentation to figure out where things were.
— g2.com
User-friendly interface and integration with popular tools like Slack and Jira, as documented on the official site.
— intruder.io
8.4
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We examine pricing transparency, contract flexibility, and the balance of features versus cost.
What We Found
Pricing is transparently published on their website, but the 30-day license lock-in policy and per-target costs can be restrictive for dynamic environments.
Score Rationale
While transparency is excellent, the score is impacted by the strict 30-day license lock-in policy which limits flexibility for users with ephemeral assets.
Supporting Evidence
Licenses are locked to a specific target for 30 days once scanned, preventing immediate reuse on different assets. Licenses are locked for 30 days from the last scan in order to ensure fair usage of the platform.
— help.intruder.io
Pricing is publicly listed: Essential starts at $149/mo, Cloud at $299/mo, and Pro at $499/mo. Essential... Starting from $149 / month... Cloud... Starting from $299 / month... Pro... Starting from $499 / month
— intruder.io
We assess the breadth of integrations with cloud providers, ticketing systems, and communication tools.
What We Found
The platform offers robust integrations with major cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP), ticketing systems (Jira, GitHub), and notification channels (Slack, Teams).
Score Rationale
Extensive native integrations cover the entire DevSecOps lifecycle, from asset discovery to issue ticketing, ensuring a high score.
Supporting Evidence
The platform integrates with popular issue tracking and notification tools like Jira, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. Slack integration... Microsoft Teams integration... Atlassian Jira integration... GitHub integration
— help.intruder.io
Intruder syncs targets from major cloud providers including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Automatically include any internet exposed AWS systems as Intruder targets... Azure... Google Cloud
— intruder.io
9.3
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We evaluate features that specifically assist with regulatory compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001) and audit readiness.
What We Found
Intruder excels in compliance automation, offering direct integrations with Vanta and Drata to automatically push scan evidence for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 audits.
Score Rationale
The seamless integration with major compliance platforms (Drata/Vanta) significantly reduces manual workload, justifying a top-tier score.
Supporting Evidence
Reports are designed to satisfy auditors for standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA. Drata is a proud partner with Intruder as a tool of choice helping hundreds of companies automate their continuous SOC2 and ISO 27001 compliance.
— intruder.io
Intruder integrates directly with Drata and Vanta to automate the collection of vulnerability management evidence. Our Vanta integration enables you to send evidence of vulnerability scanning directly from the Intruder platform, in just one-click
— intruder.io
SOC 2 compliance outlined in published security documentation.
— intruder.io
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Reporting customization is noted as limited by some users, specifically regarding branded reporting or granular control over report generation.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Edgescan's PTaaS is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution for SaaS companies, combining both vulnerability scanning and penetration testing. It provides continuous visibility, detecting security issues in real-time, and offers guided remediation, making it an ideal choice for SaaS businesses seeking to maintain robust security.
Edgescan's PTaaS is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution for SaaS companies, combining both vulnerability scanning and penetration testing. It provides continuous visibility, detecting security issues in real-time, and offers guided remediation, making it an ideal choice for SaaS businesses seeking to maintain robust security.
REAL-TIME DETECTION
GUIDED REMEDIATION
Best for teams that are
Enterprises requiring verified results with zero false positives via human analysts.
Teams needing full-stack coverage (Web, API, Network, Cloud) in one platform.
Organizations needing compliance-ready reports (PCI-DSS, ISO 27001).
Skip if
Users seeking a low-cost, fully automated scanner without human service.
Teams that prefer managing their own ad-hoc scans without external reliance.
Small businesses looking for instant, self-service scan results.
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Edgescan solves the primary pain point of automated security testing: alert fatigue. By guaranteeing human validation of every finding, they deliver a 'false-positive-free' experience that allows security teams to focus immediately on remediation rather than triage. Research indicates their hybrid model—combining continuous automated scanning with on-demand CREST-certified expertise—provides a unique balance of speed and depth that purely automated DAST tools cannot match.
Pros
100% false-positive-free guarantee via human validation
Unlimited retesting included in subscription
CREST and ISO 27001 certified service
Full-stack coverage (Web, API, Network, Mobile)
Integrates with Jira, ServiceNow, and CI/CD pipelines
Cons
User interface described as dated by some users
Scans take longer due to manual validation
Reporting depth may lag behind Burp Suite
No public pricing (requires quote)
Filtering system can be difficult to customize
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.6/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Vulnerability Scanning & Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.0
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of testing coverage (web, API, network), the depth of vulnerability detection, and the integration of automation with human expertise.
What We Found
Edgescan delivers a 'hybrid' solution combining continuous automated scanning with manual validation by CREST-certified experts to ensure accuracy across the full stack (Web, API, Network, Mobile).
Score Rationale
The score is high due to the unique hybrid model and full-stack coverage, though slightly limited by user reports of slower scan completion times compared to fully automated tools.
Supporting Evidence
The platform covers the entire security lifecycle including initial discovery, prioritization, and remediation across networks, APIs, and web applications. Edgescan offers unified testing capabilities across networks, APIs, web applications, and mobile applications
— g2.com
Edgescan PTaaS is a hybrid solution combining automation, AI, analytics, and human expertise to enhance risk management. Edgescan PTaaS is a hybrid solution combining automation, AI, analytics, and human expertise... delivered via the Edgescan Platform.
— expertinsights.com
Offers continuous visibility and real-time detection of security issues, enhancing proactive threat management.
— edgescan.com
Combines vulnerability scanning and penetration testing for comprehensive security coverage, as documented on the official product page.
— edgescan.com
9.3
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for industry certifications, years in business, adoption by major enterprises, and third-party validations like Gartner or G2.
What We Found
Founded in 2011, Edgescan holds top-tier certifications including CREST, ISO 27001, and PCI ASV, and maintains a high 4.7/5 rating on Gartner Peer Insights.
Score Rationale
The presence of the rigorous CREST accreditation and long-standing market presence since 2011 justifies a near-perfect score for credibility.
Supporting Evidence
The company is a PCI Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV) authorized to conduct external vulnerability scans. As a PCI Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV), Edgescan is authorized by the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council
— kb.edgescan.com
Edgescan is ISO 27001 certified and a CREST Member company, a significant marker of quality in the penetration testing industry. BCC Risk Advisory/edgescan is now the only ISO27001 & CREST Certified Pen Testing Platform available on the market doing what we do.
— edgescan.com
8.6
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess the intuitiveness of the dashboard, quality of customer support, and ease of interpreting reports and findings.
What We Found
Users consistently praise the 'outstanding' support and responsiveness, though some reviews note the UI can be 'dated' or less intuitive than competitors.
Score Rationale
While customer support is world-class, the score is impacted by consistent user feedback regarding the user interface being less intuitive than modern alternatives.
Supporting Evidence
Some users find the UI less intuitive compared to other tools in the market. The UI is not as much intuitive as other tools. - Sometimes it's difficult to find the setting you want to change.
— aws.amazon.com
Users describe customer support as outstanding and responsive, often replying within the same day. Edgescan's customer support is outstanding. The team is incredibly responsive — often getting back to us within the same day
— g2.com
Provides guided remediation support to simplify the process of fixing vulnerabilities, as outlined on the official website.
— edgescan.com
8.8
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate pricing models, hidden costs, and the inclusion of critical features like retesting and support.
What We Found
Edgescan offers a subscription model that includes unlimited retesting—a significant value-add over traditional pay-per-test models—though specific pricing is not public.
Score Rationale
The inclusion of unlimited retesting and continuous monitoring in the license fee provides exceptional value, offsetting the lack of public pricing transparency.
Supporting Evidence
Pricing scales with environment size rather than flat rates, ensuring organizations pay for what they need. Edgescan offers flexible packaging that scales with your environment and security maturity.
— g2.com
The service includes unlimited automated vulnerability assessments and retesting of findings. delivering results with unlimited retesting, contextual risk scoring via traditional and Edgescan's Validated Security Score
— expertinsights.com
Pricing is customized and available upon request, limiting upfront cost visibility.
— edgescan.com
9.6
Category 5: Accuracy & False Positive Management
What We Looked For
We examine the product's ability to filter noise, specifically looking for guarantees regarding false positives and validation processes.
What We Found
Edgescan differentiates itself with a '100% false-positive-free' guarantee, achieved by having human analysts manually validate every automated finding before reporting.
Score Rationale
This is the product's strongest selling point; the documented guarantee of human validation for every finding merits a near-perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
Approximately 8% of discovered vulnerabilities require manual inspection, which Edgescan experts handle to ensure accuracy. Our approach has resulted in near false positive-free vulnerability intelligence with approximately only 8% of discovered vulnerabilities requiring manual inspection
— edgescan.com
Edgescan guarantees 100% false-positive-free validated vulnerability intelligence. Edgescan's continuous testing platform strengthens your CTEM program with 100% false-positive-free, validated vulnerability intelligence
— edgescan.com
Integrates with popular tools, enhancing its adaptability within existing tech stacks.
— edgescan.com
9.4
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We check for adherence to major security standards (PCI, ISO) and the ability to support client compliance reporting.
What We Found
The platform is fully certified for PCI ASV scanning and ISO 27001, and supports compliance reporting for standards like SOC 2 and HIPAA.
Score Rationale
With both ISO 27001 certification for the company and PCI ASV status for the product, it meets the highest standards for compliance-focused buyers.
Supporting Evidence
The service helps organizations maintain compliance with industry regulations through continuous assessment. Manual penetration testing is essential for maintaining compliance with industry regulations and security frameworks
— edgescan.com
Edgescan is a PCI SSC Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV) and is ISO 27001 certified. The Edgescan solution has been fully approved for PCI ASV scanning across all geographies, and Edgescan is ISO27001-certified
— edgescan.com
Supports compliance readiness, crucial for SaaS companies in regulated industries.
— edgescan.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Some users feel the reporting capabilities, while strong, lack the depth found in specialized tools like Burp Suite.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Invicti’s Automated Penetration Testing Software is a powerful tool for SaaS companies. It allows for comprehensive scanning of web assets for security vulnerabilities, ensuring robust security measures and compliance for SaaS applications. The software's automation capabilities significantly reduce the time and resources required for extensive pen testing.
Invicti’s Automated Penetration Testing Software is a powerful tool for SaaS companies. It allows for comprehensive scanning of web assets for security vulnerabilities, ensuring robust security measures and compliance for SaaS applications. The software's automation capabilities significantly reduce the time and resources required for extensive pen testing.
CONTINUOUS MONITORING
COMPLIANCE READY
Best for teams that are
Enterprises managing hundreds or thousands of web assets and APIs.
AppSec teams needing automated verification to reduce false positives.
Organizations requiring deep DAST capabilities integrated into CI/CD.
Skip if
Small businesses or individuals with a single website to scan.
Teams looking for a lightweight, low-cost scanner without enterprise features.
Organizations primarily seeking static code analysis (SAST) as a standalone tool.
Expert Take
Our analysis shows that Invicti stands out primarily for its Proof-Based Scanning™ technology, which research indicates can verify 94% of direct-impact vulnerabilities with 99.98% accuracy. This feature significantly reduces the manual triage burden common in DAST tools. Additionally, the platform's ability to unify DAST, IAST, and SCA into a single scan provides a comprehensive view of risk that is well-suited for enterprise DevSecOps environments.
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.5/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Vulnerability Scanning & Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.3
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of security testing features, including DAST, IAST, SCA, and API scanning capabilities.
What We Found
Invicti offers a comprehensive platform combining DAST, IAST, and SCA to detect vulnerabilities across web applications, APIs (REST, SOAP, GraphQL), and open-source components.
Score Rationale
The product scores highly due to its unified approach to DAST, IAST, and SCA, though some users report performance lags during deep scans.
Supporting Evidence
Invicti SCA works in tandem with DAST and IAST testing solutions within a single scan. Invicti SCA (software composition analysis), which works in tandem with our dynamic and interactive (DAST + IAST) testing solutions within one single scan.
— invicti.com
The platform unifies DAST, API security, SCA, and ASPM to help teams secure their attack surface. The Invicti Application Security Platform unifies DAST, API security, SCA, and ASPM to help teams focus on what matters most
— prnewswire.com
The software's automation capabilities significantly reduce the time and resources required for extensive pen testing.
— invicti.com
Documented in official product documentation, Invicti offers comprehensive scanning of web assets for security vulnerabilities.
— invicti.com
9.1
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for industry recognition, analyst reports, customer base size, and established market presence.
What We Found
Invicti is a recognized market leader, positioned as a Challenger in the Gartner Magic Quadrant and serving over 3,500 customers globally.
Score Rationale
The score reflects strong industry validation from Gartner and a large enterprise customer base, establishing it as a trusted tier-1 vendor.
Supporting Evidence
The company serves more than 3,500 organizations worldwide. More than 3,500 customers around the world trust Invicti to secure their web applications
— invicti.com
Invicti was named a Challenger in the 2022 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing. Invicti Security™ today announced the company has been named a Challenger in the 2022 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing.
— invicti.com
8.5
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess user interface design, ease of setup, support quality, and workflow efficiency.
What We Found
While users praise the interface and ease of use, there are documented complaints regarding slow technical support response times and scanning speeds.
Score Rationale
The score is impacted by consistent user feedback regarding disappointing technical support experiences and slower scan performance compared to peers.
Supporting Evidence
Some users report disappointing technical support that struggles to provide real solutions. The technical support is quite disappointing. After connecting with them... most of the time they are unable to provide any real solution.
— g2.com
Users value the ease of use and user-friendly interface for facilitating accurate tests. Users value the ease of use of Invicti, facilitating accurate tests and seamless integration into workflows.
— g2.com
May require technical expertise to fully utilize, as noted in product documentation.
— invicti.com
8.1
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate pricing transparency, cost-to-value ratio, and flexibility of licensing models.
What We Found
Pricing is not public and is considered high for smaller organizations, with costs estimated between $4,000 and $73,000 annually depending on scale.
Score Rationale
The score is lower due to the lack of public pricing transparency and feedback citing high costs that may be prohibitive for non-enterprise teams.
Supporting Evidence
Average annual cost is approximately $25,000, with maximums reaching around $73,000. Our data reveals that the average cost for Invicti Security Corp software is about $25,000 annually.
— vendr.com
Invicti pricing is not publicly listed and available only through quotes, with entry-level packages starting around $7,000. Invicti pricing is not publicly listed and is available only through quotes... Entry-level pricing starts at around $7,000 per year
— beaglesecurity.com
We analyze the technology used to verify vulnerabilities and reduce false positives.
What We Found
Invicti's proprietary Proof-Based Scanning technology automatically verifies 94% of direct-impact vulnerabilities with 99.98% accuracy.
Score Rationale
This category receives a near-perfect score because the Proof-Based Scanning technology fundamentally solves the industry-wide problem of false positives.
Supporting Evidence
The scanner safely exploits identified vulnerabilities to present proof, eliminating manual verification. Invicti scanner is the only online web application security scanner that automatically exploits identified vulnerabilities in a read-only and safe way to confirm identified issues.
— docs.invicti.com
Proof-Based Scanning technology confirms 94% of direct-impact vulnerabilities with 99.98% accuracy. Netsparker's Proof-Based Scanning technology automatically confirmed 94% of direct-impact vulnerabilities with a confirmation accuracy of 99.98%.
— prnewswire.com
Outlined in published security documentation, Invicti ensures robust security measures and compliance for SaaS applications.
— invicti.com
9.0
Category 6: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We examine the breadth of native integrations with CI/CD pipelines, issue trackers, and collaboration tools.
What We Found
The platform offers over 50 integrations, including native support for Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab, Jira, and Azure DevOps to automate security workflows.
Score Rationale
The score reflects a robust ecosystem that fits seamlessly into modern DevSecOps pipelines, supported by a wide range of out-of-the-box connectors.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports integrations with more than 50 DevSecOps tools. fully automated workflow through integrations with more than 50 DevSecOps tools.
— invicti.com
Invicti connects directly with Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jira, and Azure DevOps. Invicti connects directly with Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab, and other leading CI/CD tools. It also integrates with ticketing platforms like Jira and Azure DevOps
— invicti.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, Invicti supports integration with various CI/CD tools.
— invicti.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Users have noted slow scanning speeds, particularly when scanning large applications or API endpoints.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Qualysec's SaaS Penetration Testing is a robust tool designed specifically for SaaS companies to identify and rectify security vulnerabilities. It provides comprehensive penetration testing performed by a certified team to uncover potential security flaws, ensuring the safety and integrity of the SaaS platform.
Qualysec's SaaS Penetration Testing is a robust tool designed specifically for SaaS companies to identify and rectify security vulnerabilities. It provides comprehensive penetration testing performed by a certified team to uncover potential security flaws, ensuring the safety and integrity of the SaaS platform.
INTEGRATION READY
Best for teams that are
SaaS and Fintech companies requiring deep manual penetration testing.
Startups and SMEs needing expert remediation guidance and zero false positives.
Organizations needing to find complex business logic errors that scanners miss.
Skip if
Users looking for a fully automated, self-service vulnerability scanner tool.
Teams needing instant results without waiting for manual reports.
Organizations with zero budget for professional services or consulting.
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Qualysec stands out for its 'Zero False Positives' guarantee, achieved by strictly validating automated findings with manual ethical hacking. Research indicates this hybrid approach, combined with their transparent pricing model starting at $999, offers high value for SaaS startups needing robust security validation without enterprise costs. Based on documented features, the inclusion of a formal Letter of Attestation and video proofs of concepts makes it particularly effective for vendors needing to close sales deals with security-conscious buyers.
Pros
Zero false positives guarantee
Transparent pricing from $999
Includes Letter of Attestation
Hybrid manual & automated testing
Video POCs in reports
Cons
Limited G2 review volume
Liability limited to fees paid
No ITRAC rating measurement
Manual testing takes more time
Fewer enterprise integrations
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.3/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Vulnerability Scanning & Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.9
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
Comprehensive testing methodologies covering web, mobile, and cloud assets with adherence to industry standards like OWASP and NIST.
What We Found
Qualysec employs a hybrid methodology combining automated scanning with manual testing to cover Web, Mobile, API, and Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) assets. Their process follows OWASP, SANS, and NIST standards, ensuring coverage of business logic errors often missed by scanners.
Score Rationale
The product scores highly due to its comprehensive hybrid approach and adherence to major standards, though it lacks some advanced enterprise-grade automated continuous monitoring features found in larger platforms.
Supporting Evidence
Supports testing for Web Applications, Mobile Apps, APIs, IoT, and Cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, Azure). Security testing: Penetration testing Vulnerability Assessment Web Application Penetration Testing Mobile application Penetration testing Cloud Penetration Testing... IoT Penetration Testing
— g2.com
Utilizes a hybrid testing approach combining manual and automated techniques to detect complex business logic flaws. QualySec uses a balanced combination of manual and automated testing techniques... guarantees that both technical weaknesses and business logic flaws are discovered
— qualysec.com
Documented in official product documentation, Qualysec provides comprehensive penetration testing tailored for SaaS platforms.
— qualysec.com
8.7
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
Verifiable certifications, recognized awards, and a critical mass of third-party reviews validating the vendor's reputation.
What We Found
Qualysec is an ISO 27001 certified company and holds awards from bodies like DSCI and NASSCOM. While they have positive testimonials and high ratings on Clutch (5.0) and GoodFirms, they have a limited volume of reviews on major platforms like G2 compared to market leaders.
Score Rationale
The score is anchored by their ISO 27001 certification and strong client testimonials, but slightly limited by the low volume of verified reviews on G2 which restricts broader market validation.
Supporting Evidence
Maintains a 5.0 rating on Clutch with verified client reviews highlighting professionalism and timeliness. Qualysec Technologies Pvt Ltd offers competitive pricing under $10,000... Clients appreciate their value for cost, timely delivery, and effective communication
— clutch.co
Company is ISO 27001 certified, demonstrating commitment to information security standards. At Qualysec, our commitment to cybersecurity excellence shines through our several awards, like ISO 27001, DSCI, STPI, NASSCOM
— g2.com
8.9
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
Clear reporting, accessible support channels, and remediation guidance that helps developers fix issues efficiently.
What We Found
The service includes detailed PDF/DOC reports with video proofs of concepts (POCs) to assist developers. They offer remediation guidance, retesting to validate fixes, and support via Email, Slack, or Skype depending on the service package.
Score Rationale
The inclusion of video POCs and direct remediation support drives a high score, ensuring the technical findings are actionable for development teams.
Supporting Evidence
Offers post-assessment remediation guidance and retesting to ensure vulnerabilities are resolved. After identifying risks, we provided a clear report with practical steps their development team could take to fix each issue... Once fixes were implemented, we conducted a second round of testing
— qualysec.com
Provides detailed reports including video Proof of Concepts (POC) to help developers reproduce and fix issues. Deep penetration testing; OWASP and SANS methodology... PDF and DOC Report; Retest; Video POC; Consultation call.
— g2.com
Tailored solutions require technical understanding, as outlined in product documentation.
— qualysec.com
9.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
Transparent public pricing, competitive rates for the niche, and clear service deliverables without hidden costs.
What We Found
Qualysec offers exceptional transparency with public pricing starting at $999 for web apps. They provide clear tiered packages (Starter, Growth, Business, Enterprise) and a money-back guarantee if no value is added, which is rare in this industry.
Score Rationale
This category achieves a near-perfect score due to the rare transparency of publishing exact starting prices ($999) and offering a money-back guarantee, significantly reducing buyer risk.
Supporting Evidence
Offers a money-back guarantee if the client does not see value in the service. We believe in Client success is our success. If you do not see any value we add then we will happy to refund your money.
— g2.com
Publicly lists starting prices for penetration testing, such as $999 for web applications. Web app Penetration testing Price. $999.00. With One-Time Purchase. Mobile app Penetration Testing Price. $1,199.00.
— g2.com
Pricing is custom and based on platform complexity, limiting upfront cost visibility.
— qualysec.com
9.0
Category 5: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
Capabilities to support major compliance frameworks (SOC2, HIPAA, GDPR) and secure handling of client data.
What We Found
The service is explicitly designed to support compliance with SOC2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, and PCI-DSS. They provide a 'Letter of Attestation' upon completion, which is a critical asset for SaaS companies proving security to enterprise clients.
Score Rationale
The provision of a formal Letter of Attestation and specific alignment with major regulatory frameworks like SOC2 and HIPAA justifies the high score for compliance-focused buyers.
Supporting Evidence
Testing services are aligned with major compliance standards including SOC2, HIPAA, and GDPR. Our comprehensive penetration testing services help ensure your platform adheres to security regulations like SOC2, GDPR, and ISO 27001.
— qualysec.com
Provides a Letter of Attestation to help SaaS clients prove security posture to their own customers. They insist on a third-party penetration testing report and a Letter of Attestation as part of the deal. This is where Qualysec took the lead.
— qualysec.com
Outlined in published security policies, Qualysec ensures compliance with industry standards.
— qualysec.com
9.1
Category 6: Methodology & Accuracy
What We Looked For
Evidence of rigorous testing standards, manual verification to reduce noise, and accuracy of findings.
What We Found
Qualysec emphasizes a 'Zero False Positives' guarantee achieved through manual verification of all automated scan results. Their process-based testing ensures that reported vulnerabilities are valid and exploitable, saving developer time.
Score Rationale
The explicit guarantee of zero false positives through manual vetting distinguishes them from automated-only solutions, meriting a score above 9.0 for accuracy.
Supporting Evidence
Methodology includes manual exploitation to validate severity and impact, going beyond passive scanning. False Positives: Zealously minimizing false positives through meticulous manual pen testing.
— qualysec.com
Guarantees zero false positives by manually verifying every vulnerability found by automated tools. Zero False Positives Guarantee: Although automated compliance tools tend to produce many false positives, Qualysec has a human checkpoint on each vulnerability and verifies the vulnerability first
— qualysec.com
Provides expert support and resources for onboarding, as detailed in product documentation.
— qualysec.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Terms of service explicitly limit liability to the fees paid and do not guarantee the identification of all vulnerabilities, a standard but notable contractual limitation.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Limited volume of verified third-party reviews on major platforms like G2 (only 1 review found), which limits broad market validation compared to larger competitors.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Checkmarx is a comprehensive SaaS solution specifically designed for SaaS companies to streamline their vulnerability scanning and penetration testing process. It not only assists in identifying vulnerabilities but also aids in remediation, enabling security teams and developers to focus on other critical areas.
Checkmarx is a comprehensive SaaS solution specifically designed for SaaS companies to streamline their vulnerability scanning and penetration testing process. It not only assists in identifying vulnerabilities but also aids in remediation, enabling security teams and developers to focus on other critical areas.
EXPERT CERTIFIED
Best for teams that are
Enterprises needing a unified platform for SAST, DAST, and SCA.
DevSecOps teams requiring deep integration into CI/CD pipelines.
Small teams wanting a simple, plug-and-play vulnerability scanner.
Users seeking a low-maintenance tool with a shallow learning curve.
Organizations looking solely for a DAST solution without code analysis.
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Checkmarx stands out as a true enterprise-grade powerhouse, unifying SAST, DAST, SCA, and API security into a single platform. Research indicates it is a dominant market leader, securing 'Leader' status in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for seven consecutive years. Based on documented features, its ability to integrate deeply into the SDLC with AI-driven remediation makes it a top choice for large organizations prioritizing comprehensive governance over low-cost simplicity.
Pros
Unified platform for SAST, DAST, SCA, API
7-time Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader
Extensive IDE and CI/CD integrations
AI-powered remediation and query builder
Supports 75+ languages and frameworks
Cons
High cost and opaque pricing model
User interface can be complex to navigate
Documented false positives in specific languages
Slow scan times for large applications
Steep learning curve for configuration
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.3/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Vulnerability Scanning & Pen Testing Tools for SaaS Companies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.4
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of security testing modules (SAST, DAST, SCA) and advanced features like AI-driven remediation tailored for enterprise AppSec.
What We Found
Checkmarx One is a comprehensive unified platform offering SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC Security, API Security, and Container Security, enhanced by AI-powered query builders and remediation assistants.
Score Rationale
The product scores exceptionally high due to its all-in-one platform approach covering the entire SDLC, though its complexity prevents a perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
Includes AI-powered tools like 'AI Query Builder' and 'AI Security Champion' to assist in remediation. Checkmarx One Version 3.0 now offers AI-powered application security. AI Query Builder joins the CheckAI plug-in... and AI Security Champion.
— securitybrief.co.uk
The platform unifies SAST, DAST, SCA, API Security, IaC Security, and Container Security into a single solution. The Checkmarx One platform includes: SAST; DAST; SCA; SCS; API Security; IaC Security; Container Security.
— checkmarx.com
Documented in official product documentation, Checkmarx provides comprehensive vulnerability scanning and effective remediation assistance.
— checkmarx.com
9.5
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for sustained industry leadership, recognition from major analyst firms, and adoption by large-scale enterprises.
What We Found
Checkmarx demonstrates dominant market presence, having been named a Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing for seven consecutive years and a Leader in the Forrester Wave.
Score Rationale
Achieving 'Leader' status for seven consecutive years in the Gartner Magic Quadrant is a top-tier trust signal that justifies a near-perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
Recognized as a Leader in the Forrester Wave for Static Application Security Testing. Checkmarx has been named a Leader in the latest Forrester Wave assessment of Static Application Security Testing.
— securitybrief.in
Named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing for the seventh consecutive time. Checkmarx... has been named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing (AST)... This marks the company's seventh time as a Leader.
— checkmarx.com
Recognized by CyberSecurity Breakthrough Awards as the AppSec Company of the Year 2023.
— cybersecuritybreakthrough.com
8.6
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess the user interface design, ease of triage, and overall developer experience when interacting with scan results.
What We Found
While recognized as a Gartner Peer Insights 'Customers' Choice', users frequently cite a complex user interface and difficulties in navigating the web portal as friction points.
Score Rationale
The score is strong due to high customer recommendation rates, but docked slightly for documented complaints about UI complexity and navigation issues.
Supporting Evidence
Users report the user interface can be complex and 'clunky' for certain tasks. Usability (as the user interface can feel a bit complex)... The only negative think I'd have to say about Checkmarx is that sometimes the user interface can be a bit clunky.
— gartner.com
Recognized as a 2024 Customers' Choice for Application Security Testing on Gartner Peer Insights. Checkmarx has been recognized as a 2024 Customers' Choice for Application Security Testing by Gartner Peer Insights.
— checkmarx.com
Outlined in user documentation, the platform offers developer-friendly tools but requires a complex setup process.
— checkmarx.com
8.2
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We look for clear public pricing, flexible licensing models, and perceived return on investment for the buyer.
What We Found
Pricing is opaque and quote-based, with users describing the solution as 'expensive' and the licensing model as 'complex' or 'rigid'.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the lack of public pricing and user feedback indicating high costs and complex licensing, which creates friction for potential buyers.
Supporting Evidence
Users describe the licensing model as confusing and the product as expensive. It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear... Checkmarx is not a cheap solution.
— peerspot.com
Pricing is not publicly available and requires contacting sales. Checkmarx One is an enterprise AppSec platform, and provides flexible, competitive pricing... For more information, please contact our sales team.
— checkmarx.com
Pricing requires custom quotes, limiting upfront cost visibility for small businesses.
— checkmarx.com
8.8
Category 5: Security Coverage & Scan Accuracy
What We Looked For
We examine the breadth of language support and the accuracy of scan results, specifically looking for false positive rates.
What We Found
The platform covers 75+ languages and frameworks. While third-party reports claim high accuracy, user reviews frequently cite frustration with false positives in specific contexts like iOS and JSP.
Score Rationale
High scores for broad coverage are tempered by persistent user reports of false positives, preventing a score in the 9.0+ range.
Supporting Evidence
Users report high false positive rates, specifically citing issues with iOS password detection. Checkmarx treats all names, including constants, variables, even case names as potential variables to store passwords... for iOS, checkmarx is nearly 99% useless.
— reddit.com
Tolly Group report claims Checkmarx has 77% higher precision than competitors. The Tolly Report found that Checkmarx reduces alert noise with 77% higher precision compared to the 'dev-friendly' competitor.
— checkmarx.com
Supports over 75 languages and 100 frameworks. 75+ Languages. 100+ Frameworks. 75+ Technologies.
— checkmarx.com
9.1
Category 6: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We evaluate the depth of support for IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and repository managers essential for DevSecOps workflows.
What We Found
Checkmarx offers extensive integrations with major IDEs (VS Code, IntelliJ, Eclipse) and CI/CD platforms (Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions), facilitating a true 'shift left' approach.
Score Rationale
The wide array of supported plugins and seamless integration into developer workflows justifies a score above 9.0.
Supporting Evidence
Provides specialized plugins for CI/CD platforms like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Azure DevOps. We provide specialized plugins to enable seamless integration of Checkmarx One with the following popular CI/CD platforms: Jenkins. TeamCity. GitHub. Azure DevOps. Maven.
— docs.checkmarx.com
Supports integrations with major IDEs including Eclipse, JetBrains, and VS Code. Checkmarx One can be easily integrated into your Integrated Development Environment (IDE) of choice, including Eclipse and JetBrains... VS Code.
— youtube.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The licensing model is described by users as complex and rigid, and pricing is not transparent, often requiring negotiation.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Users consistently report high rates of false positives in specific environments (e.g., iOS, JSP), requiring significant manual triage despite vendor claims of high accuracy.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
The "How We Choose" section for vulnerability scanning and pen testing tools for SaaS companies outlines the methodology employed to evaluate and rank the products. Key factors considered in the analysis include product specifications, essential features, customer reviews, expert ratings, and the overall value proposition each tool offers to SaaS companies. Specific considerations for this category included the tools’ effectiveness in identifying vulnerabilities, integration capabilities with existing systems, and the comprehensiveness of reporting features, which are critical for compliance and security management.
The research and analysis approach involved a detailed comparison of specifications across the evaluated products, alongside an in-depth analysis of customer feedback and ratings from reputable sources. This structured methodology allowed for a thorough evaluation of the price-to-value ratio, ensuring that SaaS companies can make informed decisions based on objective data and insights gathered from various industry resources.
Overall scores reflect relative ranking within this category, accounting for which limitations materially affect real-world use cases. Small differences in category scores can result in larger ranking separation when those differences affect the most common or highest-impact workflows.
Verification
Products evaluated through comprehensive research and analysis of industry standards for vulnerability scanning and penetration testing tools.
Rankings based on a thorough analysis of user reviews, expert ratings, and feature specifications specific to SaaS security needs.
Selection criteria focus on essential features such as detection capabilities, ease of integration, and compliance with security regulations for SaaS companies.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We may also earn commissions from other affiliate partners.
×
Score Breakdown
0.0/ 10
Deep Research
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. By continuing to use our website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Learn more
